Efficacy and Safety Study of Nasacort in Chronic Non Allergic and Non Infectious Rhinitis in Adults (RhiCNANI)

December 4, 2009 updated by: Sanofi

A Randomised, Double-blind, French Multi-centre Study, to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerance, in Comparison With Placebo, of Nasacort in Chronic Non Allergic and Non Infectious Rhinitis in Adults

To demonstrate the superiority of the clinical efficacy of 12 weeks' treatment with Nasacort versus placebo in adult patients presenting with Chronic Non Allergic and Non Infectious Rhinitis

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France
        • Sanofi-Aventis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient presenting with Chronic Non Allergic and Non Infectious Rhinitis capable of benefiting from corticosteroid therapy administered via the nasal route.
  • patient with chronic rhinitis of minimum duration 12 weeks, whether or not consecutive, per year.
  • patient with Non Allergic Rhinitis confirmed by negative phadiatop test.
  • patient presenting a mean global score for the 5 symptoms >= 5 (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, disturbance of sense of smell, sneezing, facial heaviness), or mean score for the 3 main symptoms (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, disturbance of sense of smell) >= 5 (mean for 7 days prior to visit V0).
  • patient presenting an inflammation score at anterior rhinoscopy or nasal endoscopy >= 4.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient presenting a nasal polyp
  • patient presenting a severe septal deviation which would interfere with insertion of the nasal spray
  • patient presenting a nasal cavity tumor
  • patient presenting a sinus infection
  • patient presenting a history of endonasal surgery
  • patient presenting a chronic rhinitis of extrinsic origin (drug-related or food-related rhinitis) or intrinsic origin (hormonal rhinitis, positional rhinitis,atrophic rhinitis, ...)
  • patient on a program of intensive sports training
  • patient presenting with : cystic fibrosis, pulmonary mycosis, necrotising vascularitis, immotile cilia syndrome, ....
  • patient presenting with known immunosuppression, lymphoma
  • patient presenting with a known cardiovascular, neurological or other medically significant illness
  • patient presenting with known renal failure, with known glaucoma, with known drug addiction
  • current antibiotic therapy
  • corticosteroids administered in the two months prior to admission
  • patient presenting problems of haemostasis (epistaxis), ophthalmic and/or oro-bucco-nasal herpetic infection.

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
220µg/day or a double spray into each nostril once daily for 12 weeks'treatment
Placebo Comparator: 2
a double spray into each nostril once daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean global score obtained on the basis of 5 evaluations : nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, disturbed sense of smell, sneezing, facial heaviness.
Time Frame: 7 days prior to each visit
7 days prior to each visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
list of undesirable events
Time Frame: during the treatment period
during the treatment period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: M SEBILLE, Dr, Sanofi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

June 27, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2009

Last Verified

December 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rhinitis

Clinical Trials on triamcinolone acetonide

Subscribe