Enhancing Outcomes After Colon Surgery

Enhancing Outcomes After Colon Surgery: Role of Prehabilitation Facilitating the Recovery Process.

Most patients find that recovering from surgery is difficult particularly after abdominal surgery for cancer or other intestinal disorders. The surgical stress, healing process and concerns if further treatments are required suggest that the post-operative period may not be the best time to get people to exercise to rehabilitate lost functions. Prehabilitation is the process of enhancing functional capacity of the individual to enable him or her to withstand an incoming stressor, such as surgery, and this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of prehabilitation for colorectal surgery. Two groups will be formed by a random process and the prehabilitation group will use an exercise cycle and weights to build endurance and strength for a 3-week period prior to surgery. The other group will receive training about exercises that will help them move better after surgery. People who are malnourished prior to surgery will receive nutritional supplements. The results of this trial will be used to inform practitioners and patients alike of the benefits (or risks if any) of exercise in preparing for surgery.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Colorectal Surgery
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Prehabilitation

Detailed Description

The surgical process is a major stressor because of the psychological distress, tissue trauma, lack of activity, and quasi-starvation and it produces immediate systemic changes and both short- and long-term effects on activity and quality of life. However, there is mounting evidence that many of the negative immediate effects of surgery such as pain, fatigue, and weakness are amenable to intervention. If proper interventions are carried out, these symptoms may be readily controlled allowing for a faster recovery and early home discharge. But the effects of surgery are felt far beyond the immediate convalescent period and patients can feel fatigued for many weeks and this delays return to usual function and reduces quality of life. Thus, it would be of great practical benefit if ways of improving post-surgery physical function and quality of life could be identified.

Traditionally efforts have been made to improve the recovery process by intervening in the post-operative period. However, the post-operative period may not be the most opportune time to introduce interventions to accelerate recovery. Many of these surgical patients are concerned about perturbing the healing process as well as being depressed and anxious if they await further treatment. The pre-operative period may be a more emotionally salient time to intervene in the factors that contribute to recovery. The process of enhancing functional capacity of the individual to enable him or her to withstand an incoming stressor has been termed prehabilitation The purpose of this study is to address the following research question: Among persons scheduled for colorectal surgery, does a pre-operative program of aerobic and muscle strength training (prehabilitation) compared to a standard peri-operative educational protocol affect functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life? The trial will be a single blind, stratified (on cancer diagnosis or not), randomized, two-group (prehabilitation or standard care), parallel design. Both groups will receive the same peri-operative education program. In conformity with current practice, all subjects will also be advised on nutritional support during the preoperative period. Persons with albumin < 38 gm./l will receive an adequate supply of protein and calorie nutritional supplement bars. In addition to this standard care, the prehabilitation group will be prescribed a program of exercise training consisting of daily stationary cycling from the start of the intervention to the day prior to surgery (minimum 3 weeks) combined with an individualized program of muscle strength training.

Both groups will be evaluated for exercise tolerance, walking capacity and health and emotional status at enrolment and after 3 three weeks of training as well as at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (6 months) post-surgery. The main outcome measure will be the 6 Minute Walk Test - a valid and reliable measure of functional walking capacity. The estimator of effect will be the proportion of people in each group who, at 8 weeks post-surgery, achieve or exceed their baseline value on this test (± 20m). The proposed sample size is 200. This is based on 80% power to detect a difference of 22% in the proportion recovering to baseline values (40% in standard and 62% in prehabilitation). The results of this trial will be used to inform practitioners and patients alike of the benefits (or risks if any) of exercise in preparing for surgery.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 200
• Phase: Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Canada
  • Quebec
    • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1A4
      • Montreal General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 18 and above
• Referred electively for colorectal resection for benign (polyposis adenoma diverticulitis) or non-disseminated colon and rectum cancers
• Referred electively for colorectal resection for colon reconstruction for non-active inflammatory bowel disease
• Referred electively for colorectal resection for fibrostenotic conditions that are a feature of Crohn's disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

• People with American Society of Anesthesiologists health status class 4-5
• Co-morbid medical conditions interfering with the ability to participate in either group or complete the testing procedures (e.g. dementia, disabling orthopedic and neuromuscular disease, psychosis)
• Patients at high risk for a cardiac complication during exercise at home: severe aortic stenosis, cardiac failure Class IV NYHA, myocardial infarction within 6 months, congestive heart failure, and unstable angina
• Persons with sepsis; and treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy during six months prior to the date of surgery
• Those with very low exercise tolerance (<3.5 METS) as determined by the baseline exercise test
• Anyone with a cardiac arrhythmia that manifests during the baseline exercise testing, prior to randomization
• Those people who are already in excellent physical condition owing to a regular participation in a high intensity physical activity. On testing, persons whose age-predicted value on the 6MWT exceeds 130% will be excluded (expected <10%)

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Prevention
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
6 Minute Walk Test	baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
V02 max and submax	baseline, 24 weeks
SF-36 - Short form 36	baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks
CHAMPS - Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors	baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale - HADS	baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks
Fatigue and Pain VAS	baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks
Visual Analogue Mood States (VAMS)	baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks
2Minute Walk Test	baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks
Complications: infection (wound, sepsis, urinary, lung); bleeding; wound dehiscence; technical complications (ileus, anastomotic leakage); stroke, MI, DVT/PE, delirium, fall w/wo injury; malnutrition; urinary retention; respiratory failure	baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks
Charges for bed day: surgical procedure; surgeon/anaesthesiologist; pre, post and follow-up tests and procedures; visits; follow-up medications	baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: McGill University
• Collaborators: Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Carli F, Mayo N. Measuring the outcome of surgical procedures: what are the challenges? Br J Anaesth. 2001 Oct;87(4):531-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/87.4.531. No abstract available.
• Carli F. Perioperative factors influencing surgical morbidity: what the anesthesiologist needs to know. Can J Anaesth. 1999 May;46(5 Pt 2):R70-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03013183. No abstract available. English, French.
• Carli F, Mayo N, Klubien K, Schricker T, Trudel J, Belliveau P. Epidural analgesia enhances functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life after colonic surgery: results of a randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2002 Sep;97(3):540-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200209000-00005.
• Mayo NE, Feldman L, Scott S, Zavorsky G, Kim DJ, Charlebois P, Stein B, Carli F. Impact of preoperative change in physical function on postoperative recovery: argument supporting prehabilitation for colorectal surgery. Surgery. 2011 Sep;150(3):505-14. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.045.
• Carli F, Charlebois P, Stein B, Feldman L, Zavorsky G, Kim DJ, Scott S, Mayo NE. Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1187-97. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7102.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: February 1, 2005
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 1, 2008
• Study Completion (Actual): December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 27, 2005
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 27, 2005
• First Posted (Estimate): September 28, 2005

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): September 6, 2010
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 2, 2010
• Last Verified: September 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Exercise; Surgery; Prehabilitation; Colon
• Other Study ID Numbers: REC02-053