Assessment of Intravenous Rate Control Response in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (AIRCRAFT) (AIRCRAFT)

December 1, 2021 updated by: Boston University

Assessment of Intravenous Rate Control Response in Atrial Fibrillation Trial Pilot Study (AIRCRAFT)

The Assessment of Intravenous Rate Control Response in Atrial Fibrillation Trial Pilot Study (AIRCRAFT Pilot) is a prospective, unblinded, pragmatic, cluster-level allocation trial. AIRCRAFT compares two medication classes commonly used for rate control in patients in atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular rate (RVR). The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility and approach to conducting a trial that compares the use of IV beta blockers and IV calcium channel blockers for patients in AF with RVR in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). AF with RVR is considered when the following parameters are met: (1) Cardiac rhythm consistent with AF (2) Heart rate > 110 bpm. AF with RVR recurrence after conversion to sinus rhythm or prior rate control will count as a new episode of AF with RVR. Rate control agents will be pseudo-randomized to each of the three different MICU teams (beta-blocker, calcium channel blocker and physician preference). Patients are admitted to the three MICU teams on a rotating basis which will allow for pseudo-randomization, the effects of which will be equal between the three teams. Patients will be enrolled in the study if they develop AF with RVR and will be followed until discharge from the MICU. This study aims to assess the adherence and fidelity to treatment assignments in the current novel pilot study protocol which will help inform the feasibility of a larger-scale efficacy trial between IV beta blockers and IV calcium channel blockers for initial management of AF with RVR. Assessment of adherence and fidelity to treatment assignments in management of AF with RVR in the MICU will help inform power calculations and the percent of patients in each study group that received the assigned class of medication will help inform feasibility. Additional aims include assessment of time from medication administration to rate control or sinus conversion as well as identifying optimal means of data extraction (manual vs automated), and incidence of adverse events including hypotension and bradycardia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Boston Medical Center MICU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adults admitted to the MICU at Boston Medical Center (BMC) during the study period who develop AF with RVR whose treating clinicians decides intravenous (IV) rate control agent is necessary to manage AF with RVR
  • Patients readmitted to the MICU during the study period with recurrence of AF with RVR after conversion to sinus rhythm or prior rate control

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoners
  • Allergies to study interventions
  • Presentation consistent with acute asthma exacerbation
  • Presentation consistent with acute systolic heart failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Beta-blocker strategy
MICU patients assigned to Team Blue will receive an intravenous (IV) beta-blocker strategy to manage AF with RVR
Drug: Beta-blocker strategy
Clinicians within the intervention groups will be free to use whatever dosing amount and frequency of their assigned medication class that they deem as medically appropriate, including the decision to use intermittent IV boluses versus continuous infusions.
Other Names:
  • metoprolol or esmolol
Experimental: Calcium channel blocker strategy
MICU patients assigned to Team Red will receive an intravenous (IV) calcium channel blocker strategy to manage AF with RVR
Drug: Calcium channel blocker strategy
Clinicians within the intervention groups will be free to use whatever dosing amount and frequency of their assigned medication class that they deem as medically appropriate, including the decision to use intermittent IV boluses versus continuous infusions.
Other Names:
  • diltiazem and verapamil
Active Comparator: Physician preference strategy
MICU patients assigned to Team Green will receive a physician preference strategy with usual/standard of care interventions to manage AF with RVR
Drug: Physician preference strategy
This strategy allows for "usual care," with providers selecting their preferred rate-control agent. IV beta-blockers available through the inpatient pharmacy include metoprolol or esmolol, and IV calcium channel blockers include diltiazem and verapamil.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to assigned class of medication
Time Frame: 6 months
The proportion of patients with AF with RVR that required rate control and were treated with their assigned class of medication. The proportion will be calculated within each group as the number of patients who received their assigned class of medication divided by the total number of patients who received any treatment for rate control of AF with RVR.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average number of cases of AF with RVR occurring monthly
Time Frame: 6 months
The total number of cases of AF with RVR will be divided by the total number of MICU patients for each month of the 6 month study.
6 months
Percentage of patients who received an IV rate control agent that had AF with RVR
Time Frame: 6 months
The number of patients who received an IV rate control agent that had AF with RVR will be divided by the total number of patients who had AF with RVR. Telemetry monitoring or EKG results will be used to identify patients with AF and RVR.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Allan Walkey, MD, Pulmonary Center Boston Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 1, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H-39217

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings