Options on the Breast Reconstruction Timing and Method After Removal of Polyacrylamide Hydrogel
Options of Breast Reconstruction Timing and Method After Removing of Polyacrylamide Hydrogel: a Propensity Score-matched Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The primary purposes of this study are to:
- Compare the safety and effectiveness of IBR vs DBR after PAAG removal;
- Compare the safety and effectiveness of breast implants with silicone gel prosthesis vs autologous fat transplantation after PAAG removal;
- Evaluate the clinical characteristics associated with and rates of complications based on reconstruction timing and type.
The secondary purposes of this study are to:
- Explore and summarize the characteristics of long-term complications of PAAG injection for breast augmentation;
- Compare the rate of postoperative complications and reoperations between the patients who had breast reconstruction with implants and patients who had primary breast augmentation with implants.
- Further refine the algorithm for breast reconstruction in patients with PAAG injections.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310003
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- history of PAAG breast injection;
- appeal to remove the gel;
- availability of complete medical records;
- accepting the potential complications of the operation and breast deformity after gel removal.
- agreeing with medical history data collection, clinical follow-up investigation, and independent Complete the questionnaire.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who had other breast diseases;
- Patients who failed to follow the standard diagnosis, treatment and follow-up;
- Lost to follow-up due to various reasons or incomplete medical records;
- Patients with cognitive disorders such as mental illness, understanding, memory, or orientation, and other serious diseases.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
PAAG removal + Immediate implant reconstruction
Patients who had a one-stage operation comprising gel removal and immediate breast reconstruction.
|
Because most fillers are under the mammary gland, it is better to place the prosthesis into the opening under the pectoralis major muscle, which avoids contact between the prosthesis and the residual hydrogel to reduce the chance of infection.
If postoperative complications disappear and imaging shows no filler remnants after more than 3-month follow-up, secondary breast augmentation can be planned.
For placement of the prosthesis, the plane under the pectoralis major is preferred, which avoids prosthesis contact with the residual hydrogel to thus reduce the chance of infection.
Other Names:
|
|
PAAG removal + Delayed implant reconstruction
Patients who had a two-stage operation comprising gel removal and delayed breast reconstruction at least 3 months later.
The first included maximal gel removal and purulent tissue debridement, if necessary.
Thereafter, patients were invited for a clinical follow-up and discussion about DBR 3 months later.
The latter was offered as a second stage in those opting for it.
|
The first stage included maximal gel removal and purulent tissue debridement, if necessary.
Thereafter, patients were invited for a clinical follow-up and discussion about DBR 3 months later.
The latter was offered as a second stage in those opting for it.
Other Names:
|
|
PAAG removal + No breast reconstruction
Patients who only underwent surgical PAAG removal without breast reconstruction.
|
|
|
PAAG removal + Delayed autologous fat grafting reconstruction
Patients who underwent a two-stage operation comprising surgical PAAG removal and autologous fat injection at least 3months later.
Usually, the amount of transplanted fat was 150-200mL/side.
A multilayer and multi-tunnel injection method was commonly used.
|
Because fat injection after PAAG removal has a high infection risk, it is recommended to be conducted after 3-6 months of follow-up.
The advantage of autologous fat transplantation is its ability to repair a variety of breast shape deformities caused by PAAG removal.
Fat injections may need to be repeated several times.
The interval between injections should be at least 3 months.
Usually, the amount of transplanted fat is 150-200 mL/side.
A multilayer and multi-tunnel injection method is commonly used.
Other Names:
|
|
PAAG removal + breast reconstruction with implants
Patients who underwent surgical PAAG removal with immediate or delayed implant breast reconstruction.
|
|
|
Primary breast augmentation with implants
Patients who had undergone conventional breast augmentation(BA) with implants during the study period who matched the study cohort by age(±5 years).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the occurrence of a postoperative complication
Time Frame: until 10 years post operation
|
Complications are defined as any adverse postoperative events directly related to gel removal or breast reconstruction surgery that require further treatment.
According to the patient's main complaint, physical examination, chest radiography, breast ultrasound, breast mammography or MRI, pathological biopsy and other methods to evaluate the complications.
According to the degree of complications, they were further divided into: (1) Mild complications: conservative treatment without surgical treatment.
(2) Severe complications: the incidence of complications requiring reoperations or implant removal/replacement operations.
|
until 10 years post operation
|
|
The probability of reoperations
Time Frame: until 10 years post operation
|
Reoperation was defined as a surgical event performed after PAAG removal alone or stage I and II reconstruction.
An anticipated operation of delayed breast implantation in patients with two-stage surgery was not classified as reoperation.
|
until 10 years post operation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient-reported quality of life, QOL
Time Frame: until 1 year post operation
|
Patient-reported quality of life using Breast-Q score to evaluate changes in breast appearance, mental health, physical health and sexual health satisfaction before and after surgery.
|
until 1 year post operation
|
|
Aesthetic evaluation
Time Frame: until 1 year post operation
|
It was evaluated by the Aesthetic Items Scale, which was a standardized tool for evaluating the aesthetic effect of breast reconstruction surgery, which was first proposed by Visser and Brinkman.
The specific method was as follows: 3 experienced plastic surgeons evaluate 5 standardized photos (front, oblique, and side) of the patient before and after surgery.
All photos were organized into slides and displayed randomly, with other information hidden (Such as preoperative or postoperative state, reconstruction method used, complications or whether to perform a second operation, etc.).
In order to minimize the deviation, blank slides were displayed between the photos, and the random order of the photos of each observer was different.
Each doctor used a five-point Likert scale to score breast volume, shape, symmetry, scars, and nipple areola.
In addition, each doctor gave an overall satisfaction score between 0-10 points based on pre- and post-operative photos.
|
until 1 year post operation
|
|
change in patient satisfaction
Time Frame: until 1 year post operation
|
Patient satisfaction consisted of four structured questions that assessed satisfaction with the size, shape, symmetry, and sensitivity of the breast.
Patients were asked to rate their final result as "good", "satisfactory", "poor" or "bad".
|
until 1 year post operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IIT20200748A
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Breast Reconstruction
-
NCT06013514RecruitingBreast Augmentation | Breast Reconstruction | Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy | Breast Reconstruction Surgery | Breast Implants | Breast Revision | Breast Reconstruction With Silicone Implants | Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy
-
NCT02724371Active, not recruitingBreast Reconstruction | Revision Breast Reconstruction
-
NCT04293146Active, not recruitingBreast Reconstruction | Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction (IBBR)
-
NCT02919592Active, not recruitingPrimary Breast Augmentation | Primary Breast Reconstruction | Revision Breast Augmentation | Revision Breast Reconstruction
-
NCT06216106CompletedBreast Reconstruction | Radiation Therapy Complication | Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
-
NCT00690339CompletedBreast Augmentation | Breast Reconstruction | Revision of Augmentation or Reconstruction
-
NCT00689871CompletedBreast Augmentation | Breast Reconstruction | Revision of Augmentation or Reconstruction
-
NCT06627582Active, not recruitingBreast Reconstruction | Mastectomy | Postmastectomy Pain | Mastectomy Patient | Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction | Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy
-
NCT03386682Active, not recruitingBreast Augmentation | Breast Reconstruction
-
NCT04261608CompletedBreast Augmentation | Breast Reconstruction
Clinical Trials on Immediate breast reconstruction with implant
-
NCT03959709RecruitingBreast Cancer | Mastectomy
-
NCT04245930RecruitingImplant Breast Reconstruction | TiLOOP® Bra Mesh | Bovine Pericardial Patch
-
NCT04808765UnknownBreast Cancer | Breast Reconstruction
-
NCT06112977Enrolling by invitationBreast Cancer | Risk Reduction
-
NCT07059104RecruitingBreast Cancer | Weight Loss | Breast Reconstruction | Surgical Complication | Bariatric Surgery | Breast Implant Infection | Breast Implant | Mastopexy
-
NCT02061527Completed
-
NCT04842240RecruitingBreast Cancer | Surgery | Patient Satisfaction | Breast Disease
-
NCT03135392WithdrawnBreast Reconstruction | Mastectomy
-
NCT03143335UnknownBreast Reconstruction