Efficacy and Safety Study of Meloxicam Versus Mefenamic Acid in Patients With Dysmenorrhea

August 29, 2018 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Double Blind Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Meloxicam 7.5 mg and 15 mg Versus Mefenamic Acid 1500 mg in the Treatment of Dysmenorrhea

To access the efficacy and safety of Meloxicam 7.5 mg and 15 mg once daily compared with Mefenamic acid 500 mg t.i.d. over a treatment period of 3-5 days, during an observation period of 3 menstrual cycles, for the symptomatic relief of primary dysmenorrhea

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

337

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 38 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients between 18 to 40 years
  • Patients experiencing primary (functional) dysmenorrhea during the last 3 consecutive menstrual periods. Diagnosis will be based on symptoms and clinical signs: abdominopelvic pain, may radiate to the back and along the thighs; systemic symptoms including nausea, vomit, diarrhoea, headache, fatigue, nervousness, dizziness; the symptomatology should be usually some hours to one day before commencement of visible vaginal bleeding
  • Evaluation of lumbar and/or abdominopelvic pain due to dysmenorrhea > 35 mm through a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS)
  • Outpatients
  • Patients granting their written informed consent
  • Therapy with a NSAID (nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug) is required or recommended

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to trial drugs or their excipients, analgesics, antipyretics or NASIDs
  • Analgesic concomitant treatment (between each cycle paracetamol administration will be allowed)
  • To initiate hormonal contraception or intrauterine devices after inclusion to this trial or during the last 3 months
  • Abdominal surgery or pelvic procedure scheduled during the study
  • Patients with organic dysmenorrhea (endometriosis, salpingitis, adnexitis, uterine retroversion, tubal cysts, ovarian cysts, pathological vaginal secretion, painful pelvic exploration, etc.)
  • Patients with neoplastic disorders
  • History of recent abdominal or pelvic trauma requiring surgery
  • Peptic ulcer within the past 6 months
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Asthma, nasal polyps, angioneurotic edema or rash following aspirin or NSAIDs administration
  • Concomitant treatment with anti-coagulants, including heparin and aspirin, lithium or methotrexate
  • Concomitant administration of other NSAIDs (including aspirin > 150 mg daily) or analgesics
  • Confinement to bed rest
  • Administration of any NSAID during two days (three for oxicams) before the first administration of the trial drug
  • Present treatment or treatment within the last two months with corticosteroids
  • Impaired renal function (serum urea > 125 % of the upper limit of normal range; serum creatinine > 150 % of the upper limit of normal range)
  • Sever liver injury (alanine amino transferase ALAT > 2 x the upper normal range limit or aspartate amino transferase ASAT > 2 x the upper normal range limit)
  • Hematological disorder (platelet count < 100,000/mm**3, leucocyte count < 3,000/mm**3)
  • Participation in another clinical trial during this study or the previous month
  • Previous participation in this trial
  • Patient unable to comply with protocol
  • Bleeding disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluation of severity of lumbar and/or abdominal pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and day 3-5 of each treatment cycle
Baseline and day 3-5 of each treatment cycle

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Final global assessment of efficacy by patient on a 4-point scale
Time Frame: day 3-5 of the second treatment cycle
day 3-5 of the second treatment cycle
Final global assessment of efficacy by investigator on a 4-point scale
Time Frame: day 3-5 of the second treatment cycle
day 3-5 of the second treatment cycle
Final global assessment of tolerability by patient on a 4-point scale
Time Frame: day 3-5 of the second treatment cycle
day 3-5 of the second treatment cycle
Final global assessment of tolerability by investigator on a 4-point scale
Time Frame: day 3-5 of the second treatment cycle
day 3-5 of the second treatment cycle
Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AE)
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Incidence of significant laboratory events
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Number of perforations, ulcerations and/or bleedings (PUB) of the upper gastro-intestinal tract
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Number of gastro-intestinal adverse events (GI-AEs)
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Duration of hospitalization stay due to GI-AEs
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Number of additional visits at physician due to GI-AEs
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Duration of hospitalization due to drug related AEs
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Number of withdrawals due to AEs
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Intensity of AEs on a 3-point scale
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Up to 4 weeks after last treatment cycle
Evaluation of labor and/or daily life disability associated with dysmenorrhea on a VAS
Time Frame: Baseline and day 3-5 of each treatment cycle
Baseline and day 3-5 of each treatment cycle
Change in severity of symptomatology associated with dysmenorrhea
Time Frame: Baseline and day 3-5 of each treatment cycle
Baseline and day 3-5 of each treatment cycle

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 1998

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 1999

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 8, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysmenorrhea

Clinical Trials on Meloxicam 15 mg

3
Subscribe