Semaglutide Treatment in the Real-world for Fibrosis Due to NAFLD in Obesity and T2DM (SAMARA)

September 1, 2023 updated by: Rohit Loomba, University of California, San Diego
Conduct a community intervention study that will 1) validate a screening approach to identify patients at risk for advanced NAFLD in the obese or T2DM population, and 2) test whether semaglutide treatment is effective for the management of significant fibrosis due to NAFLD in high-risk patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects approximately 25-30% of the global population and is projected to become the leading cause of liver transplantation in the United States by 2030. Development of efficient screening strategies for the identification and treatment of individuals who are at greatest risk for advanced disease in this population is an urgent and unmet medical need. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity are critical risk factors for advanced NAFLD. In a prospective cross-sectional study of patients with type 2 diabetes, we screened 524 participants (50-80 years old) with type 2 diabetes mellitus for the presence of NAFLD and observed relative prevalences of 70% for steatosis and 15% for advanced fibrosis. The presence of obesity in this population further increased the odds of advanced fibrosis. These findings suggest that screening populations of individuals with obesity or T2DM may be an effective strategy for identifying high-risk patients with NAFLD. Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) that is FDA-approved for the treatment of obesity (as Wegovy) or T2DM (as Ozempic), conditions that are considered major risk factors for advanced fibrosis in the NAFLD population. It is unclear, however, whether semaglutide is effective for treatment of fibrosis due to NAFLD in these populations. Here, the investigators propose to conduct a community intervention study that will 1) validate a screening approach to identify patients at risk for advanced NAFLD in the obese or T2DM population, and 2) test whether semaglutide treatment is effective for the management of significant fibrosis due to NAFLD in high-risk patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, San Diego
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Adult, age ≥ 40 and < 80 years

  2. Participant must meet at least one of following sets of conditions:

    1. BMI ≥ 27 kg/m² OR
    2. BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² AND presence of i) pre-diabetes (HbA1C ≥ 5.7) or ii) type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), as defined by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) clinical practice recommendations.

    The ADA definition of T2DM is applicable if one of the following criteria is met:

    • Presence of diabetes symptoms (polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia, increased fatigue, weight loss, blurred vision) and casual plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L)
    • Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/L)
    • Plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)⁶⁸. If any of the above test results occur, testing should be repeated on a different day to confirm the diagnosis.

    OR

    • Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) ≥ 6.5% ⁶⁹.

  3. FAST score ≥ 0.5 and VCTE ≥ 8.0 kPa; FAST score threshold based on data from MAESTRO-NASH trial⁴²; VCTE cutpoint based on AASLD guidelines for identification of patients with significant fibrosis risk.
  4. Participants without a VCTE assessment in their medical record may qualify for the study if they have a FIB-4 ≥ 1.0, which is a cutpoint based on observations of patients with T2DM in Ajmera et al³⁰, and VCTE ≥ 8.0 kPa.
  5. The subject is fully informed and willing and able to perform all the procedures specified in the protocol and has signed a written informed consent to participate

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Presence of regular and/or excessive use of alcohol, defined as > 30 g/day for males and > 20 g/day for females, for a period longer than 2 years at any time in the last 10 years
  2. Evidence of cirrhosis or previously known cirrhosis, based on the results from previous liver biopsy or history of portal hypertension presented by ascites, hepatic encephalopathy or varices
  3. VCTE ≥ 20 kPa
  4. Platelet count ≤ 140,000 per Ml
  5. Albumin < 3.6 g/dL
  6. INR > 1.35, unless on coumadin for another indication
  7. Serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL
  8. eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m² as defined according to the CKDEPI creatinine equation⁷⁰
  9. Use of other weight loss medications, including GLP1RA within the last 90 days
  10. Greater than 10% weight loss in the prior six months
  11. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to GLP1RA medications including semaglutide
  12. History of bariatric surgery within the past 5 years or expected bariatric surgery

  13. Evidence of other causes of chronic liver disease including:

    1. Hepatitis B, as defined as presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).
    2. Previous or current infection with Hepatitis C, as defined by presence of hepatitis C virus Ab in serum (anti-HCV Ab).
    3. Autoimmune hepatitis, as defined by anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) of 1:160 or greater and liver histology consistent with autoimmune hepatitis or previous response to immunosuppressive therapy.
    4. Autoimmune cholestatic liver disorders, as defined by elevation of alkaline phosphatase and anti- mitochondrial antibody of greater than 1:80 or liver histology consistent with primary biliary cirrhosis or elevation of alkaline phosphatase and liver histology consistent with sclerosing cholangitis.
    5. Wilson disease, as defined by ceruloplasmin below the limits of normal and liver histology consistent with Wilson disease deficiency, as defined by alpha-1-antitrypsin phenotype and liver histology consistent with alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Semaglutide
2.4 mg weekly for 52 weekly in a 3 ml PDS290 pen-injector containing Semaglutide 3.0 mg/ml for subcutaneous use
Drug: Semaglutide
Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) that is FDA-approved for the treatment of obesity (as Wegovy) or T2DM (as Ozempic).
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
2.4 mg weekly for 52 weekly in a 3 ml PDS290 pen-injector containing 3.0 mg/ml of a placebo solution for subcutaneous use
Drug: Placebo
Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fibrosis due to NAFLD
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Change in fibrosis due to Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), as measured by change in FAST Score, which combines FibroScan results with aspartate aminotransferase (AST).
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in liver stiffness
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Change in liver stiffness, as measured by change in Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography
52 weeks
Change in steatosis
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Change in steatosis, as measure by a change in proton density fat fraction or controlled attenuation parameter
52 weeks
Change in ALT
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Change in ALT, as measured by a change in patients with ALT >= 30 U/L at baseline
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, San Diego

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rohit Loomba, University of California, San Diego

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 1, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NRC-2023-1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Obese

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings