Using Calcium Dobesilate to Treat Chinese Patients With Mild to Moderate Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (CALM-DR)

February 23, 2020 updated by: Zilin Sun, Zhongda Hospital

Efficacy of Calcium Dobesilate in Treating Chinese Patients With Mild to Moderate Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (CALM-DR): a Single-blind, Multicenter, Cluster-randomized, Controlled Trial

Calcium dobesilate has been recommended to treat diabetic retinopathy due to its potential in protecting against retinal vascular damage. However, there was limited evidence exploring its efficacy in combating diabetic retinopathy progression. This study, a single-blind, multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled superiority trial, was designed to evaluate whether calcium dobesilate could prevent diabetic retinopathy progression into an advanced stage among Chinese patients with mild to moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A total of 1,200 patients with mild to moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy will be enrolled and randomly assigned at a ratio of 1:1 into the control group (that is, conventional treatment group) and the intervention group (that is, conventional treatment plus calcium dobesilate [500 mg, 3 times per day] for 12 months). The severity of diabetic retinopathy will be assessed by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study scale.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
        • Department of Endocrinology, Zhongda Hospital, Institute of Diabetes, Southeast University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being diagnosed with mild to moderate diabetic retinopathy
  • Being older than 18 years
  • Being willing to attend this trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being allergic hypersensitive to experimental drugs or comparator drugs
  • Having alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase ≥2 times higher than the upper limit of normal value, or total bilirubin ≥1.5 times higher than the upper limit of normal value upon the exclusion of mild fatty liver disease
  • Having severe renal insufficiency (defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m^2)
  • Having malignant tumor and some other life-threatening diseases
  • Being in pregnancy, expecting pregnancy, or breast feeding
  • Being with unstable conditions, such as: uncontrolled high blood pressure (e.g., blood pressure >180/100 mmHg); hemoglobin A1c >8.0% or uncontrolled high blood glucose or hypoglycemia; acute cardiovascular events like unstable angina, congestive heart failure, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction within the previous 3 months; uncontrolled infection; and diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar state in the past 1 month
  • Being with glaucoma, cataracts, or other opacities that may interfere with retinal examination and fundus photography
  • Receiving laser treatment, cryo-coagulation, or vitrectomy
  • Taking drugs such as diabetic retinopathy or traditional Chinese medicine that may help to improve micro-vascular function in the past 2 weeks
  • Receiving vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in the past 4 months or will be judged to take vascular endothelial growth factor therapy because of disease progression
  • Having attended other clinical trials in the past 1 month, being attending some clinical trials, or some other conditions that were judged unfit for this trial by investigators

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: conventional treatment plus calcium dobesilate
maintain lifestyle habits and the usual treatment, plus the use of calcium dobesilate (500 mg, orally, 3 times per day) for 12 months
Drug: Calcium Dobesilate
use calcium dobesilate at the dosage of 500 mg, orally, 3 times per day, for 12 months
Other Names:
  • calcium dobesilate use
Other: conventional treatment
maintain lifestyle habits and the usual treatment
Other Names:
  • usual care
Active Comparator: conventional treatment group
maintain lifestyle habits and the usual treatment for 12 months
Other: conventional treatment
maintain lifestyle habits and the usual treatment
Other Names:
  • usual care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of the progression of diabetic retinopathy
Time Frame: from baseline to the end of treatment (12 months later)
Diabetic retinopathy progression is defined as an increase of 2 or more steps on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study scale during follow-up.
from baseline to the end of treatment (12 months later)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in eyesight
Time Frame: 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month from baseline
Changes in eyesight assessed by visual chart at 4 m by optometrists
3-month, 6-month, and 12-month from baseline
Changes in the numbers, location, and types of the retinal lesions
Time Frame: 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month from baseline
Using retinal photography to detect the changes in the numbers, location, and types of the retinal lesions at different time-points
3-month, 6-month, and 12-month from baseline
Changes in the retinal blood vessel diameter and arteriovenous ratio
Time Frame: 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month from baseline
Using photography (optic disc-centered photograph) to detect the retinal blood vessel diameter and arteriovenous ratio at different time-points
3-month, 6-month, and 12-month from baseline
Changes in metabolic biomarkers such as HbA1c
Time Frame: 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month from baseline
The metabolic biomarkers were assessed by laboratory measurement at different time-points
3-month, 6-month, and 12-month from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Zhongda Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Zilin Sun, Ph.D., Zhongda hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ZhongdaH-February

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings