Rituximab Maintenance Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma After BR or RCHOP or R2: a Multicenter Clinical Study

April 10, 2021 updated by: Zhao Weili, Ruijin Hospital

Rituximab Maintenance Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma After Induction Therapy of Rituximab Combined With Bendamustine (BR) or Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, Prednisone (RCHOP) or Lenalidomide (R2): a Multicenter Clinical Study

This multi-center clinical study will evaluate the efficacy of Rituximab maintenance treatment of newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma after induction therapy of BR, RCHOP or R2.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a lymphoma of B cells in follicular center. It is a common pathological subtype of lymphoma, and its incidence rate is only next to diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The initial remission rate is high, but the tumor generally recurrent, making it difficult to be completely cured. This study attempts to explore the efficacy and safety of rituximab monotherapy maintenance after BR, RCHOP, R2 regimen induction therapy in the treatment of follicular patients, and to find the best way to maximize survival benefit and reduce treatment toxicity for FL patients. The study can improve the quality of life, prolong the survival and avoid the transformation to invasive lymphoma in patients with follicular lymphoma.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
789

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
      • Shanghai, China
        • Recruiting
        • Ruijin Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pathologically confirmed CD20 positive follicular lymphoma grade 1, 2, or 3A based on 2016 WHO classification
  • Treatment naive
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Indications for treatment confirmed
  • Must has measurable lesion in CT or PET-CT prior to treatment
  • Considered suitable for RCHOP, BR or R2 regimens
  • Informed consented

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Transformed follicular lymphoma or 3B follicular lymphoma;
  • HBsAg positive and / or HBcAb positive with HBV DNA titer; HCV antibody positive with HCV-RNA; or HIV positive
  • Central nervous system or meninges involved
  • Any drug contraindication in the treatment plan
  • Patients judged by other researchers to be unsuitable for inclusion in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: BR+R
Induction Therapy: Rituximab Combined With Bendamustine Maintenance Treatment: Rituximab
Drug: BR for 6 cycles +R for 8 cycles
The patients will be given Bendamustine (90mg/m2 d1,2, every 28 days for total 6 courses) combined with Rituximab (375mg/m2 d0, every 28 days for total 6 courses) followed by Rituximab (375mg/m2 d1, every 3 months for total 8 courses)
Experimental: RCHOP+R
Induction Therapy: Rituximab Combined With Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, Prednisone Maintenance Treatment: Rituximab
Drug: RCHOP for 6 cycles +R for 8 cycles
The patients will be given RCHOP (Rituximab 375mg/m2 ivgtt, D0, Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, ivgtt D1, doxorubicin 50mg/m2,ivgtt D1, Vincristine 1.4mg/m2（max 2mg）, ivgtt D1 Prednisone 60mg/m2 （max 100mg）,PO,D1-D5 every 21 days for total 6 courses) followed by Rituximab (375mg/m2 d1, every 3 months for total 8 courses)
Experimental: R2+R2
Induction Therapy: Lenalidomide Combined With Rituximab Maintenance Treatment: Lenalidomide Combined With Rituximab
Drug: R2 for 6 cycles + R2 maintenance
The patients will be given Lenalidomide (25mg/d, po, D1-10, every 21 days for total 6 courses) combined with Rituximab (375mg/m2 d0, every 21 days for total 6 courses) followed by Lenalidomide (25mg/d, po, D1-10, every 28 days for total 6 courses) combined with Rituximab (375mg/m2 d1, every 3 months for total 8 courses)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MRD negative rate of bone marrow at 24 weeks
Time Frame: At 24 weeks
Percentage of participants with negative MRD estimated by q-RT-PCR of bone marrow
At 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after completion of study treatment
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events
Up to 30 days after completion of study treatment
Overall survival
Time Frame: Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years)
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date of death from any cause. Reported is the percentage of participants with event. of disease progression or relapse, using 2014 Lugano criteria,or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years)
Overall response rate
Time Frame: 21 days after 6 cycles of induction therapy (each cycle is 21 days)
Percentage of participants with overall response was determined on the basis of investigator assessments according to 2014 Lugano criteria
21 days after 6 cycles of induction therapy (each cycle is 21 days)
Progression of disease within 24 months
Time Frame: Baseline up to data cut-off (24 months)
Progression of disease within 24 months was defined as the rate of disease progression or relapse, using 2014 Lugano criteria, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Baseline up to data cut-off (24 months)
Event-free survival
Time Frame: Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years)
Event-free survival was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis until the date of the first documented day of events.
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years)
Time to Progression
Time Frame: Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years)
Time to Progression was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis until the date of the first documented day of disease progression, using 2014 Lugano criteria, whichever occurred first.
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years)
Duration of response
Time Frame: Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years)
Duration of response was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis until the date of the first documented day of disease relapse, using 2014 Lugano criteria, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years)
Time to Next Anti-lymphoma Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years)
Time to Next Anti-lymphoma Treatment was defined as the time from the date of first treatment until the date patients need to receive next anti-lymphoma treatment on the basis of investigator assessments according to 2014 Lugano criteria
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years)
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis until the date of the first documented day of disease progression or relapse, using 2014 Lugano criteria, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years)
MRD negative rate of peripheral blood at 24 weeks
Time Frame: At 24 weeks
Percentage of participants with negative MRD estimated by q-RT-PCR of peripheral blood
At 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ruijin Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FL-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Follicular Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on BR for 6 cycles +R for 8 cycles

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings