Adia MED of Winter Park LLC Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Study

June 16, 2026 updated by: Adia Med of Winter Park LLC
This 24-month study is testing whether adding AdiaVita, an umbilical cord blood-derived stem cell and exosome product, to glutathione therapy helps improve autism symptoms in children ages 3-12 more than glutathione alone. Children will be randomly placed into one of two groups for the first three months: one group receives glutathione only, and the other receives glutathione plus monthly intravenous AdiaVita infusions. Both groups also use topical glutathione cream twice daily at home. Autism symptoms will be tracked over two years using the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) filled out by parents and by therapists or teachers. Safety, side effects, quality of life, and overall well-being will be closely monitored through regular clinic visits, physical exams, blood tests, and adverse event reporting. After the initial three-month phase, children who received glutathione alone may cross over to receive AdiaVita infusions at no additional cost if safety checks at month 6 are satisfactory. Approximately 100 children with a confirmed autism diagnosis from the Central Florida area will take part. Participation is completely voluntary, and families may withdraw at any time.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study evaluates the safety and preliminary effectiveness of AdiaVita, an umbilical cord blood-derived stem cell and exosome product, when combined with glutathione for improving symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder in children ages 3-12. Participants are randomized to receive either glutathione alone or glutathione plus AdiaVita during the initial three-month treatment phase. Symptoms are measured using repeated Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist assessments completed by both parents and therapists/teachers throughout the 24-month follow-up period. The primary outcome is change in total ATEC scores at Month 6, with secondary outcomes including safety, tolerability, quality of life, and overall wellness. Children in the glutathione-only group may enter a Phase II extension in which they later receive stem cell infusions at no additional cost if safety requirements are met at the six-month interim review. All clinical visits include physical exams, vitals, adverse event reviews, and post-infusion monitoring. Treatments involve monthly intravenous administration and twice-daily at-home topical glutathione during Phase One. Blood tests are completed prior to key visits to ensure medical stability, and serious adverse events trigger immediate medical attention and reporting. Risks include infusion-related discomfort, headache, fever, allergic reactions, or rare immune responses, with theoretical long-term risks noted. Potential benefits include improvement in social interaction, communication, and behavioral symptoms, although no benefits are guaranteed. Participation is voluntary and families may withdraw at any time, though study costs already paid are non-refundable. Data are stored securely with coded identifiers and only authorized parties may access identifiable information. Recruitment occurs through direct contact, clinic advertising, community outreach, and social media. Approximately 100 children Nation Wide are expected to participate and must have a confirmed ASD diagnosis prior to enrollment. Exclusion criteria include severe allergies to the study products, uncontrolled medical conditions, and recent participation in another interventional trial. No monetary incentives are offered, and families instead pay a fixed fee of $12,000 for Phase One, which covers all procedures and also includes Phase II if applicable. Outcomes will contribute to scientific knowledge regarding the safety and possible clinical utility of stem cell-based therapies for ASD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Winter Park, Florida, United States, 32789
        • Recruiting
        • Adia Med Of Winter Park
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 3-12 years
  • Confirmed ASD diagnosis (DSM-5 criteria, supported by ADOS-2)
  • Parent/guardian willingness to consider experimental treatments and comply with study requirements
  • Ability to attend all scheduled visits
  • Able to meet study cost requirements ($12,000 study fee plus bloodwork costs, if applicable) as described in the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe allergies to study products
  • Significant uncontrolled medical conditions
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding (if applicable)
  • Participation in another interventional trial within 30 days
  • Prior stem cell or glutathione therapy: History of stem cell therapy (including umbilical cord blood-derived stem cells or exosomes) or glutathione therapy (intravenous or topical) at any time prior to screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Glutathione with Stem Cells
Biological: Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Stem Cells and Exosomes
Intravenous infusion of cryopreserved allogeneic umbilical cord blood-derived product containing viable mononuclear cells (including hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem/stromal cells) and exosomes.
Drug: Glutathione
Reduced L-glutathione administered Intravenous infusion once monthly for 3 months (Phase I)
Active Comparator: Glutathione Only
Drug: Glutathione
Reduced L-glutathione administered Intravenous infusion once monthly for 3 months (Phase I)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Total Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) Score at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
The Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) is a caregiver-completed questionnaire designed to evaluate treatment effectiveness in autism by assessing symptoms across four domains (Speech/Language/Communication, Sociability, Sensory/Cognitive Awareness, and Health/Physical/Behavior). Total ATEC scores range from 0 to 180, with higher scores indicating greater severity of autism symptoms (worse outcome) and lower scores indicating fewer symptoms (better outcome).
Baseline and Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline through Month 24
Baseline through Month 24
Change from Baseline in Total Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) Score at Month 3
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3
The Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) is a caregiver-completed questionnaire designed to evaluate treatment effectiveness in autism by assessing symptoms across four domains (Speech/Language/Communication, Sociability, Sensory/Cognitive Awareness, and Health/Physical/Behavior). Total ATEC scores range from 0 to 180, with higher scores indicating greater severity of autism symptoms (worse outcome) and lower scores indicating fewer symptoms (better outcome).
Baseline and Month 3
Change from Baseline in Total Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) Score at Months 12 and 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12, and Month 24
The Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) is a caregiver-completed questionnaire designed to evaluate treatment effectiveness in autism by assessing symptoms across four domains (Speech/Language/Communication, Sociability, Sensory/Cognitive Awareness, and Health/Physical/Behavior). Total ATEC scores range from 0 to 180, with higher scores indicating greater severity of autism symptoms (worse outcome) and lower scores indicating fewer symptoms (better outcome).
Baseline, Month 12, and Month 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Adia Med of Winter Park LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 15, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 15, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 12, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 26, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Adia Med ASD Research Study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Stem Cells and Exosomes

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings