A Study of Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Spine Metastases (KYPHO-01)

July 26, 2022 updated by: Centre Leon Berard

A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Bayesian-based Phase II Study of the Feasibility of Kyphoplasty in the Local Treatment of Spine Metastases From Solid Tumors

Conventional vertebroplasty is an effective option in the treatment of bone lesions (osteoporotic and neoplastic). It is indicated as an analgesic treatment and aims at reinforcing a compressed vertebrae or at risk of fracture.

The main adverse event related to vertebroplasty use is the cement leakages that might be responsible for significant clinical impairments.

Kyphoplasty is a recent alternative strategy of vertebroplasty, based on the insertion on balloon through the needle into the targeted vertebrae and then inflation of the balloon prior to cement injection into the space.

In an osteoporotic setting, kyphoplasty allow reducing the incidence of cement leakage.

To date, no data from randomized study are available in the population of cancer patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69008
        • Centre LEON BERARD
      • Saint-Étienne, France, 42270
        • Hopital Nord

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of cancer other than malignant hemopathies, myeloma, brain tumors, germ-cell tumors and bone sarcomas;
  • 2 metastatic sites or more;
  • Spine metastasis between T1 and L5 with reduction of vertebrae of 20% at least;
  • Indication of cementoplasty of 1 to 6 vertebrae defined by 1 of the following:
  • Pain equal or greater than 4/10 at Visual Analogic Scale
  • Unstable vertebrae (SINS score equal or greater than 7;
  • Performance Status of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group : 0, 1 or 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to vertebroplasty, including contraindication to cement use;
  • Patient already treated by vertebroplasty within the past 3 months (1 patient can not be allocated twice in this study);
  • Previous focal treatment of the targeted vertebrae (vertebroplasty, percutaneous radiofrequency, embolization);
  • Neurological deficit due to medullar or radicular compression;
  • Participation to another clinical trial with an analgesic intent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional vertebroplasty
Conventional vertebroplasty (device's trade at the discretion of the investigator)
Conventional vertebroplasty
Other Names:
  • Vertebroplasty
Experimental: Kyphoplasty
Vertebroplasty with balloon placement and inflation prior to cement injection (device's trade at the discretion of the investigator)
Placement and inflation of balloon prior to cement injection
Other Names:
  • Balloon kyphoplasty

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate for each strategy
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
The success rate will be calculated with the proportion of patients without cement leakage
3 months after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Height of the targeted vertebrae
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
3 months after the procedure
Height of the patient
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
3 months after the procedure
Kyphotic angle
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
3 months after the procedure
Analgesic properties of the strategies the day after the procedure
Time Frame: The day after the procedure
Pain will be assessed using a Visual Analogic Scale
The day after the procedure
Analgesic properties of the strategies at 21 days
Time Frame: 21 days after the procedure
Pain will be assessed using a Visual Analogic Scale
21 days after the procedure
Analgesic properties of the strategies at the end of the study
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
Pain will be assessed using a Visual Analogic Scale
3 months after the procedure
Tolerance profile of the strategies
Time Frame: Through study completion
Tolerance will be evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Event grading scale version 4
Through study completion
Type of cement leakage (vascular versus cortical localisation)
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
Location will be described as vascular or cortical using the imaging assessments
3 months after the procedure
Size of cement leakage
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
Size will be described as significant or not significant as per investigator judgement
3 months after the procedure
Symptoms associated with cement leakage
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
Symptoms associated with cement leakage will be tolerance events that are stated by the investigator as related to a cement leakage
3 months after the procedure
Quality of Life in both arms at Day 21
Time Frame: 21 days after procedure
Quality of Life will be assessed with the Dallas questionnaire for spinal pain
21 days after procedure
Quality of Life in both arms at the end oh study
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
Quality of Life will be assessed with the Dallas questionnaire for spinal pain
3 months after the procedure
Correlation between volume of cement injected and the level of pain relief using the Visual Analogic Scale
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
3 months after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amine BOUHAMAMA, MD, Centre LEON BERARD

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Solid Tumors

Clinical Trials on Conventional vertebroplasty

3
Subscribe