A Randomized, Multi-Center Study of the Pimecrolimus-Eluting and Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent Systems (GENESIS)

March 5, 2013 updated by: Cordis Corporation

A Randomized, Multi-Center Study of the Pimecrolimus-Eluting (Corio™) and Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System (SymBio™) in Patients With De Novo Lesions of the Native Coronary Arteries

To demonstrate non-inferiority in 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss of the pimecrolimus-eluting coronary stent (Corio) compared to the CoStar coronary stent control arm and the dual pimecrolimus/paclitaxel-eluting (Symbio) coronary stent compared to the CoStar coronary stent control arm for the treatment of single de novo lesions <25 mm in length in native coronary arteries 2.5 - 3.5 mm in diameter.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is designed to evaluate 6 month in-stent late lumen loss of the 1) Corio™ pimecrolimus-eluting coronary stent system and the 2) SymBio™ dual pimecrolimus/paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system compared to the CoStar™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System control arm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

246

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Southampton, United Kingdom, SO16 YD
        • Southampton University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

General Inclusion Criteria

  1. Eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  2. Documented stable or unstable angina pectoris
  3. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥25%
  4. Acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).
  5. Target lesion < 25 mm in length with RVD of ≥2.5 mm to ≤3.5 mm with visually estimated stenosis of ≥50% and < 100% .
  6. Target vessel had not undergone prior revascularization within the preceding 6 months.
  7. Target lesion must have been a minimum of 10 mm distance from any previously treated segment of the target vessel
  8. Patient understood the study requirements and the treatment procedures and provided written Informed Consent, approved by the local Ethics Committee.
  9. Willing to comply with all specified follow-up evaluations.

Exclusion Criteria:

General Exclusion Criteria

  1. Known sensitivity to pimecrolimus, paclitaxel, the polymer (PLGA) or cobalt chromium.
  2. Planned treatment with any other PCI device in the target vessel(s).
  3. MI within 72 hours prior to the index procedure
  4. The patient is in cardiogenic shock.
  5. Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) within the past 6 months.
  6. Acute or chronic renal dysfunction
  7. Contraindication to ASA or to clopidogrel.
  8. Thrombocytopenia
  9. Active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within the past 3 months.
  10. Any prior true anaphylactiod reaction to contrast agents
  11. Patient is currently taking colchicine, chronic systemic steroid therapy or systemic immunosuppressant therapy, or or had been treated with paclitaxel (systemic) within 12 months of the index procedure.
  12. Patient was currently, or was on long term intermittent therapy with topical pimecrolimus
  13. Female of childbearing potential.
  14. Life expectancy of less than 24 months due to other medical conditions.
  15. Co-morbid condition(s)
  16. Currently participating in another investigational drug or device study

General Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Left main coronary artery disease (stenosis >50%), whether protected or unprotected.
  2. Target lesion was ostial in location (within 3.0 mm of vessel origin).
  3. Target lesion and/or target vessel proximal to the target lesion was severely calcified by visual estimation.
  4. Target lesion involved a bifurcation with a diseased (>50% stenotic) branch vessel >2.0 mm in diameter that required intervention.
  5. Target lesion was totally occluded Thrombolysis In MI (TIMI flow 0) or TIMI flow ≤1.
  6. Angiographic presence of probable or definite thrombus.
  7. Target vessel would have been pre-treated with an unapproved device, directional or rotational coronary atherectomy, laser, cutting balloon or transluminal extraction catheter immediately prior to stent placement.
  8. Prior coronary intervention using brachytherapy to any segment of the target vessel.
  9. The target vessel had prior drug-eluting stent placement to vessel segment (or branch) proximal to intended target lesion site within preceding 6 months.
  10. Angiographic restenosis of any segment of the target vessel that had undergone prior percutaneous coronary intervention.
  11. Angiographic evidence of atherosclerotic disease with >50% diameter stenosis (by visual estimate) proximal or distal to the target lesion (applies to the major epicardial portion of the target vessel and contiguous vessel segment if the target lesion was located in a branch vessel).
  12. Prior surgical revascularization of the target vessel with patent graft (saphenous vein graft or arterial conduit).
  13. Target lesion lied within 10mm of prior surgical anastomosis site.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Corio™ Pimecrolimus-Eluting Cobalt Chromium Coronary Stent System
Drug-eluting stent
Experimental: 2
SymBio™ Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System
Drug-eluting stent
Active Comparator: Control Arm
Costar ™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System
Drug-eluting Stent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Primary angiographic late loss in the stent as measured by Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA)
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure
6 months post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MACE (composite of non-cardiac death, new Qw/nonQw MI, and TVR) as described below
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) defined as an adjudicated composite of death that cannot be clearly attributed to a non-cardiac event or non-intervention vessel, new myocardial infarction (Q-wave or non-Q-wave) that cannot be clearly attributed to a non-intervention vessel and clinically driven target vessel revascularization (TVR)
30 days and 6 months
Primary Device Success defined as attainment of <50% in-stent residual stenosis of the target lesion using only the assigned device in the absence of device malfunction and device-related complication.
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
Lesion Success defined as attainment of <50% residual stenosis of the target lesion using the assigned study device or any percutaneous method.
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
Procedure Success defined as attainment of final lesion success in the absence of in-hospital MACE.
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
Angiographic in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis (≥50% diameter stenosis).
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
In-stent and in-segment MLD
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure
6 months post-procedure
In-segment angiographic late loss
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure
6 months post-procedure
Clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure
6 months post-procedure
Percent volume obstruction of the stent by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the IVUS cohort.
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure
6 months post-procedure
Incidence of late acquired incomplete stent to vessel apposition (stent malapposition) by IVUS in the IVUS cohort.
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure
6 months post-procedure
Incidence of reported MACE
Time Frame: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure
1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure
Comparison of the pimecrolimus-eluting stent to the pimecrolimus/paclitaxel-eluting stent for primary and secondary endpoints.
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicholas Curzen, M.D., Southampton University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Stefan Verheye, M.D., AZ Middelheim Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

May 8, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2013

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Disease

Clinical Trials on Corio™ Pimecrolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System

3
Subscribe