Enhancing Medication-based Analgesia in Humans- STUDY 2

December 15, 2023 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Evaluating Cannabidiol (CBD) to Enhance the Analgesic Effect of Hydromorphone in Humans

This is a single-group, within-subject, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo and active-controlled study evaluated whether the FDA-approved cannabinoid cannabidiol (CBD; Epidiolex) would enhance analgesia, subjective reports, and cognitive performance when compared to the FDA-approved opioid hydromorphone (Dilaudid). This is study 2 is a series of studies.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This was a human laboratory systematic examination of whether adding the FDA-approved cannabinoid cannabidiol (CBD; Epidiolex; oral) to the FDA-approved opioid hydromorphone (Dilaudid; oral) would change the experience of hydromorphone as rated by laboratory measures of pain, subjective reports of drug effects, and cognitive performance. Subjects are healthy individuals with no history of drug use disorder. Study subjects and staff were completed blinded to the study drugs and the class of drugs under investigation and were informed that subjects may receive opioids, stimulants, cannabinoids, benzodiazepines, over the counter medications, and/or placebo. All participants completed all sessions. Sessions lasted up to 8-hours and were conducted at least 7 days apart on an outpatient basis. Primary outcomes were collected from participants prior to dosing and at several hour periods post-dosing.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
31

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins University Bayview Medical Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18-75
  • Urine sample tests negative for common illicit substances of abuse, including cannabis
  • Medically cleared to take study medications
  • Are not pregnant or breast feeding
  • Willing to comply with the study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Meet DSM-5 criteria for alcohol/substance use disorder
  • Taking opioids for pain
  • Previous adverse reaction to a cannabinoid product
  • Prescribed and taking stimulants or benzodiazepines
  • Answer "yes" to item 1 of the Brief Pain Inventory indicating chronic pain
  • Self-report any illicit drug or cannabinoid use in the past 7 days
  • Presence of any clinically significant medical/psychiatric illness judged by the investigators to put subject at elevated risk for experiencing an adverse event
  • History of seizure disorder
  • Have a known allergy to the study medications or sesame seed oil
  • ALT or AST levels >3x ULN and/or Bilirubin levels >2x ULN during Screening
  • Current (past 60-day) suicidal thoughts or past year history of suicidal behavior
  • Taking medications contraindicated with hydromorphone or cannabidiol
  • Have a history of clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias or vasopastic disease
  • Have an abnormal and clinically-significant ECG

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo+Placebo
Within-subject double-blind, double-dummy administration of placebo + placebo. Order of dose randomized session days 2-5.
Drug: Within-subject test of blinded study medications
Within-subject double-blind, double-dummy, study design wherein all participants received all doses in 8-hour outpatient sessions. Primary outcomes assessed during 8-hour outpatient sessions and included laboratory pain testing, subjective reports of drug effects, and cognitive performance, evaluated as a function of study medication condition.
Active Comparator: Hydromorphone+Placebo
Within-subject double-blind, double-dummy administration of hydromorphone (oral) 4mg + placebo. Always administered during session 1.
Drug: Within-subject test of blinded study medications
Within-subject double-blind, double-dummy, study design wherein all participants received all doses in 8-hour outpatient sessions. Primary outcomes assessed during 8-hour outpatient sessions and included laboratory pain testing, subjective reports of drug effects, and cognitive performance, evaluated as a function of study medication condition.
Experimental: Hydromorphone (oral) 4mg + Cannabidiol 50mg
Within-subject double-blind, double-dummy administration of hydromorphone (oral) 4mg + cannabidiol (oral) 50mg. Order of dose randomized session days 2-5.
Drug: Within-subject test of blinded study medications
Within-subject double-blind, double-dummy, study design wherein all participants received all doses in 8-hour outpatient sessions. Primary outcomes assessed during 8-hour outpatient sessions and included laboratory pain testing, subjective reports of drug effects, and cognitive performance, evaluated as a function of study medication condition.
Experimental: Hydromorphone (oral) 4mg + Cannabidiol 100mg
Within-subject double-blind, double-dummy administration of hydromorphone (oral) 4mg + cannabidiol (oral) 100mg. Order of dose randomized session days 2-5.
Drug: Within-subject test of blinded study medications
Within-subject double-blind, double-dummy, study design wherein all participants received all doses in 8-hour outpatient sessions. Primary outcomes assessed during 8-hour outpatient sessions and included laboratory pain testing, subjective reports of drug effects, and cognitive performance, evaluated as a function of study medication condition.
Experimental: Hydromorphone (oral) 4mg + Cannabidiol 200mg
Within-subject double-blind, double-dummy administration of hydromorphone (oral) 4mg + cannabidiol (oral) 200mg. Order of dose randomized session days 2-5.
Drug: Within-subject test of blinded study medications
Within-subject double-blind, double-dummy, study design wherein all participants received all doses in 8-hour outpatient sessions. Primary outcomes assessed during 8-hour outpatient sessions and included laboratory pain testing, subjective reports of drug effects, and cognitive performance, evaluated as a function of study medication condition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak Cold Pressor Tolerance
Time Frame: 8 hour study session
Peak amount of time participant submerged hand in cold pressor (5 degree circulating cold water) laboratory test of pain as a function of double- blinded study medications (range 0 -300).
8 hour study session
Peak Self-report Rating of "Drug Effect" (0-100), as Measured by the Visual Analog Rating Scale
Time Frame: 8 hour study session
Peak self-report rating of "Drug Effect" on a 0 ("none at all") to 100 ("extremely") visual analog scale as a function of double- blinded study medication, wherein higher values indicate stronger subjectively-experienced drug effects.
8 hour study session
Peak Number Accurate on Circular Lights
Time Frame: 8 hour study session
Peak number accuracy on the Circular Lights fine motor task as a function of double-blinded study drug administration. Participants were provided 60 seconds to press buttons that are lit in randomized order and displayed automatically on a circular lights wall mounted unit. The primary outcome is the number of lit buttons that were accurately pressed within 60 seconds, which is a metric to assess fine motor impairment. Lower numbers are indicative of greater drug-related impairment. There is no upper limit on the circular lights task.
8 hour study session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johns Hopkins University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Claudia Campbell, PhD, Johns Hopkins University
  • Principal Investigator: Kelly E Dunn, PhD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 15, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00214289
  • R01DA040644 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Within-subject test of blinded study medications

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings