Intra-individual Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Metvix® Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus Conventional Metvix® Photodynamic Therapy in Subject With Mild Actinic Keratoses (CoMet)

February 16, 2021 updated by: Galderma R&D

Intra-individual Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Metvix® Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus Conventional Metvix® Photodynamic Therapy in Subject With Mild Actinic Keratoses.

The main objective of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of Metvix® natural daylight photodynamic therapy with those of Metvix® conventional photodynamic therapy with Aktilite™ lamp in subjects with mild actinic keratoses (intra-individual comparison).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Australian Capital Territory
      • Phillip, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • New South Wales
      • Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Queensland
      • Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Victoria
      • Carlton, Victoria, Australia
        • Galderma Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female above 18 years;
  2. Subject with clinical diagnosis of mild AK on the face or the scalp with or without clinical diagnosis of moderate AK on the target areas (TAs);

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject with clinical diagnosis of at least one severe AK on TAs
  2. Subject with clinical diagnosis of other skin disease (including non-melanoma skin cancer) on the TAs;
  3. Subject with pigmented AK on the TAs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Metvix and daylight
Methyl aminolevulinate, cream 160mg/g.One session at baseline and a second session administration at week 12 for lesions showing non-complete response and new lesions on target area.
Active Comparator: Metvix and lamp
Methyl aminolevulinate, cream, 160mg/g. One session at baseline and a second session administration at week 12 for lesions showing non-complete response and new lesions on target area.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lesion Response
Time Frame: Week12
Percent of lesions treated at Baseline, in complete response at Week 12
Week12
Pain Score
Time Frame: Baseline (during procedure), assessed after procedure
Subject self assessment of pain on a scale from 0 (no pain ) to 10 (extreme pain)
Baseline (during procedure), assessed after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephen Shumack, St George Dermatology and skin Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 21, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Actinic Keratoses

Clinical Trials on Metvix and natural daylight PDT

3
Subscribe