Safety and Efficacy of the Use of Regional Anticoagulation With Citrate in Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration

August 25, 2009 updated by: Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

Safety and Efficacy of the Use of Regional Anticoagulation With Citrate in Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration, a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Anticoagulation With Citrate to the Low Molecular Weight Heparin Nadroparin

Severely ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit may develop an acute failure of kidney function. To bridge the period to recovery, renal function is temporarily replaced by continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). To prevent clotting of the hemofiltration circuit, heparin is generally used, providing anticoagulation in the circuit and the patient. As a result, bleeding complications may occur, necessitating the transfusion of blood. Anticoagulation of the circuit can also be obtained with the use of tri-sodium citrate, which provides anticoagulation of the circuit without affecting coagulation in the patient and thus without increasing his/her risk of bleeding. The use of citrate may however cause metabolic complications.

Primary aim of the present study is to show in a larger group of intensive care patients whether the use of regional anticoagulation with citrate is safe compared to systemic anticoagulation with the low molecular weight heparin nadroparin.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Severely ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit may develop an acute failure of kidney function. Renal function generally recovers if the acute illness improves. To bridge this period, renal function is temporarily replaced by continuous hemofiltration, so called continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). To remove toxic substances and fluids, the patient's blood flows through a circuit, containing a filter. Flow in the filter is regulated by the CVVH-device.

Normally blood starts to clot as soon as it leaves the body. To prevent clotting of the blood in the filter, the blood has to be 'anticoagulated'. For this purpose, heparins are generally used. Heparins make the blood less likely to clot. Drawback of the use of heparins is that they not only prevent clotting of blood in the circuit and the filter, but also in the patient. Heparins thereby increase the risk of bleeding. Intensive care patients are at higher risk of bleeding due to a recent operation or trauma, ulcers in the mouth or the stomach, or abnormalities in their blood to the acute illness. Due to the continuous application of CVVH for days, anticoagulation is administered without interruption over prolonged periods of time. Studies report bleeding complications in 5 to 50% of the patients. As a result of bleeding, patients need blood transfusion and sometimes surgery. Control of bleeding is sometimes extremely difficult.

An alternative to heparin is citrate, which allows regional anticoagulation of the circuit and the filter without an effect increasing the risk of bleeding for the patient. Anticoagulation with citrate is more complex, nurses need to follow a strict protocol.. Several small studies have shown that regional anticoagulation with citrate is associated with less bleeding and a longer filter survival. The use if citrate is however associated with a greater risk of metabolic complications, if the protocol is not strictly followed. Primary aim of the present study is to show in a larger group of intensive care patients whether the use of regional anticoagulation with citrate is safe compared to systemic anticoagulation with the low molecular weight heparin nadroparin.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

215

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1090HM
        • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Intensive care patients scheduled for continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe pre-existent liver failure (cirrhosis Child C), acute liver dysfunction as occurring with septic shock is not a reason for exclusion
  • Active bleeding or bleeding necessitating the infusion of two red blood cell units within 24 hours before starting hemofiltration or a fall in hemoglobin of > 0.5 mmol/l. A fall in hemoglobin/hematocrit as a result of fluid loading is not regarded as bleeding.
  • Surgery within 24 h prior to CVVH.
  • Patients needing full systemic anticoagulation (unfractionated heparin in a dose of > 10000 IU/day, or nadroparin > 3800 IU/day) for other reasons
  • Expectation to die within 24 hours
  • Chronic dialysis
  • Proven or suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: citrate
regional anticoagulation with citrate
for regional anticoagulation of the extracorporeal CVVH circuit
Other Names:
  • regional anticoagulation with citrate
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: nadroparin
nadroparin is a low molecular weight heparin
for anticoagulation of the extracorporeal CVVH circuit
Other Names:
  • nadroparin is a low molecular weight heparin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
bleeding complications
Time Frame: during administration of study anticoagulant
during administration of study anticoagulant
transfusion requirement
Time Frame: during administration of study anticoagulant
during administration of study anticoagulant
filter survival
Time Frame: during hemofiltration
during hemofiltration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
mortality
Time Frame: 3-month and hospital admission
3-month and hospital admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten, MD,PhD, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2003

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 3, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 26, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2009

Last Verified

August 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Failure, Acute

Clinical Trials on trisodium citrate

3
Subscribe