Apnoea-Hypopnoea-Indices Determined Via Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Those Determined by Polysomnography (Meta IAHflow)

October 18, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Apnoea-Hypopnoea-Indices Determined Via Continuous Posi-tive Airway Pressure (AHI-CPAPflow) Versus Those Determined by Polysomnography (AHI-PSGgold): a Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

To date, no published systematic review and meta-analysis has compared AHI-CPAPflow and AHI-PSGgold. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to compare published data for AHI-PSGgold and AHI-CPAPflow in patients treated by CPAP.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The secondary objectives are to evaluate, in a manner similar to the primary objective, data for apnoea indices (AI), hypopnoea indices (HI), respiratory disturbance indices (RDI) and respiratory effort related arousals (RERAs) and to perform subgroup analyses focusing on the inclusion/exclusion of central apnoea patients, BMI levels, CPAP device brands, pressure titration modes, use of a predetermined and fixed pressure level or not, and the impact of a 4%-PSG desaturation criteria versus 3%-PSG on index accuracy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Montpellier, France, 34925
        • University Hospitals of Montpellier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients treated with a CPAP-device and synchronous polysomnography.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All (full scientific) study designs and publication types written in English and reporting Bland-Altman test results (or other tests suggesting the presence of the required data) between simultaneous, paired, polysomnography (PSG)-derived AND Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)-derived data describing sleep disordered breathing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Duplicates
  • Does not refer to a full scientific article (e.g. case reports are excluded).
  • Meta-analysis
  • Paediatric populations (populations <18 years are excluded).
  • Absence of appropriate paired results: synchronized polysomnography (PSG)-derived AND Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)-derived data must be reported for ≥1 of the following measures: Apnoea-Hypopnoea-Indices (AHI), Apnoea-Indices (AI), Hypopnoea-Indices(HI), respiratory disturbance index (RDI), respiratory effort related arousals (RERA).
  • Absence of appropriate test comparing paired results: the study must use ≥1 of the fol-lowing tests to compare the previously mentioned PSG-vs-CPAP-derived data: a bland-altman or correlation test, other conformity tests, tests of differences in centrality.
  • Inappropriate PSG scoring 1: PSG-derived variables must be coded following the American Academy of Sleep Medicine 2007 (or more recent) guidelines.
  • Inappropriate PSG scoring 2: PSG-derived variables must be scored manually.
  • Inappropriate PSG scoring 3: oxygen desaturation level used for scoring must be mentioned and at 3% or 4%.
  • Inappropriate CPAP description: brand/device names must be mentioned.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Other

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
The study population
All (full scientific) study designs and publication types written in English and reporting Bland-Altman test results (or other tests suggesting the presence of the required data) between simultaneous, paired, polysomnography (PSG)-derived AND Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)-derived data describing sleep disordered breathing.
Device: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure device deployed for at least one night synchronously with polysomnography.
Device: Polysomnography
Polysomnography deployed for at least one night synchronously with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The mean difference between AHI-CPAPflow and AHI-PSGgold
Time Frame: Day 0
AHI-CPAPflow = Apnoea-Hypopnoea-Indices Determined Via Continuous Positive Airway Pressure AHI-PSGgold = Apnoea-Hypopnoea-Indices Determined by Polysomnography
Day 0
The standard deviation for the mean difference between AHI-CPAPflow and AHI-PSGgold
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The mean difference between AI-CPAPflow and AI-PSGgold
Time Frame: Day 0
AI-CPAPflow = Apnoea--Indices Determined Via Continuous Positive Airway Pressure AI-PSGgold = Apnoea--Indices Determined by Polysomnography
Day 0
The standard deviation for the mean difference between AI-CPAPflow and AI-PSGgold
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
The mean difference between HI-CPAPflow and HI-PSGgold
Time Frame: Day 0
HI-CPAPflow = Hypopnoea--Indices Determined Via Continuous Positive Airway Pressure HI-PSGgold = Hypopnoea--Indices Determined by Polysomnography
Day 0
The standard deviation for the mean difference between HI-CPAPflow and HI-PSGgold
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
The mean difference between RDI-CPAPflow and RDI-PSGgold
Time Frame: Day 0
RDI-CPAPflow = Respiratory Disturbance Indices Determined Via Continuous Positive Airway Pressure RDI-PSGgold = Respiratory Disturbance Indices Determined by Polysomnography
Day 0
The standard deviation for the mean difference between RDI-CPAPflow and RDI-PSGgold
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
The mean difference between RERA-CPAPflow and RERA-PSGgold
Time Frame: Day 0
RERA-CPAPflow = Respiratory Effort Related Arousals Determined Via Continuous Positive Airway Pressure RERA-PSGgold = Respiratory Effort Related Arousals Determined by Polysomnography
Day 0
The standard deviation for the mean difference between RERA-CPAPflow and RERA-PSGgold
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Montpellier

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Dany Jaffuel, MD,PhD, University Hospitals of Montpellier

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 31, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 18, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RECHMPL20_0395

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Apnea Syndromes

Clinical Trials on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings