Compare the Effect of Eupatilin and Rebamipide on the Prevention of Gastroenteropathy (CEERS)

May 7, 2021 updated by: Hyoun Woo Kang, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital

Compare the Effect of Eupatilin and Rebamipide on the Prevention of Gastroenteropathy in Patients With NSAIDs and Low Dose Steroid: A Single-center, Randomized, Open Labeled, Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of eupatilin on the prevention of gastroenteropathy in patients with NSAIDs and low dose steroid by comparing with rebamipide.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

After being informed of the study and potential risks, all patients giving written informed consents will undergo a 1-week screening period to determine eligibility for study entry. During screening period, patients will undergo fecal calprotectin test, upper endoscopy and submit symptom diary. At week 0, subjects who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized in a open labeled manner in 1:1 ratio to eupatilin (90mg twice daily-test group, 25 patients) or rebamipide (100mg three times daily-control group paients) for 8 weeks. At week 8, subjects undergo fecal calprotectin test, upper endoscopy and submit symptom diary.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women who were adults at the time of receipt of written consent (age 19-70)
  2. Those with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or other musculoskeletal diseases that require continuous administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and oral steroids for more than 8 weeks.
  3. At screening (before baseline) endoscopy results Modified Lanza Score (MLS) 0~2
  4. Those who have not had severe gastrointestinal symptoms in the previous 3 months[Excluding mild abdominal distention, abdominal pain, diarrhea, dyspepsia, nausea, and vomiting]
  5. A person who agrees to participate in this clinical trial and voluntarily signs a written consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Those with a history of gastrointestinal surgery (excluding appendectomy)
  2. Those who have a history of esophageal cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, colon cancer, small intestine tumor or other malignant disease within 5 years from the time of screening
  3. Gastrointestinal diseases that are clinically significant by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, namely active peptic ulcer, reflux esophagitis, gastroesophageal varices, Barrett's esophagus, Barrett's esophagitis, esophageal stenosis, inflammatory bowel disease (Those diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease, IBD), gastrointestinal bleeding, etc.
  4. Those with a history of recurrent gastrointestinal ulcer/perforation
  5. Those with cerebrovascular bleeding or confirmed systemic bleeding disorder
  6. Persons with severe uncontrolled heart failure (NYHA Class III-IV), high blood pressure (above 160/100 mmHg)
  7. Those who have plans for surgical operation during the clinical trial period
  8. Persons with a history of chronic pancreatitis, chronic renal diseases, chronic liver diseases, or other serious comorbid diseases
  9. Those with clinically significant abnormal values (AST, ALT, BUN, Cr exceeding 2.5 times or Hb<10g/dL) by laboratory examination
  10. Those with a history of alcohol or drug abuse/dependence
  11. Pregnant and lactating women
  12. Those who participated in other clinical trials within 30 days prior to participation in this clinical trial and received investigational drugs or received procedures
  13. Patients who are difficult to perform this clinical trial by other investigators or who are judged to have medical findings that are not suitable for the clinical trial
  14. Those who received celecoxib and prednisolone (or methylprednisolone) within 30 days prior to participation in this clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: eupatilin
take eupatilin to prevent NSAID induced gastroenteropathy
Drug: Eupatilin
take eupatilin to prevent NSAID induced gastroenteropathy
Active Comparator: rebamipide
take rebamipide to prevent NSAID induced gastroenteropathy
Drug: Rebamipide
take rebamipide to prevent NSAID induced gastroenteropathy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with gastric damage
Time Frame: evaluated at day 56
Percentage of patients with endoscopic Modified Lanza Score >3
evaluated at day 56

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of gastric erosion number
Time Frame: evaluated at day 0 and day 56
Change of gastric erosion number at day 56 compared with that at day 0
evaluated at day 0 and day 56
Change of Modified Lanza Score
Time Frame: evaluated at 0 day and day 56
Change of Modified Lanza Score at day 56 compared with that at day 0
evaluated at 0 day and day 56
Change of duodenal erosion number
Time Frame: evaluated at day 0 and day 56
Change of duodenal erosion number at day 56 compared with that at day 0
evaluated at day 0 and day 56
Gastrointestinal symptom
Time Frame: evaluated at day 0 and day 56
Gastrointestinal symptom change using survey at day 56 compared with that at day 0
evaluated at day 0 and day 56
Fecal calprotectin
Time Frame: evaluated at day 0 and day 56
Fecal calprotectin level change at visit 3 compared with visit 0
evaluated at day 0 and day 56
Antioxidant gene expression
Time Frame: evaluated at day 0 and day 56
Antioxidant gene expression change at day 56 compared with that at day 0
evaluated at day 0 and day 56

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seoul National University Boramae Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Dong-A ST Co., Ltd.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Eupatilin_GEP_01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings