Comparing the Effectiveness of mCIMT and Bimanual Training

March 5, 2021 updated by: Hasan Bingöl, Muş Alparlan University

Comparing the Effects of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Bimanual Training in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy Mainstreamed in Regular School: A Randomized Controlled Study

This study aimed to compare the effects of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) and Bimanual Training (BIT) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, Children &Youth (ICF-CY) conceptual framework. Our assumptions were that (1) mCIMT is more effective on outcomes representing all subdomains of ICF and (2) the possible improvements in the body structure and function, activity, and participation subdomains of ICF are intimately related to each other.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Thirty-two children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy (mean age 10.43 years [SD 2.9 years]; 15 females, 17 males) whose functional profiles associated with Manual Ability Classification System, Gross Motor Function Classification System, and Communication Function Classification System changed between level I-III were randomly distributed to one of the mCIMT or BIT groups with equivalent dosing frequency and intensity (10 weeks/3 days per week/2.5 hours per day). Outcome measures categorized according to the domains of International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, Children &Youth (ICF-CY) framework were used to document body functions, activity, and participation outcomes. Assessments were carried out before (T1) and after treatment (T2), and at 16 weeks post-intervention (T3) by a physical therapist blinded to group allocation. Before the study entry, informed consent was obtained from the parents. General and specific contents related to each intervention were delivered as individual sessions at the school (one session per week) or group sessions with two participants at rehabilitation centers (two sessions per week).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Muş
      • Mus, Muş, Turkey, 49100
        • Muş Alparslan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy
  • Must be able to attend primary or secondary school

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Family-dependent problems interfering with participation in study sessions
  • The presence of behavioral problems interfering with the assessment periods or intervention sessions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy
Children's less affected hand was restricted through a mitt with a material sewn shut on the palmar face to promote the use of involved side as maximum as possible. Besides, if the participant attempted to use his/her less affected hand as an assistive, a bandage was also used to strap less affected upper limb to the trunk. Specific activities were selected according to deficit of interest, participant preference (on the condition of having potential effects on hand skills) and parent/guardian, or their teacher's request (e.g., drawing, painting, and eating). In case of activities requiring both hand use, such as stabilizing paper during the painting or holding the bricks of lego on the ground, the treating physiotherapist undertook the role of the child's dominant hand.
Other: Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy
Children's less affected hand was restricted through a mitt with a material sewn shut on the palmar face to promote the involved side's use, and unimanual gross and fine motor activities were practiced with the more affected hand. Besides, if the participant attempted to use his/her less affected hand as an assistive, a bandage was also used to strap less affected upper limb to the trunk. Specific activities were selected according to the deficit of interest, participant preference (on the condition of having potential effects on hand skills) and parent/guardian, or their teacher's request (e.g., drawing, painting, and eating).
Active Comparator: Bimanual training
BIT was administrated without any restrictive material on the non-involved upper limb, but instead, children were engaged in age-appropriate gross and fine motor bimanual activities. All targeted deficits of interest were addressed within the context of the selected activity.
Other: Bimanual Training
BIT was administrated without any restrictive material on the non-involved upper limb, but instead, children were engaged in age-appropriate gross and fine motor bimanual activities. All targeted deficits of interest were addressed within the context of the selected activity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in unimanual capacity on Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) at 16 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
The Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) is a criterion-referenced measurement tool, developed to evaluate upper extremity quality of movement in children with cerebral palsy.The Upper Extremity Skills Test has been validated for children with cerebral palsy aged 18 months to 12 years. Intra-rater reliability of the QUEST has been indicated to strong (ICC=0.96) in children with cerebral palsy aged eight and over.
Baseline and week 16
Change from baseline in manual ability on ABILHAND-Kids at 16 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
ABILHAND-Kids is developed for children with cerebral palsy and measures a child's ability to manage 21 daily activities that require the use of the upper limbs. It measures the children's typical performance in daily life. ABILHAND-Kids is useful in reporting the functional performance of children with one affected side in the perspective of manual ability and has excellent test-retest reliability for Turkish children with cerebral palsy (ICC=0. 0.98)
Baseline and week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Muş Alparlan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 79236777-050.01.04

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings