Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tender Point Infiltration (TPI) for Acute and Subacute Zoster Associated Pain

August 29, 2025 updated by: Fang Luo, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tender Point Infiltration (TPI) for Management of Acute and Subacute Zoster Associated Pain

Herpes zoster (HZ) is a skin infection disease which cause severe zoster-associated pain (ZAP) along sensory nerve in the corresponding segment. Evidence for the efficacy of existing local therapies for acute/subacute ZAP is limited. The hypothesis is that patients with acute/subacute ZAP treated with TPIs with local anesthetic and steroids under the basis of standard treatment will show better clinical outcomes compared with subjects treated with standard antiviral medicine treatment only.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The conventional therapies for HZ infection can be seen in two phases. Those in acute phase are mainly antiviral (acyclovir, famciclovir, etc.), analgesic drugs (opioids, acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, gabapentin, etc.), while these conventional drug therapies could yield potential side effects, and part of patients are not fully satisfied with the analgesic effect. It is considered that supplementary and alternative local therapies may have better results with less side effects and reduce medical costs to relieve pain associated with HZ infection. These options, including nerve blockade (epidural injection, paravertebral injection, sympathetic block, intercostal nerve block, intracutaneous injection), pulsed radiofrequency16, acupuncture, fire needling acupuncture, electrical nerve stimulation19, lidocaine patch, capsaicin cream, and botulinum toxin injection have been reported to give positive therapeutic effects on acute herpes zoster neuralgia (AHN), however, evidence for the efficacy of existing local therapies is limited and risks may occur due to high invasiveness of some procedures, there is insufficient evidence and expert agreement to make recommendations for these intervention strategies as first-line treatments in guidelines.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
136

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100070
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with onset of HZ rash less than 90 days.
  2. HZ affected the spinal nerves (cervical/thoracic/lumbar nerve).
  3. Aged 18 to 75 years (inclusive).
  4. Pain intensity > 7 cm on a visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10 cm).
  5. Agreed to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Infection at the puncture site.
  2. Poor general situation unable to be treated.
  3. A history of abuse of narcotics.
  4. Non-compliance or inability to complete the self-evaluation questionnaires.
  5. Pregnancy or lactation.
  6. Patients using immunosuppressants and those with severe systemic diseases such as hematological malignancies, cancers, or autoimmune disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Standard gorup
Patients will receive standard oral medicine for herpes zoster.
Drug: analgesic
Patients will receive daily 300 mg pregabalin in divided doses (150 mg/12 hours). Once the patient report mild pain (VAS ≤ 3), the trial for reducing the pregabalin dose will be done. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug celecoxib (200 mg on request, up to two times daily)27 and tramadol (100 mg on request, up to 400mg daily) will be available for as-needed analgesia.
Other Names:
  • Standard treatment
Experimental: TPI group
Patients will receive standard medicine treatment and tender point infiltrations therapy.
Drug: analgesic
Patients will receive daily 300 mg pregabalin in divided doses (150 mg/12 hours). Once the patient report mild pain (VAS ≤ 3), the trial for reducing the pregabalin dose will be done. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug celecoxib (200 mg on request, up to two times daily)27 and tramadol (100 mg on request, up to 400mg daily) will be available for as-needed analgesia.
Other Names:
  • Standard treatment
Behavioral: Tender point infiltration
Lidocaine mixed with diprospan injected into tender points.
Other Names:
  • TPI infiltration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The presence of postherpetic neuralgia using VAS score
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months after the treatments, number of patients with any pain with a VAS score of higher than 0/Number of all patients，0="no pain" and 10="worst pain imaginable"
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
visual analogue scale score at each time point
Time Frame: before the treatment (baseline), 30min after the intervention (for TPI group), then 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following the treatment
0 = 'no pain at all' to 10 = 'worst pain imaginable'
before the treatment (baseline), 30min after the intervention (for TPI group), then 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following the treatment
Proportion of patients receiving repeated TPIs and block points
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of patients receiving TPI treatments more than twice/Number of all patients
12 months
Consumption of oral drugs at each time point
Time Frame: day 1, then 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following the treatment.
Dose of celecoxib, pregabalin and tramadol
day 1, then 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following the treatment.
Patient satisfaction scores on the 5-point Likert scale
Time Frame: day 1, then week 2, month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 12 following the treatment
1: Very dissatisfied,2: Dissatisfied,3: Not sure,4: Satisfied,5: Very satisfied
day 1, then week 2, month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 12 following the treatment
Quality of life on the Scores on the WHOQOL-BREF
Time Frame: day 1, then week 2, month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 12 following the treatment
Scores on the WHOQOL-BREF. The responses are given on 5-point Likert scale (1-5) and the overall score ranges from 0 to 100; a higher score corresponds to better QoL.
day 1, then week 2, month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 12 following the treatment
Adverse reactions through study completion
Time Frame: After treatments
Any side effect and uncomfortable situation related to treatment through study completion，an average of 1 year
After treatments
The presence of PHN at month 3 and month 6 post treatment
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months after treatments
Number of patients with any pain with a VAS score of higher than 0/Number of all patients (0 = 'no pain at all' to 10 = 'worst pain imaginable')
3 and 6 months after treatments
Predictive factors for the prevention of PHN at month 12 posttreatment
Time Frame: month 12 posttreatment
the correlation between patients' baseline characteristics and the incidence of PHN will be analyzed 12 months after treatment in TPI group.
month 12 posttreatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Fang Luo, M.D., Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KY2024-045-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures and appendices) are available. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author Fang Luo on request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings