Hope for the Chronically Suicidal Patient

December 11, 2012 updated by: Shelley McMain, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Hope for the Chronically Suicidal Patient: Evaluating the Clinical and Health Services Impact of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy in Individuals With Borderline Personality Disorder

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for chronically suicidal behavior in individuals diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Recent investigations of DBT have yielded positive results and have challenged the widely held opinion that the prognosis for this condition is poor. This study will consist of a two-arm randomized controlled trial that will compare DBT with a General Psychiatric Management (GPM) condition consisting of a structured algorithmic medication intervention plus psychosocial counseling. One-hundred and eighty participants will be randomly assigned to either DBT or to the GPM condition. Clinical outcomes will be assessed by changes in: (1) parasuicidal behaviour; (2) treatment retention; (3) psychiatric symptomatology; (4) anger expression; (5) social functioning and (6) health status. Cost outcomes will include an analysis of health service utilization. Clinical and cost evaluations will occur at 4-month intervals over the course of the one-year treatment and over a two-year follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Suicide, a major cause of death worldwide, is a serious public health problem. Forty percent of individuals who commit suicide meet diagnostic criteria for a personality disorder and an even higher percent of those attempting suicide have a personality disorder . Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is highly associated with parasuicidal behaviour. Parasuicidal behaviour refers to suicide attempts or other self-injurious behaviour and is a risk factor for completed suicide. Approximately 69% - 80% of people diagnosed with BPD have committed at least one act of self-harm. Estimates of completed suicides in this population are about 9%, with this rate quadrupling for patients who meet 8 or more of the 9 DSM criteria for BPD.

Chronically suicidal behaviour in people with BPD is estimated to be among the most expensive psychiatric disorders to treat. While there is an extensive anecdotal literature on the treatment of this population, clinical outcomes have been dismal and treatment evidence based on well-designed trials is sparse. Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), a broad-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), has recently shown promise in the treatment of this population. DBT is being widely adopted in the treatment of this disorder despite its limited empirical base. To date, there are few studies on DBT and no replications of the original research on DBT by researchers independent of the treatment developer.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of DBT for the treatment of parasuicidal individuals with BPD compared to a General Psychiatric Management (GPM) control condition involving a structured algorithm medication intervention plus psychosocial support. This study will compare the following outcome measures in participants who receive Dialectical Behavior Therapy versus General Psychiatric Management, Best Practices during a one-year treatment interval and two-year follow-up: (1) frequency and severity of parasuicidal behaviours ; (2) number of self-harm episodes (3) improvement in quality of life (4) cost effectiveness.

Hypotheses:(1) Patients in the DBT condition will show greater reductions in the frequency and severity of parasuicidal behaviours compared to patients in the GPM condition during a one-year treatment interval and two-year follow-up; (2) Compared to GPM, DBT will result in a greater reduction in the number of self-harm episodes and a greater improvement in quality of life but will have a higher direct cost. However, because DBT will result in significant offsetting reductions in other health service costs, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will fall within the range of many accepted medical interventions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 1W8
        • St Michael's Hospital
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2S1
        • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 58 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet DSM-IV criteria for BPD
  • Between 18-60 years of age
  • Have had two parasuicide episodes in the past five years with one occurring in the past 3 months
  • Have had OHIP coverage for 1 year or more
  • Literate in English
  • Provide informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current active substance dependence disorder
  • Psychotic disorder,bipolar I disorder, or dementia
  • Evidence of an organic brain syndrome or mental retardation
  • A chronic or serious physical health problem that will require hospitalization within the next year (e.g. cancer)
  • A medical condition that would preclude the psychiatric medication regimen in the GPM condition
  • Definite plans to leave the province in the next 2 years
  • Currently engaged in DBT or GPM at St. Michael's Hospital

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A
General Psychiatric Management
General Psychiatric Management (GPM) condition consisting of a structured algorithmic medication intervention plus psychosocial counseling.
Experimental: 2
Dialectal Behaviour Therapy
Modification of behaviours achieved with reframing thoughts and impulses

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Parasuicidal behaviour
Time Frame: intermittent
intermittent

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Psychiatric hospitalization
Time Frame: intermittent
intermittent
Psychiatric symptoms
Time Frame: intermittent
intermittent
Treatment retention
Time Frame: intermittent
intermittent

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shelley F. McMain, PhD, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2012

Last Verified

December 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Borderline Personality Disorder

Clinical Trials on General Psychiatric Management

3
Subscribe