Comparative Study Between Millard and Tennison Randall Techniques in Complete and Incomplete Cleft Lip Repair.

December 20, 2023 updated by: Sherif Abdelnaser Ibrahim, Assiut University
"the investigators will compare the quantitative and qualitative (functional and aesthetic outcomes) of these two surgical approaches for repair of the unilateral cleft lip using an evaluation protocol developed many years ago by the research council of Operation Smile, a non- profit organization based in Virginia Beach, USA. Operation Smile delivers charity management of cleft lip and palate cases in many different developing countries around the world. Under this protocol, a dual rating system has been developed with two scores: one preoperative score concerning the severity of cleft and one score for the postoperative results.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

One of the common congenital malformations in the head and neck is cleft lips. The prevalence of cleft lip is about 1:1000 of live birth; it also more common in boys and tends to present on the left side with a 6:3:1 ratio of left to right to bilateral. Many facial malformations, including cleft lip, are linked with environmental, maternal, and genetic factors, such as exposure to teratogen drugs, including isotretinoin, alcohol, or anticonvulsants. Similarly, some habits or diseases during pregnancy increase the risk of the cleft lip as smoking, pregestational and gestational diabetes, and specific nutritional deficiencies. The treatment begins soon after the child's birth and continues until adulthood. The purpose of cleft treatment is aesthetic and functional rehabilitation. Surgical repair is important for facial growth preservation, normal speech formation and development of proper dentition. The less number of interventions, the less the scaring results and hence, growth retardation Nowadays, the most commonly used techniques in managing unilateral cleft lip (UCL) are Millard's rotation advancement and Tennison Randall's triangular flap repairs. This study aimed to use anthropometric analysis by anthropometric measurements taken pre and post operation to evaluate the quantitative assessment of the modified Millard technique compared with the Tennison Randall technique in UCL repair.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with complete and incomplete unilateral cleft lip.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients are generally fit
  • Patients with unilateral with or without cleft palate
  • Patients with compliance for follow up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Syndromic cases.
  • Patients are generally unfit.
  • Secondary cleft lip.
  • Age less than 3 months, more than 4 years
  • Bilateral cleft lip.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Group I
Patients who will be subjected to Millard Technique
Procedure: Millard and Tension Randal Technique
Millard recognized that the majority of Cupid's bow, one philtral column, and the philtral dimple were intact on the medial aspect of a unilateral cleft lip but required rotation to shift the tissue into a normal anatomic position (Millard, 1964b) The Tennison-Randall technique involves a back-cut that extends from the cleft Cupid's bow peak toward the center of the philtrum that is filled by a laterally based triangular flap whose width is the measured deficiency in lip height.
Group II
patients who will be subjected to Tension Randal
Procedure: Millard and Tension Randal Technique
Millard recognized that the majority of Cupid's bow, one philtral column, and the philtral dimple were intact on the medial aspect of a unilateral cleft lip but required rotation to shift the tissue into a normal anatomic position (Millard, 1964b) The Tennison-Randall technique involves a back-cut that extends from the cleft Cupid's bow peak toward the center of the philtrum that is filled by a laterally based triangular flap whose width is the measured deficiency in lip height.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
functional and aesthetic outcomes after repair
Time Frame: 6 months
two scores: one preoperative score concerning the severity of cleft and one score for the Assessment of the results based on the post-operative scoring sheet included items for evaluating the integrity and symmetry of the Cupid's bow, nasal symmetry, lateral lip symmetry, vermilion contour, and white roll continuity. The individual scores for each factor were combined to yield an overall rating of poor, fair, good, and excellent.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Unilater cleft lip.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cleft Lip, Unilateral

Clinical Trials on Millard and Tension Randal Technique

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings