Post-Market Clinical Follow-up Performance and Safety Study of Etermis 3 and 4 in the Face (POMET)

December 27, 2019 updated by: Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH

Open Label Multicenter Evaluator-blinded Post-market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study to Confirm Performance and Safety of Etermis 3 and 4 in the Treatment of Moderate and Severe Wrinkles/Folds as Well as Facial Volume Enhancement

To confirm the clinical performance of Etermis 3 and Etermis 4 based on the blinded investigator´s assessments on the respective Merz Aesthetics Scales from day 0 (D0) pre-injection to month 6/7 (depending on touch up) visit for nasolabial folds and marionette lines and from D0 pre-injection to month 3/4 (depending on touch up) visit for upper and lower lip fullness.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
154

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Darmstadt, Germany, 64283
        • Merz Investigational Site #0490099
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20146
        • Merz Investigational Site #0490095
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22609
        • Merz Investigational Site #0490345
      • Kassel, Germany, 34121
        • Merz Investigational Site #0490309
      • München, Germany, 80333
        • Merz Investigational Site #0490368
      • Potsdam, Germany, 14467
        • Merz Investigational Site #0490362

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy male and female subjects seeking hyaluronic acid dermal filler treatment to redefine/volumize/correct at least two of the indicated facial areas (NLFs, marionette lines, upper and lower lips)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects seeking hyaluronic acid dermal filler treatment to redefine/volumize/correct at least two of the indicated facial areas:

    • Nasolabial folds
    • Marionette lines
    • Upper and lower lip fullness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects that have already been injected with non-resorbable filler, or that have recently been treated with any dermal filler in the region to be treated in the study
  • Subjects with known sensitivity to hyaluronic acid-based products

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Responder rate for marionette lines after treatment with Etermis 3 based on the blinded Investigator's opinion on the Merz Aesthetics Scale "Marionette lines- At Rest"
Time Frame: Baseline to month 6-7
Baseline to month 6-7
Responder rate for lips after treatment with Etermis 3 based on the blinded Investigator's opinion on the Merz Aesthetics Scale "Upper and lower lip fullness - At Rest"
Time Frame: Baseline to month 3-4
Baseline to month 3-4
Responder rate for NLFs after treatment with Etermis 4 based on the blinded Investigator's opinion on the Merz Aesthetics Scale "Nasolabial folds- At Rest"
Time Frame: Baseline to month 6-7
Baseline to month 6-7
Responder rate for marionette lines after treatment with Etermis 4 based on the blinded Investigator's opinion on the Merz Aesthetics Scale "Marionette lines- At Rest"
Time Frame: Baseline to month 6-7
Baseline to month 6-7
Responder rate for lips after treatment with Etermis 4 based on the blinded Investigator's opinion on the Merz Aesthetics Scale "Upper and lower lip fullness - At Rest"
Time Frame: Baseline to month 3-4
Baseline to month 3-4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change of blinded Investigator's assessment of marionette lines, per product from D0 pre-injection to M1 visit (before touch-up), to M2, to M3/M4, to M6/M7, to M9/M10, and to M12/M13 according to the Merz Aesthetics Scale "Marionette lines - At Rest
Time Frame: Baseline up to month 12-13
Baseline up to month 12-13
Change of blinded Investigator's assessment of lip volume, per product from D0 pre-injection to M1 visit (before touch-up), to M2, to M3/M4, to M6/M7, to M9/M10, and to M12/M13 according to Merz Aesthetics Scale "Upper and Lower lip fullness - At Rest"
Time Frame: Baseline up to month 12-13
Baseline up to month 12-13
Change of blinded Investigator's assessment of nasolabial folds, per product from D0 pre-injection to M1 visit (before touch-up), to M2, to M3/M4, to M6/M7, to M9/M10, and to M12/M13 according to the Merz Aesthetics Scale "Nasolabial folds - At Rest"
Time Frame: Baseline up to month 12-13
Baseline up to month 12-13
Subject's satisfaction on the global impression of changes scale (GICS) from D0 pre-injection photos to M1 visit pre-optional touch-ups, M2 visit if applicable, M3/M4, M6/M7 visit, M9/M10 visit and to M12/M13 visit.
Time Frame: Baseline up to month 12-13
Baseline up to month 12-13
Blinded Investigator's global opinion on clinical performance on the global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) from D0 pre-injection photos to M1 visit pre-optional touch-ups, M2 visit if applicable, M3/M4, M6/M7 visit, M9/M10 visit and to M12/M13 visit.
Time Frame: Baseline up to month 12-13
Baseline up to month 12-13

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 27, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 27, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 27, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • M900991001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Correction of Facial Wrinkles/Folds

Clinical Trials on Etermis 3

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings