A Study to Compare Meloxicam IM Once Daily and Meloxicam Administered Orally Once Daily in Patients With Osteoarthritis

October 31, 2013 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

A Randomised, Open-labelled Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Meloxicam 7.5 mg IM Ampoules Once Daily and Meloxicam 7.5 mg Tablets Administered Orally Once Daily Over a Period of 7 Days in Patients With Osteoarthritis (OA)

The objective of this trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of 7.5 mg meloxicam i.m. once daily compared with 7.5 mg meloxicam tablets once daily p.o. in patients with osteoarthritis over a time period of 7 days.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This was a randomized (1:1), open-label, multi-center, active-control, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of 7.5 mg meloxicam i.m. once daily compared with 7.5 mg meloxicam tablets once daily p.o. in patients with osteoarthritis over a time period of 7 days.

The primary endpoint: Pain on active movement,

The secondary endpoint:

  • Pain at rest
  • Patient status with regard to change of arthritic condition assessed by the patient/investigator
  • Patient's assessment of arthritic condition
  • Onset of action
  • Time to maximum pain relief
  • Paracetamol consumption
  • Withdrawals due to inadequate efficacy
  • Final global assessment of efficacy by the patient/investigator

Safety endpoints

  • Local tolerability assessment of the injections by the patient/investigator
  • Patient's /Investigator's assessment of overall tolerability
  • Number, nature and severity of adverse events
  • Laboratory investigations
  • Withdrawals due to safety reasons

Patients eligible for the trial who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria and who gave their informed consent were randomized to one of two treatment groups (i.e. meloxicam ampoule or meloxicam tablet).

The study period totaled 8-14 days included screening, randomisation, study drug administration, and 7-day follow-up. The relevant assessment were performed on the day of randomisation and 7-day follow up.

Study Hypothesis:

The null hypothesis of interest is that the primary endpoint for meloxicam ampoule is inferior to oral meloxicam. The alternative is that meloxicam ampoule is noninferior to the oral meloxicam .

Comparison(s):

The primary endpoint of the study was to assess pain on active movement by VAS prior and after the treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

168

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100044
        • People's Hospital, Beijing University
      • Beijing, China, 100050
        • Beijing Xuan Wu Hospital
      • Hefei City, Anhui Province, China, 230022
        • 1st Affiliated, Anhui Medical University
      • Nan City, China, 250012
        • Qilu Hospital, Shang Dong University
      • Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
      • Shanghai, China, 200001
        • Shanghai Renji Hospital
      • Shanghai, China, 200052
        • Shanghai Guanghai Hospital
      • Shanghai, China, 200443
        • Shanghai Changhai Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female aged 18 years or above
  • Patients suffering from acute and painful exacerbation of osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

The diagnosis must be based on

  • clinical signs and symptoms or
  • x-ray diagnosis plus clinical signs and symptoms

    • Assessment of pain on active movement (by the patient) must exceed 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS)
    • Symptoms of OA requiring administration of NSAIDs
    • Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to the trial drugs or their excipients, analgesics, antipyretics or NSAIDs
  • Any clinical evidence of active peptic ulceration during the last six months
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding (precaution : attention should be drawn to reports that NSAIDs were reported to decrease the effectivity of intrauterine devices)
  • Asthma, nasal polyps, angioneurotic oedema or urticaria following the administration of aspirin or NSAIDs
  • Concomitant treatment with anti-coagulants (including heparin), lithium
  • Concomitant administration of other NSAIDs or analgesic agents (except paracetamol up to 4g/day)
  • Administration of any NSAID during the last 2 days (3 days for any oxicam) prior to the first administration of the trial drug
  • Concomitant treatment with an oral corticosteroid initiated or with an altered dose over the previous month
  • Parenteral or intraarticular administration of corticosteroids in the previous month
  • Any i.m. injection during the previous 7 days
  • Any contra-indication to i.m. injections
  • Clinical evidence of or known severe cardiac, hepatic, renal, metabolic, haematological disease, mental disturbance, ulcerative colitis
  • Any other rheumatological or non-rheumatological disease that could interfere with the evaluation of efficacy and safety
  • Serum creatinine 125 % of the upper limit of normal range ; aspartate transferase (AST/SGOT) and/or alkaline transferase (ALT/SGPT) 200 % of the upper limit of normal range
  • Platelet count < 100,000/mm3 ; leucocytes count < 3,000/mm3
  • Synovectomy in the previous month or during the trial
  • Participation in another clinical trial during this study or during the previous month
  • Previous participation in this trial
  • Patient unable to comply with the protocol
  • Concomitant therapy with specific symptomatic drug of OA, such as chondroitin sulphate, diacerhein, initiated or with an altered dose over the previous 3 months.
  • Intraarticular administration of hyaluronic acid in the previous month
  • Patients where physiotherapy will be changed throughout the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain on active movement by VAS.
Time Frame: day 0, day 7
day 0, day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain at rest
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days
Patient status with regard to change of arthritic condition
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days
Withdrawals due to inadequate efficacy
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days
Onset of Analgesic action
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days
Time to maximum pain relief
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days
Paracetamol consumption
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days
Final global assessment of efficacy by patient
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days
Final global assessment of efficacy by investigator
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days
Assessment of local tolerability
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days
Nature and severity of adverse events
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days
Change in other laboratory investigations
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days
Withdrawals due to safety reasons
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days
Patient's and investigator's assessment of overall tolerability
Time Frame: up to 7 days
up to 7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator, Boehringer Ingelheim Shanghai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2004

Study Completion

December 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 1, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2013

Last Verified

October 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Meloxicam ampoule

3
Subscribe