- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00323609
KAVIAR Study - Kyphoplasty And Vertebroplasty In the Augmentation and Restoration of Vertebral Body Compression Fractures
December 6, 2017 updated by: Medtronic Spine LLC
A Multicenter, Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial to Compare the Short- and Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Balloon Kyphoplasty to Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Painful, Acute Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Body Compression Fractures (VCFs).
Patients with osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures will be randomly assigned to treatment with balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty.
Over 2 years of follow-up, back pain, back function, quality of life, adverse events, subsequent fractures and cumulative healthcare costs will be compared.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Medtronic Spine LLC is sponsoring the KAVIAR study, a randomized clinical trial comparing balloon kyphoplasty to vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures (VCFs).
Up to 1,234 subjects at up to 75 study centers with one to three VCFs and VB morphologies suitable for both balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty will be randomly assigned to receive one or the other procedure.
Study visits will occur at baseline, 30 days postoperatively, and at 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
At all visits, adverse events, back pain, back function and quality of life will be assessed.
In addition, a 7-day phone call will be conducted, which will include assessment of back pain, narcotic use and adverse events.
At baseline, pre-discharge, 3-, 12- and 24-month visits, lateral spine x-rays will be taken.
The primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients with one or more subsequent fractures at 12 and 24 months, detected radiographically as determined by a core radiology laboratory.
Secondary clinical endpoints include changes from baseline in back pain, back function and quality of life, and adverse events.
Secondary radiographic comparisons include the restoration and maintenance of VB height and angulation, and sagittal vertical axis, a measure of global sagittal balance.
A postoperative CT scan will be evaluated to detect cement extravasation and to examine the relationship between cement distribution and clinical outcomes.
Another important feature of the study is a detailed healthcare utilization data assessment.
Combined with a costing methodology based on Medicare cost data and other sources, cumulative two-year healthcare costs related to VCF will be estimated.
Combined with quality of life measurements, the cost analysis will allow a calculation of the relative cost-effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty.
Sample size is based on the primary endpoint, the proportion with subsequent fractures at 12 and 24 months.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
404
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Barrie, Ontario, Canada, L4M6MZ
- Royal Victoria Hospital
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85252
- Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd
-
-
California
-
San Jose, California, United States, 95128
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Solutions
-
Torrance, California, United States, 90505
- Torrance Memorial Medical Center
-
-
Colorado
-
Grand Junction, Colorado, United States, 81501
- Western Slope Study Group
-
-
Florida
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33637
- The Center for Spinal Disorders
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
- Radiology Associates of Atlanta
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
- Ochsner Medical Center
-
-
Michigan
-
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
- William Beaumont Hospital
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
- Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
-
-
Montana
-
Billings, Montana, United States, 59101
- Northwest Research & Educational Institute
-
-
Nevada
-
Reno, Nevada, United States, 89502
- Renown Regional Medical Center
-
-
New York
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
- University Orthopedics
-
-
Ohio
-
Franklin, Ohio, United States, 45005
- Atrium Medical Center
-
Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43606
- The Toledo Hospital
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Edmond, Oklahoma, United States, 73003
- Clinical Radiology of Oklahoma
-
-
Oregon
-
Bend, Oregon, United States, 97701
- The Center for Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Care and Research (The Center)
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Reading, Pennsylvania, United States, 19601
- Reading Hospital
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
-
Temple, Texas, United States, 76508
- Scott & White Memorial Hospital
-
-
Utah
-
Murray, Utah, United States, 84157
- Intermountain Medical Center
-
Provo, Utah, United States, 84604
- Utah Valley Regional Medical Center
-
-
Virginia
-
Roanoke, Virginia, United States, 24033
- Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital
-
-
West Virginia
-
Huntington, West Virginia, United States, 25702
- St. Mary's Hospital
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Burlington, Wisconsin, United States, 53105
- Aurora Burlington Memorial Hospital
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53215
- Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria
All subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be enrolled into the study:
- Age > 21
1 to 3 target VCFs meeting the following criteria:
- Fracture due to diagnosed or presumed underlying primary or secondary osteoporosis
- All target VCFs are between T5 and L5
- All target VCFs to be treated show either: i. Height change: An acute (< 6 month) change in VB height or morphology from a previous x-ray, CT or MRI, with height loss at the anterior, middle or posterior portion of the VB consistent with a worsening of 1 or more grades by the Genant criteria (17), OR ii. Positive MRI or bone scan: VB shows hyperintense signal on STIR sequence MRI or target VB is positive on radionuclide bone scan
- All VCFs to be treated have fracture age (time from pain onset to evaluation by the Investigator) of 6 months or less
- Back pain correlating with the location of at least one VCF
- Treatment of all target VCFs is technically feasible by and clinically appropriate for BOTH vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty. (Team approach only: Both the vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty physician have reviewed radiographic studies and agree to this prior to enrolling the subject in the study.)
- Pre-treatment back pain by numerical rating scale (NRS) score > 4 (0-10 scale)
- Pre-treatment Oswestry Disability Index >20 (0 - 100 scale)
- Subject states availability for all study visits
- Subject is able to understand the risks and benefits of participating in the study and is willing to provide written informed consent
- Subject has mental capacity to comply with the protocol requirements for 2-year duration of study
Exclusion Criteria
Subjects who meet any of the following conditions may not be enrolled into the study:
- VB morphology or configuration is such that either balloon kyphoplasty OR vertebroplasty is not technically feasible for the targeted VCFs
- Fracture due to high-energy trauma
- Suspected OR proven cancer inside index vertebral body. Note that patients with chemotherapy-related osteoporosis may be included.
- Disabling back pain due to causes other than acute fracture (e.g., sacroiliac fracture, symptomatic degenerative disc disease, lumbar spinal stenosis)
- Any painful VCF with fracture age > 6 months
- Any objective evidence of neurologic compromise at baseline
- Previous balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty for any VCF
- Spine stabilization beyond balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty required for targeted VCFs
- Significant clinical comorbidity that may potentially interfere with long-term data collection or follow-up (e.g., dementia, severe comorbid illness)
Pre-existing conditions contrary to either balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty, such as:
- Irreversible coagulopathy or bleeding disorder. Note regarding reversible coagulopathies: Subjects on coumadin or other anticoagulants may participate. Investigators should follow routine practices for perioperative discontinuation and re-initiation of anticoagulants.
- Allergy to any device materials (e.g., bone cement) for balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Note that in subjects with allergy to iodine-based contrast, other non-iodine contrast solutions may be used.
- Any evidence of VB or systemic infection
- Pregnant or child-bearing potential
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Kyphoplasty
|
Balloon Kyphoplasty involves two inflatable bone tamps placed into the vertebral body in the spine.
After the tamps are removed, the void is filled with viscous bone cement.
|
|
Active Comparator: Vertebroplasty
|
Vertebroplasty involves placement of a needle into the vertebral body.
Cement is injected into the vertebral body.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects With One or More Subsequent Radiographic Fractures at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
Percent of Subjects With One or More Subsequent Radiographic Fractures 24 Months
Time Frame: 24 months
|
24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Back Pain
Time Frame: 7 days, 30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
Back pain was assessed on a 10-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
|
7 days, 30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
|
Back Function-Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Questionnaire was used to assess patient back function.
The ODI score ranges from 0-100.
The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 100 (maximum disability).
|
30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
|
Quality of Life by SF-36
Time Frame: 30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess general health status.
The SF-36 results are summarized into two components, a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS).
The score for PCS and MCS is between 0 and 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life.
|
30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
|
Quality of Life -- EQ5D Index
Time Frame: 30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
EQ-5D index scores range from 0 to 1.0 on a scale where 0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health.
|
30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
|
Rate of Serious Adverse Events at 30 Days
Time Frame: 30 days post-operation
|
Rate of serious adverse events is presented as the percentage of the participants who reported serious adverse events within 30 days after initial treatment.
For this study, serious adverse events (SAEs) included death, serious deterioration in health, life threatening injury/illness, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, or resulted in medical or surgical intervention.
|
30 days post-operation
|
|
Rate of Procedure/Device Related or Possibly Related Serious Adverse Events at 30 Days
Time Frame: 30 days post-operation
|
Rate of Procedure/Device related or possibly related serious adverse events is presented as the percentage of the participants who reported Procedure/Device related or possibly related serious adverse events within 30 days after initial treatment.
|
30 days post-operation
|
|
Change in Anterior Vertebral Body Height
Time Frame: Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
|
|
Change in Middle Vertebral Body Height
Time Frame: Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
|
|
Change in Posterior Vertebral Body Height
Time Frame: Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
|
|
Change in Vertebral Body Kyphosis Angle
Time Frame: Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
The vertebral kyphosis angle was defined as the angle formed by lines drawn parallel to the superior and inferior endplates of the treated fractured vertebral body.
|
Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
|
Change in Vertebral Body Local Cobb Angle (LCA)
Time Frame: Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
The vertebral body local Cobb angle is a measurement of the 3-level functional unit consisting of the treated fractured vertebral body and the nearest adjacent vertebrae and is defined as the angle formed by lines drawn parallel to the superior endplate of the cranial adjacent vertebral body and the inferior endplate of the adjacent caudal vertebral body.
|
Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
|
Change in Global Sagittal Balance.
Time Frame: Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
Change in global sagittal balance as measured by sagittal vertical axis.
|
Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
|
|
VCF-related Health Care Utilization
Time Frame: Monthly for 24 months post-op
|
Health care utilization assessments conducted by monthly phone call to participating patients.
|
Monthly for 24 months post-op
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Reginald Knight, MD, Orthopedics International
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
August 1, 2006
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2011
Study Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2006
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 8, 2006
First Posted (Estimate)
May 9, 2006
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 2, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 6, 2017
Last Verified
June 1, 2012
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SP0601-KAVIAR
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Vertebral Body Compression Fractures
-
Medtronic Spine LLCCompletedVertebral Body Compression Fractures (VCFs)Germany, United States, Belgium
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesWithdrawnVertebral Body Compression Fractures
-
Lenoss MedicalMCRARecruiting
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiTerminatedVertebral Compression Fractures | Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression FracturesUnited States
-
Optimus Clinical ResearchCareFusionCompletedVertebral Compression Fractures | Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures | Acute Vertebral FracturesAustralia
-
AgNovos Healthcare, LLCActive, not recruitingVertebral Compression Fracture | Vertebral Compression | Compression FractureUnited States
-
AgNovos Healthcare, LLCActive, not recruitingVertebral Fracture | Vertebral Compression Fracture | Vertebral CompressionSpain, Germany
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalUnknownCompression Fracture of Thoracic Vertebral Body | Spinal Compression FractureTaiwan
-
Xin FanNot yet recruitingOsteoporotic Vertebral Compression FracturesChina
-
Stryker InstrumentsTalosixCompleted
Clinical Trials on Kyphoplasty
-
University of California, San FranciscoMedtronics, Inc.CompletedMultiple MyelomaUnited States
-
University Hospital, BonnUnknownOsteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures | Lung FunctionGermany
-
Centre Leon BerardTerminatedSolid Tumors | Spine MetastasisFrance
-
University of VirginiaCook Group Incorporated; ArthroCare Corporation; Cardinal HealthCompletedOsteoporotic Vertebral Compression FracturesUnited States
-
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterMedtronicRecruitingThoracic Neoplasms | Lumbar NeoplasmUnited States
-
DFINE Inc.WithdrawnMultiple Myeloma | Compression Fracture of Vertebral Column
-
Medtronic Spine LLCCompletedMultiple Myeloma | Bone Neoplasms | Osteoporosis | OsteopeniaUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicCompleted
-
Mohammad ARAB MOTLAGHCompletedVertebral Body Compression
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesWithdrawnVertebral Body Compression Fractures