Efficacy and Safety of Tranilast Combined With Minocycline in the Treatment of Rosacea

March 8, 2024 updated by: Weihui Zeng, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a complex pathogenesis involving multiple factors. Currently, the treatment of rosacea remains highly challenging. Mast cells, as key participants in the pathogenesis of rosacea, have been shown to alleviate rosacea symptoms with some topical, oral, and injectable mast cell stabilizers in recent years. Tranilast stabilizes mast cells and basophils by acting on their cell membranes and preventing their degranulation. Tranilast has been used in the treatment of various skin disease, such as hypertrophic scars and atopic dermatitis. Minocycline is a first-line treatment for rosacea, and low-dose minocycline treatment (50mg/day) is believed to have anti-inflammatory effects without antibacterial effects, thus minimizing the dysbiosis and bacterial resistance caused by antibiotic use. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of combining mast cell stabilizer tranilast with low-dose minocycline treatment for rosacea, providing new treatment options and insights for rosacea patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a complex pathogenesis involving multiple factors. Currently, the treatment of rosacea remains highly challenging. In the skin, mast cells are located in the dermis near nerve endings and blood vessels, playing a crucial role in inflammatory responses. Mast cells, as key participants in the pathogenesis of rosacea, have been shown to alleviate rosacea symptoms with some topical, oral, and injectable mast cell stabilizers in recent years. Tranilast stabilizes mast cells and basophils by acting on their cell membranes and preventing their degranulation. Tranilast has been used in the treatment of various skin disease, such as hypertrophic scars and atopic dermatitis. Minocycline is a first-line treatment for rosacea, and low-dose minocycline treatment (50mg/day) is believed to have anti-inflammatory effects without antibacterial effects, thus minimizing the dysbiosis and bacterial resistance caused by antibiotic use. However, there is currently a lack of clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of combined treatment with tranilast and minocycline for rosacea. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of combining mast cell stabilizer tranilast with low-dose minocycline treatment for rosacea, providing new treatment options and insights for rosacea patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
45

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710000
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong Universi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males and nonpregnant females, aged 18-60 years old;
  2. Diagnosed with erythematotelangiectatic or papulopustular rosacea, with an investigator' s global assessment of 3-5;
  3. Patients with good cognitive function and normal mental status;
  4. Patients with good communication skills;
  5. Voluntary participation in the study and signing of informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Allergy to any component of tranilast capsules;
  2. Allergy to any component of minocycline capsules;
  3. History of systemic medication for rosacea treatment within the past month;
  4. Pregnancy or lactation;
  5. Presence of severe primary diseases in addition to rosacea, such as cardiovascular system, cerebrovascular system, digestive system, urinary system, hematopoietic system diseases, or systemic failure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: minocycline treatment group
The patient was treated with oral minocycline capsules, 50mg each time, once a day, for 12 weeks.
Drug: minocycline
The patient was treated with oral minocycline, 50mg each time, once a day, for 12 weeks.
Experimental: tranilast treatment group
The patient was treated with oral tranilast capsules, 0.1g each time, three times a day, for 12 weeks.
Drug: tranilast
The patient was treated with oral tranilast, 0.1g each time, three times a day, for 12 weeks.
Experimental: tranilast combined with minocycline treatment group
The patient was treated with oral tranilast capsules, 0.1g each time, three times a day; oral minocycline capsules, 50mg each time, once a day, for 12 weeks.
Drug: minocycline
The patient was treated with oral minocycline, 50mg each time, once a day, for 12 weeks.
Drug: tranilast
The patient was treated with oral tranilast, 0.1g each time, three times a day, for 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
lesion counts
Time Frame: From enrollment to week 12
The counts of skin lesions, including papules, pustules, and papulopustules, was used to evaluate the changes of facial inflammatory skin lesions before and after treatment.
From enrollment to week 12
Clinician's Erythema Assessment score
Time Frame: From enrollment to week 12
The name of the scale is Clinician's Erythema Assessment. It was used to evaluate the change of persistent facial erythema before and after treatment. The score on the Clinician's Erythema Assessment scale ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating more severe persistent erythema on the patient's face.
From enrollment to week 12
Global Flushing Severity Scale score
Time Frame: From enrollment to week 12
The name of the scale is Global Flushing Severity Scale. It was used to evaluate the change of facial flushing symptoms before and after treatment. The score on the Global Flushing Severity Scale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of facial flushing.
From enrollment to week 12
Global Acne Grading System score
Time Frame: From enrollment to week 12
The name of the scale is Global Acne Grading System. It was used to evaluate the changes of facial inflammatory skin lesions before and after treatment. The Global Acne Grading System score ranges from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating more inflammatory lesions on the patient's face.
From enrollment to week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction evaluation
Time Frame: week 12
Patient satisfaction was evaluated as very satisfied, satisfied, relatively satisfied and dissatisfied.
week 12
melanin index
Time Frame: From enrollment to week 12
Use non-invasive skin analyzer to measure the melanin index on the patient's facial skin at each follow-up visit.
From enrollment to week 12
erythema index
Time Frame: From enrollment to week 12
Use non-invasive skin analyzer to measure the erythema index on the patient's facial skin at each follow-up visit.
From enrollment to week 12
transepidermal water loss
Time Frame: From enrollment to week 12
Use non-invasive skin analyzer to measure the transepidermal water loss on the patient's facial skin at each follow-up visit.
From enrollment to week 12
Dermatology Life Quality Index score
Time Frame: week 0 and12
The name of the scale is Dermatology Life Quality Index. It was used to assess the changes in quality of life before and after treatment. The Dermatology Life Quality Index score ranges from 0 to 29, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of the disease on the patient's quality of life.
week 0 and12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Weihui Zeng, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 8, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20240301-2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rosacea

Clinical Trials on minocycline

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings