The Effect of the Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on the Speech Fluency Enhancement

November 5, 2020 updated by: Moin, Iran University of Medical Sciences

The Effect of the Combined Treatment Approach of Delayed Auditory Feedback and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhancement of Speech Fluency in Adults Who Stutter

The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of concurrent transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and fluency training in adults with developmental stuttering. We examine the severity of stuttering to investigate the effect of treatnment. In the control group the anodal tDCS and DAF will applied on six consecutive days (1 milliampere [mA] for 20 mins per day), and the control group will received the sham stimulation and DAF for the same time. The severity of stuttering measured by means of tasks and questionnaires before and after treatment sessions and 6 weeks after intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 46 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of developmental stuttering
  • Participants diagnosed with moderate to severe stuttering
  • Right handed
  • Native speaker of Farsi

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Speech or language disorders other than stuttering
  • Received stuttering treatment within the past year
  • Hearing loss
  • History of neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • History of seizure
  • Taking any medication that may affect brain function such as anti-depressants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental
Participants will receive one anodal tDCS at 1 mA intensity over the left superior temporal gyrus (T3 in 10-20 international system) and the cathode tDCS over the right orbitofrontal area (Fp2 in 10-20 international system). tDCS will be delivered for 20 minutes during fluency intervention for six consecutive days.
Device: Anodal tDCS
1 mA anodal tDCS positioned over left superior temporal gyrus and the cathode placed over the occipital lobe. The tDCS stimulation will be delivered for 20 minutes on 6 intervention days.
Behavioral: fluency intervention/ Delayed Auditory Feedback
Each participant complete three tasks include reading, conversation, and narration. Delayed auditory feedback will be used during these tasks. Each treatment session will take 20 minutes.
Sham Comparator: Sham Comparator
Participants will receive sham tDCS while the one anode electrode will be positioned over the left superior temporal gyrus and the cathode will be placed over the right orbitofrontal similar to the active mode. The sham stimulation will break down after 30 seconds at the beginning of 20 minutes of fluency intervention for six consecutive days.
Behavioral: fluency intervention/ Delayed Auditory Feedback
Each participant complete three tasks include reading, conversation, and narration. Delayed auditory feedback will be used during these tasks. Each treatment session will take 20 minutes.
Device: Sham tDCS
The anodal tDCS positioned over left superior temporal gyrus and the cathode placed over the occipital lobe. The current of sham stimulation will involve 30 seconds of stimulation at the beginning of the 20 minutes on 6 intervention days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean score of percentage of Stuttered Syllables produced in the speech sample
Time Frame: Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
Researcher will calculate the Percentage of Stuttered Syllables (SS %) in the speech sample. Lower percentage of Stuttered Syllables represents better outcomes.
Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean score of the Stuttering Severity Instrument version 4 (SSI-4)
Time Frame: Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
The Stuttering Severity Instrument (SSI-4) is a standardized measure of stuttering severity consist of of 3 subscales (frequency, duration and physical concomitants) which are summed to give a total score. The maximum total score of the SSI-4 is 56, which corresponds to the highest stuttering severity. So, lower score represents better outcomes.
Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
Mean score of the Overall Assessment of Speakers Experience of Stuttering (OASES)
Time Frame: Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
The OASES is a standardized assessment to measure the effect of stuttering on a person's life that consists of 4 subscales (general information about speech, your reactions to stuttering, communication in daily situations, quality of life). Each sub-test has a score from 1 to 5 in which the number 1 indicates the least negative impact and number 5 shows the most negative impact. These are combined to give a total impact score between 1 and 5, with 5 representing the highest negative impact on person's life. So, higher score represents better outcomes.
Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Iran University of Medical Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Reyhane Mohamadi, Iran University of Medical Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 98-2-75-15001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stuttering/ Developmental

Clinical Trials on Anodal tDCS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings