Augmented Infant Resuscitator to Enhance Newborn Ventilation (AIR)
Augmented Infant Resuscitator (AIR): Transitioning a Novel Behavior Change Innovation to Drive Newborn Ventilation Skills Enhancement
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Midwives, nurses, respiratory therapists, pediatricians, and neonatologists working as birth attendants in select hospitals in Uganda and the U.S. who are either previous trained in Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) and/or have a current Newborn Resuscitation Program (NRP) certification.
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Blinded to visual feedback from AIR device
Providers did not receive AIR device feedback during newborn mannequin ventilation
|
Device provides no visual feedback to clinician but records data on ventilation effectiveness
|
|
Experimental: Not blinded to visual feedback from AIR device
Providers did receive AIR device feedback during newborn mannequin ventilation
|
Device provides visual feedback related to air leak, obstruction, hyperventilation, hypoventilation, and harsh breaths
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Effective bag-mask ventilation
Time Frame: 2 minutes
|
Duration of effective bag-mask ventilation by clinician during a 2-minute trial.
[This will be a cumulative duration of the two minutes.
This is measured internally from the AIR device.
"Effective ventilation" is defined as having all three of the following conditions simultaneously: (1) Correct rate (30-60 breaths per minute); (2) Absence of significant leak (compliance >4.0mL/cm H2O); and (3) Absence of a significant airway blockage (defined as compliance <0.10 mL/cm H2O or resistance >90 cmH2O/L/s).
These measurements are determined by sensors in the AIR device for both arms of the study.
Their accuracy for manikin use was determined to be 100% in the following trial: Bennett el al. Anesth Analgesia.
2018 Mar;126(3):947-955.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002432.]
|
2 minutes
|
|
Time to effective bag-mask ventilation
Time Frame: 2 minutes
|
How long it takes for clinician to achieve effective ventilation during 2-minute trial.
[This is time from when the mask first touches the face of the manikin until all three icons are green.
This is measured by a Research Assistant using a stop-watch.
Again, "Effective ventilation" is defined as having all three of the following conditions simultaneously and is indicated to the RA by all three icons on the AIR device turning green: (1) Correct rate (30-60 breaths per minute); (2) Absence of significant leak (compliance >4.0mL/cm H2O); and (3) Absence of a significant airway blockage (defined as compliance <0.10 mL/cm H2O or resistance >90 cmH2O/L/s).
These measurements are determined by sensors in the AIR device for both arms of the study.
Their accuracy for manikin use was determined to be 100% in the following trial: Bennett et al.
Anesth Analgesia 2018 Mar;126(3):947-955.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002432.]
|
2 minutes
|
|
Clinician's correct assessment of mannequin airway issues
Time Frame: 2 minutes
|
Ability of clinician to correctly assess three different manikin airway issues: normal, air leak, or obstruction.
[Manikin "conditions" are blinded to the participants and were either normal (as supplied by the manufacturer, had a "leak" insert (introduced compliance >4mL/cm H2O), or had an "obstruction" insert (introduced a reduction in compliance <0.10mL/cm H2O and resistance >90 cm H2O/L/s.
As per the parameters in the following paper: Bennett et al.
Anesth Analgesia.
2018 Mar;126(3):947-955.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002432.]
|
2 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2013P002204
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.