Learning to Evaluate Blood Pressure at Home (LEANBH) (LEANBH)

December 11, 2020 updated by: Fergus McCarthy, University College Cork

Implementing LEANBH Ambulatory Integrated Blood Pressure Monitoring in Maternity Services

COVID-19 has highlighted important deficiencies in our health service where front line staff and pregnant women are being exposed to SARS-Cov-2 through assessments that could be conducted using Connected Health solutions, reducing risks of contracting or disseminating SARS-Cov-2. Currently, pregnant women are not attending GPs or hospitals for BP monitoring for fear of contracting SARS-Cov-2. Uncontrolled or unmonitored hypertension in pregnancy is associated with maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study is to use home BP monitoring as an adjunct to standard care for women with borderline/suspected hypertension in pregnancy. To reduce the exposure risk for staff and pregnant women, we propose the immediate implementation of ambulatory automated self BP monitoring using the LEANBH platform- an existing integrated platform to monitor pregnant women.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The COVID-19 pandemic exposes our front-line staff to unnecessary risks in interacting with COVID-19 affected patients. Current care of pregnant women who have uncontrolled/unmonitored hypertension involves multiple visits to obstetric units for blood pressure checks. These visits put the women at risk of contracting or transmitting SARS-CoV-2 by bringing them into hospitals for checks which could otherwise be done remotely. Up to 20% of pregnant women will experience a hypertensive episode during pregnancy or the postpartum period. Uncontrolled or unmonitored hypertension in pregnancy may be associated with significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality including pre-eclampsia, stroke and stillbirth. The current management of suspected hypertension in pregnancy involves prolonged admission to hospital for BP monitoring or multiple visits to day assessment units or primary care physicians. All of these increase the risk of contracting or transmitting SARS-CoV-2. In addition, pregnant women with COVID-19 who are receiving inpatient care also require regular BP monitoring increasing the exposure risk for staff of contracting SARS-CoV-2. Pregnant women not attending GPs or hospitals for BP monitoring out of fear of contracting COVID-19 drastically increase their risk of suffering adverse effects from undiagnosed or uncontrolled hypertension. The ideal solution would be to facilitate inpatient or outpatient monitoring with reduced face to face contact between staff and infected patients. This would ensure a safer experience for all by reducing the risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 while safely offering remote BP monitoring. LEANBH offers this safe alternative to direct hospital contact for pregnant women and staff by providing ambulatory automated self BP monitoring using the LEANBH integrated platform. This proposal will deliver immediate ambulatory BP self-monitoring performed remotely without need for direct physical contact, minimising risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 for staff and pregnant women.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women with an ongoing, confirmed intrauterine pregnancy who have borderline high blood pressure or are at risk of developing high blood pressure in this pregnancy and are due to give birth in Cork University Maternity Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or over.
  • Ability to give informed consent.
  • Mobile application compatible smartphone.
  • Increased requirement for blood pressure monitoring in this pregnancy as determined by their treating obstetric team.
  • Between 12 weeks of pregnancy and up to six weeks postpartum

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent (language barrier)
  • Confirmed Preeclampsia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant Satisfaction
Time Frame: 12-42 weeks gestation
The primary outcome measure will be participant satisfaction with home blood pressure monitoring. Once a participant completes the LEANBH Study, an online system usability scale will be sent to all participants. This questionnaire contains 35 questions which will accurately capture user experience and satisfaction while participating in the study.
12-42 weeks gestation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Escalation
Time Frame: 12-42 weeks gestation
The secondary outcome measure is the clinical escalation offered to participants as part of the LEANBH study. Home BP readings will be reviewed daily and clinical escalation offered when appropriate throughout the study.
12-42 weeks gestation
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 weeks gestation - 6 weeks postpartum
Preeclampsia, Preterm Delivery, IUGR, Postnatal Hospital Stay and Admission to NNU will all be considered as adverse events for the purpose of this study.
12 weeks gestation - 6 weeks postpartum

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University College Cork

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Science Foundation Ireland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 19, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 28, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FMC01UCC2020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings