Application of Polygenic Methylation Markers in Postoperative Recurrence Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer

July 28, 2025 updated by: Singlera Genomics Inc.

Based on the Application of Peripheral Blood Polygene Methylation Markers in Postoperative Recurrence Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer

This study dynamically monitored the prognosis of stage I-IV colorectal cancer patients who could receive radical surgical resection by detecting the levels of polygene methylation in plasma samples from patients with colorectal cancer. In patients with colorectal cancer feasible radical surgery, plasma ctDNA methylation detection was performed before and after surgical treatment and during regular follow-up to explore the predictive effect of plasma ctDNA methylation status at different time points on postoperative recurrence. To explore whether postoperative dynamic monitoring of plasma ctDNA methylation can be used for adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy evaluation and whether it can indicate tumor recurrence and metastasis earlier than imaging examination.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

  1. Patients initially diagnosed with primary colorectal cancer were enrolled for screening, and plasma samples 1-2 days before radical bowel resection were collected for polygene methylation detection.
  2. The postoperative follow-up was 2 years, and the reexamination included CT/MRI imaging assessment, blood CEA, and dynamic monitoring of plasma ctDNA methylation level. Blood samples were collected for 9 times.
  3. Results analysis: To explore the application value of ctDNA methylation-MRD detection in the prediction of postoperative tumor recurrence risk after radical resection of colorectal cancer; The correlation between preoperative ctDNA methylation level and prognosis of early colorectal cancer.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Chengdu, China
        • West China Hospital
      • Guangzhou, China
        • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
      • Haerbin, China
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
      • Shanghai, China
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University/ Changhai Hospital
      • Shenzhen, China
        • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen Center
      • Taiyuan, China
        • Shanxi Cancer hospital (Shanxi Cancer institute)
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100029
        • Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

800 patients with initial clinical diagnosis of primary colorectal cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Newly diagnosed patients with primary colorectal cancer confirmed by histopathology (no restriction on histological type);
  2. Patients diagnosed as stage I-III and feasible for radical bowel surgery;
  3. Patients diagnosed by stage IV (only colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis at the time of diagnosis) and feasible radical bowel resection or complete resection of liver metastasis;
  4. No gender limitation, age ≥18;
  5. ECOG score ≤1;
  6. Life expectancy ≥5 years;
  7. Those who fully understand the study and voluntarily sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Blood transfusion was performed during surgery or 2 weeks before surgery;
  2. complicated with primary malignant tumors of other organs;
  3. With colonic obstruction, intestinal perforation and other symptoms requiring emergency treatment;
  4. Colorectal cancer was diagnosed with extrahepatic metastasis;
  5. Neoadjuvant therapy (such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy) before radical bowel resection;
  6. Radical bowel resection was performed after endoscopic surgery;
  7. Concomitant symptoms and/or family history collection suggest hereditary colorectal cancer;
  8. serious mental illness or drug abuse;
  9. patients with serious heart, lung and vascular diseases who cannot tolerate surgery;
  10. pregnant or lactating women;
  11. Participate in other interventional clinical investigators within 3 months
  12. Poor compliance, unable to complete the study according to the judgment of the researcher.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
MRD positive group
ColonAiQ polygene methylation test was performed on peripheral blood plasma samples from the enrolled patients 4 weeks after surgery. If gene methylation levels in the samples exceeded the threshold, the patients were enrolled in the MRD positive group. The 2-year total tumor recurrence rate of patients in the MRD positive group was calculated, and the positive prediction rate of postoperative plasma ctDNA methylation-MRD detection results for 2-year tumor recurrence rate after colorectal cancer radical resection was calculated.
MRD negative group
ColonAiQ polygene methylation test was performed on peripheral blood plasma samples from the enrolled patients 4 weeks after surgery. If the gene methylation level detected in the samples did not exceed the threshold, the patients were enrolled in the MRD negative group. The 2-year total tumor recurrence rate of patients in the negative MRD group was calculated, and the negative prediction rate of postoperative plasma ctDNA methylation-MRD test results for 2-year tumor recurrence rate after radical resection of colorectal cancer was calculated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To investigate the prediction and monitoring effect of plasma ctDNA methylation on postoperative recurrence of primary colorectal cancer patients after radical surgery
Time Frame: assessed up to 36 months
To investigate the role of peripheral plasma ctDNA methylation level at different time points in the monitoring of disease recurrence after radical bowel resection for primary colorectal cancer, the multi-gene methylation detection of peripheral plasma ctDNA was conducted before, after and during the postoperative follow-up period.
assessed up to 36 months
To establish a clinical cohort for colorectal cancer
Time Frame: assessed up to 36 months
It is expected that 800 patients with primary colorectal cancer diagnosed clinically will be enrolled for screening. Plasma samples 1-2 days before radical bowel resection will be collected for ColonAiQ polygene methylation test. Follow-up will be conducted 2 years after surgical resection, including CT/MRI imaging evaluation and blood CEA, etc. And dynamic monitoring of plasma ctDNA methylation level. Blood samples were collected for 9 times.
assessed up to 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Singlera Genomics Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rui Liu, Doctor, Singlera Genomics Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 28, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Protector-C

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings