Sacral Nerve Stimulation Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Fecal Incontinence

January 17, 2013 updated by: MedtronicNeuro

Medtronic InterStim® Sacral Nerve Stimulation Therapy for Bowel Control: Fecal Incontinence Study

Fecal incontinence (FI) is a difficulty in storing gas, liquid stool or solid stool (bowel movement) in order to expel it at a proper time and place. Patients who suffer from FI may experience passive FI (difficulty in sensing stool in the rectum) or urgency (able to sense a bowel movement but cannot hold the stool until an acceptable time and place). FI is not a life-threatening disease, but it is often profoundly distressing and socially incapacitating.

If a patient is suffering with symptoms of chronic FI despite trying oral medications, biofeedback and/or other more conservative treatments, a patient may be eligible to participate in a clinical research study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic fecal incontinence. One hundred-twenty (120) patients will be implanted with medical devices and followed closely for twelve months, and then once a year after that until the study closes. There are up to 20 centers in the United States.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

285

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Fleurimont, Quebec, Canada
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information
      • San Francisco, California, United States
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information
    • Florida
      • Weston, Florida, United States
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information
    • Massachusetts
      • Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information
    • Texas
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States
        • Contact Medtronic for specific site information

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed and dated informed consent.
  • 18 years of age or older.
  • Patient is diagnosed with chronic fecal incontinence of a duration greater than 6 months (>12 months post-vaginal childbirth) and defined as > 2 incontinent episodes on average per week of more than staining recorded during the baseline diary period.
  • Failed or are not candidates for more conservative treatments.
  • Willing and competent to completely and accurately fill out bowel diaries and questionnaires throughout the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Congenital anorectal malformations.
  • Active participation in another bowel disorder investigational study.
  • Present rectal prolapse.
  • Previous rectal surgery (such as rectopexy or resection) or sphincteroplasty done < 12 months prior to study enrollment (24 months for cancer).
  • Neurological diseases such as clinically significant peripheral neuropathy or complete spinal cord injury (i.e. paraplegia).
  • Grade III hemorrhoids.
  • Known or suspected organic disorders of the bowel (i.e. Inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn's or ulcerative colitis).
  • Chronic watery diarrhea, unmanageable by drugs or diet, as primary cause of fecal incontinence. (Incontinent episodes with a Bristol stool consistency of > 6 for > 4 days during the baseline diary period will be exclusionary, unless the investigator determines that the diary is not indicative of chronic watery diarrhea.)
  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy.
  • Patients for whom patient materials are not available in a language understood by the patient.
  • Life expectancy of less than one year.
  • Patient characteristics indicating a poor understanding of the study or poor compliance with the study protocol (i.e., patients unable to adequately operate equipment, patients unwilling or unable to return for scheduled follow-up visits).
  • Patients with a history of pelvic irradiation who present with visible or functional effects of irradiation.
  • Patients with active anal abscesses or fistulas.
  • Patients with anatomical limitations that would prevent the successful placement of an electrode.
  • Patients with knowledge of planned MRIs, diathermy, microwave, or RF energy.
  • Patients with other implantable neurostimulators, pacemakers or defibrillators.
  • Defect of external anal sphincter of >60 degrees or amenable to surgical repair.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects With at Least 50% Reduction in Number of Incontinent Episodes Per Week
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months

The primary efficacy objective was to demonstrate that at least 50% of subjects will achieve at least 50% reduction in the number of fecal incontinent episodes per week at 12 months post-implant compared to baseline. Subjects who achieve at least 50% reduction in the number of fecal incontinent episodes per week at 12 months post-implant compared to baseline are considered "successes."

The observed therapeutic success rate is calculated as the proportion of implanted subjects who achieve at least 50% reduction in the number of incontinent episodes per week from baseline to twelve months.

Baseline and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects With at Least 50% Reduction in Number of Incontinent Days Per Week
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months

This secondary objective was to demonstrate that at least 50% of subjects achieved at least 50% reduction in the number of incontinent days per week at 12 months post-implant compared to baseline. Subjects who achieve at least 50% reduction in the number of fecal incontinent days per week at 12 months post-implant compared to baseline are considered "successes."

The observed therapeutic success rate is calculated as the proportion of implanted subjects who achieve at least 50% reduction in the number of incontinent days per week from baseline to twelve months.

Baseline and 12 months
Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months: Scale 1 - Lifestyle
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
This secondary efficacy objective was to demonstrate improvement in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQOL) scores at 12 months post-implant compared to baseline. Scales range from 1 to 5, with a 1 indicating a lower functional status of quality of life. The four component scales of the FIQOL instrument were evaluated separately.
Baseline and 12 months
Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months: Scale 2 - Coping/Behavior
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 Months
This secondary efficacy objective was to demonstrate improvement in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQOL) scores at 12 months post-implant compared to baseline. Scales range from 1 to 5, with a 1 indicating a lower functional status of quality of life. The four component scales of the FIQOL instrument were evaluated separately.
Baseline and 12 Months
Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months: Scale 3 - Depression/Self-Perception
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 Months
This secondary efficacy objective was to demonstrate improvement in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQOL) scores at 12 months post-implant compared to baseline. Scales range from 1 to 5, with a 1 indicating a lower functional status of quality of life. The four component scales of the FIQOL instrument were evaluated separately.
Baseline and 12 Months
Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months: Scale 4 - Embarrassment
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 Months
This secondary efficacy objective was to demonstrate improvement in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQOL) scores at 12 months post-implant compared to baseline. Scales range from 1 to 5, with a 1 indicating a lower functional status of quality of life. The four component scales of the FIQOL instrument were evaluated separately.
Baseline and 12 Months
Proportion of Subjects With at Least 50% Reduction in Number of Urgent Incontinent Episodes Per Week
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months

This secondary objective was to demonstrate that at least 50% of subjects achieved at least 50% reduction in the number of urgent incontinent episodes per week at 12 months post-implant compared to baseline. Subjects who achieve at least 50% reduction in the number of urgent fecal incontinent episodes per week at 12 months post-implant compared to baseline are considered "successes."

The observed therapeutic success rate is calculated as the proportion of implanted subjects who achieve at least 50% reduction in the number of urgent incontinent episodes per week from baseline to 12 months.

Baseline and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sudha Iyer, PhD, Medtronic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2002

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2007

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2005

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 20, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 24, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fecal Incontinence

Clinical Trials on InterStim Sacral Nerve Stimulation Therapy

Subscribe