Reducing Blood Loss During Cesarean Section by Topical Versus IV Tranexamic Acid

August 3, 2020 updated by: hany farouk, Aswan University Hospital

Reducing Blood Loss During Cesarean Section With Intravenous Versus Topical Tranexamic Acid: a Double-blinded Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial

Tranexamic (TXA)acid is an inexpensive, antifibrinolytic drug long used to control bleeding due to surgery, menorrhagia, or trauma. Additionally, tranexamic acid has been shown to reduce bleeding during cesarean delivery as well as the need for additional uterotonic agents, albeit to a minimal degree. However, previous studies have been performed only in women with a standard risk for postpartum hemorrhage( PPH) and have not focused on assessing the effects of tranexamic acid in high-risk women. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of IV versus topical application of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during and after elective C.S. The Research Question Is topical application of Tranexamic acid effective in reducing blood loss during and after an elective Caesarean section? The Research Hypothesis the TXA could be able to reduce blood loss during and after elective Caesarean section. The null hypothesis will, therefore, state that: There will be no difference between topical and IV TXA and placebo in reducing blood loss during and after elective Caesarean section.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

patients were allocated to one of three groups after induction of general anesthesia and immediately prior to the operation and just before skin incision. they received 1-gram tranexamic acid (10 ml) in 100 ml saline infusion or placebo (110 normal saline) by slow intravenous injection at an approximate rate of 1 mL per min. Throughout the operation, irrigation was done by 60 ml of (2g tranexamic acid (10 ml) diluted in 100 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%) or placebo ( 60 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%.).At the end of operation, another dose of 60 ml of (1g tranexamic acid (10 ml) diluted in 50 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%) or placebo ( 60 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%.) was left intraabdominal

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
450

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Aswan, Egypt, 81528
        • Aswan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all pregnant women with a single term fetus scheduled for elective cesarean section who will be at risk of postpartum hemorrhage

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a cardiac, hepatic, renal or thromboembolic disease. ,
  • patients with the high possibility of the morbid adherent placenta,
  • known coagulopathy and
  • those presented with severe antepartum hemorrhage
  • refuse to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: normal saline arm group
they received 110 ml saline infusion or placebo (110 normal salines) by slow intravenous injection at an approximate rate of 1 mL per min plus Throughout the operation irrigation was done by120 ml saline
Other: normal saline arm group
110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 120 ml normal saline applied on the placental bed during Cesarean section
Other Names:
  • placebo comparator
Active Comparator: intravenous tranexamic acid group
1 gm tranexamic acid (2 ampoules of Capron 500 mg /5 ml; Cairo, Egypt) intravenous just before skin incision plus100 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 120 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy
Drug: intravenous tranexamic acid
1 gm tranexamic acid (2 ampoules of Capron 500 mg /5 ml; Cairo, Egypt) intravenous just before skin incision plus110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 120 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed during cesarean section
Other Names:
  • active comparator
Experimental: Topical tranexamic acid group
2 gm topical tranexamic acid ( 4 ampoules of Capron 500 mg/5 ml applied typically) in 100 ml normal saline applied on the placental bed after Cesarean section plus110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision
Drug: Topical tranexamic acid
2 gm topical tranexamic acid ( 4 ampoules of Capron 500 mg/5 ml applied typically) in 120 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed during cesarean section plus110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision
Other Names:
  • active comparator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intraoperative blood loss
Time Frame: during the operation
measures the intraoperative blood loss by direct and gravimetric methods
during the operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative blood loss
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
measurement the intraoperative blood loss by direct and gravimetric methods
24 hours postoperative
need of blood transfusion
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
number of unites of blood transfusion
24 hours postoperative
need of uterotonic
Time Frame: during operation
misoprostol,oxytocin etc
during operation
change in hemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 hours postoperative
Baseline and 24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Aswan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • aswu/278/7/18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section Complications

Clinical Trials on normal saline arm group

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings