Effectiveness of Light-emitting Diode (LED) Photobiomodulation in the Extraction of Retained Lower Third Molars
Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial on the Effectiveness of Light-emitting Diode (LED) Photobiomodulation in Pain Management, Facial Edema, Trismus and Quality of Life After Extraction of Retained Lower Third Molars
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
SP
-
São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 01504-000
- Recruiting
- Uninove
-
Contact:
- Sandra K Bussadori, PhD
- Phone Number: 1126339000
- Email: sandra.skb@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who need surgical removal of retained lower third molars;
- Patients who agree to participate in the study after reading and signing the Term of Consent for Participation in Clinical Research.
- Patients with indication for extraction of lower third molars (recurrent infections, bad position, orthodontic indication) or written professional indication (ASA I - negative medical history), systolic blood pressure less than 140mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure lower than 90mmHg and heart rate values of 70 ± 20 beats / minute and have the upper and lower central incisor teeth.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have systemic diseases, chronic pain or neurological and psychiatric disorders;
- Claim to be smokers;
- Are using anti-inflammatories, analgesics or bisphosphonates in the last 15 days;
- Present active pericoronaritis;
- Are pregnant;
- are breastfeeding;
- Severe temporomandibular disorders
- Have photo sensitivity history
- Are allergic to any drug used in the research (paracetamol, chlorhexidine 2%)
- Patients presenting radiolucent images associated with the teeth to be extracted
- Patients who present any type of complication during surgery (hemorrhage, operative difficulty, time greater than 90 minutes of surgery), as these cases are not in the standard expected for third molar surgeries. In this case the central action analgesic will be prescribed. These data will not be part of the statistical analysis but will be described and discussed as well as possible adverse effects.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: LED group
The patients (n=17) will receive daily intra and extra oral LED applications from the immediate postoperative period up to 7 days after the surgical procedure.
The LED irradiation will be performed in two areas, one intra and one extra oral.
The LED to be used in the intraoral site will be red, 660+/-20nm wavelength, 5 mW power, 2.7J/cm2 energy density for 7 min, 2J energy per point, knowing that the 6 irradiated spots will have 12J in total.
In the extra oral site the infra-red LED will be used, 850+/-20nm wavelength, power of 5mW, 3.8J/cm2 of energy density for 10 min, 3J of energy per point, knowing that 36 will be irradiated, so we will have 108J in total.
|
The patients (n=17) will receive daily intra and extra oral LED applications from the immediate postoperative period up to 7 days after the surgical procedure.
The LED irradiation will be performed in two areas, one intra and one extra oral.
The LED to be used in the intraoral site will be red, 660+/-20nm wavelength, 5 mW power, 2.7J/cm2 energy density for 7 min, 2J energy per point, knowing that the 6 irradiated spots will have 12J in total.
In the extra oral site the infra-red LED will be used, 850+/-20nm wavelength, power of 5mW, 3.8J/cm2 of energy density for 10 min, 3J of energy per point, knowing that 36 will be irradiated, so we will have 108J in total.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham group
Patients (n=17) will be treated in the same way as the LED group.
The person in charge of the application will simulate the intraoral and extraoral irradiation by positioning the LED in the same locations described for the LED group, but the equipment will be kept off.
So that the patient does not identify the sound of activation of the device (beep), it will be recorded, and connected at the time of application.
|
Patients will be treated in the same way as the LED group.
The person in charge of the application will simulate the intraoral and extraoral irradiation by positioning the LED in the same locations described for the LED group, but the equipment will be kept off.
So that the patient does not identify the sound of activation of the device (beep), it will be recorded, and connected at the time of application.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in postoperative pain
Time Frame: After 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.
|
A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be printed on the patient evaluation form and the subjects will be instructed by the evaluator to mark a point in the line of 10 cm, indicating the intensity of their pain after 1,2, 5 and 7 days of the surgeries.
|
After 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes of postoperative edema
Time Frame: After 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.
|
The evaluator will measure the distances between the corner of the eye and angle of the mandible, between the tragus and labial commissure and between the tragus and pogonium.
|
After 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.
|
|
Change of trismus
Time Frame: After 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.
|
The evaluator will measure the opening of the mouth using a pachymeter in each patient 1, 2, 5 and 7 days after surgery.
|
After 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.
|
|
Changes in quality of life
Time Frame: Before and 7 days after surgery.
|
The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) is a simplified form of the original OHIP questionnaire that is used to assess the impact of oral health on subjects' quality of life.
The items are distributed among the following subscales: functional limitation, pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological deficiency, social incapacity and disability.
The questionnaire will be applied by the evaluator.
|
Before and 7 days after surgery.
|
|
Changes in postoperative pain (NRS-10 scale)
Time Frame: After 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.
|
For the NRS-101 scale, the evaluators will ask patients to assign a number between 0 (no pain) and 100 (worst possible pain) that best represents the pain they are currently experiencing after 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.
|
After 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Carlos
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
NCT07378215RecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-Life
-
NCT04239183UnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
NCT02901639UnknownImproving Quality of Life
-
NCT04761367CompletedImprove Quality of Life
-
NCT05722249CompletedProfessional Quality of Life
-
NCT06014671CompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life of
-
NCT06262334RecruitingHealth Related Quality of Life
-
NCT01155076CompletedHealth-related Quality of Life
-
NCT01784497CompletedHealth Related Quality of Life
Clinical Trials on LED group
-
NCT03465228CompletedLow Back Pain | Hydrotherapy | Exertion; Excess
-
NCT07000240RecruitingMaternal Satisfaction | Transperineal Ultrasound | Midwife-led Pushing Training Program | Duration of the Second Stage | Coactivation Rates of Pelvic Floor Muscles | Perineal Tear Rates
-
NCT01949649CompletedEating Disorder Prevention
-
NCT03914898Completed
-
NCT06533072RecruitingScar | Wound Heal | Cholecystectasia
-
NCT07525388RecruitingAnxiety | Surgery | Fear | Relaxation Exercise | Therapeutic Clown
-
NCT05663723CompletedPeripheral Nervous System Diseases AND Breast Neoplasms
-
NCT02724839Completed
-
NCT03833726CompletedBreast Cancer | Atrophy;Vaginal