Standardized CEUS Algorithms for Diagnosis of HCC - Prospective German Multicenter Study (ESCULAP)

February 28, 2021 updated by: Dr. med. Barbara Schellhaas and Prof. Dr. med. Deike Strobel, University Hospital Erlangen

Standardized Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) -Algorithms for the Non-invasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) in High-risk-patients - a Prospective German Multicenter Study

Aim of this prospective national multicenter study is to improve standardization of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients.

The study is funded by the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To date, CEUS criteria for non-invasive diagnosis of HCC include arterial phase hyperenhancement, followed by contrast washout in the portal venous or late phase. We would like to investigate the following points:

  1. whether arterial hyperenhancement alone is sufficient for the definite diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis with CEUS
  2. whether a further clearly-defined point of assessment in the late phase after 4-6 minutes is of additional diagnostic value in focal liver lesions showing no contrast washout after 3 minutes
  3. diagnostic value of CEUS-based standardised diagnostic algorithms (ESCULAP = Erlanger Synopsis of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at risk; CEUS LI-RADS = Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) for non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in high-risk patients (diagnostic accuracy, interobserver-variability, feasability in clinical Routine).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
517

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
    • Bavaria
      • Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany, 91054
        • University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Medicine 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

High-risk patients for HCC according to German national guidelines (AWMF / DGVS): 1- cirrhosis of any origin; 2- chronic hepatitis B infection; 3 - chronic hepatitis C infection; 4 - non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH); 5 - hereditary hemochromatosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • high risk for HCC
  • focal liver lesion on B-mode ultrasound

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pre-treated HCC lesion
  • systemic therapy for HCC (sorafenib, regorafenib and others)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients at risk for HCC

Patients with any of the following conditions:

liver cirrhosis of any origin chronic hepatitis B infection chronic hepatitis C infection with advanced fibrosis non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) hemochromatosis

Interventions: B-mode ultrasound, contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); MRI / histology
Diagnostic test: contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)
CEUS with SonoVue following standardized protocol
Diagnostic test: MRI
CE-MRI following standardized protocol
Diagnostic test: Histology
diagnostic liver biopsy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic value of standardised CEUS-based algorithms for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in high-risk patients
Time Frame: 2 years
Diagnostic accuracy, interobserver-variabilty and feasability in clinical routine for CEUS-based algorithms Reference Standard: histology / MRI
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic value / dispensability of contrast washout for definite diagnosis of HCC with CEUS
Time Frame: 2 years
Sensitvity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of arterial hyperenhancement only compared with arterial hyperenhancement followed by contrast washout for non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in high-risk patients Reference Standard: histology / MRI
2 years
Standardisation of CEUS examinations
Time Frame: 2 years
Diagnostic value of an additional standardised examination point in the late phase after 4-6 minutes in lesions without contrast washout after 3 minutes Reference Standard: histology / MRI
2 years
Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC)
Time Frame: 2 years
Sensitvity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for non-invasive diagnosis of ICC in high-risk patients / differential diagnosis of HCC versus ICC Reference Standard: histology
2 years
Comparison of two CEUS-based algorithms
Time Frame: 2 years
ESCULAP versus CEUS LI-RADS (diagnostic accuracy, interobserver agreement) Reference Standard: histology / MRI
2 years
Non-inferiority of CEUS versus MRI for non-invasive diagnosis of HCC
Time Frame: 2 years
Comparison of CEUS and MRI for non-invasive diagnosis of HCC (diagnostic accuracy, interobserver agreement) Reference Standard: histology
2 years
Influence of histological grading on contrast enhancement behaviour
Time Frame: 2 years
correlation of histological grading and contrast enhancement pattern
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital Erlangen

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Barbara Schellhaas, MD, University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Medicine 1
  • Principal Investigator: Deike Strobel, MD, University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Medicine 1

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 6, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 6, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DEGUM CEUS HCC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Diseases

Clinical Trials on contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings