Utility of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in Monitoring Glaucoma Progression

May 20, 2014 updated by: Graham E Trope, University Health Network, Toronto

Glaucoma is a chronic disease defined by characteristic changes in the optic nerve associated initially with loss of peripheral vision and is treated by lowering intraocular (inside the eye) pressure. It has been reported that noticeable changes to the optic nerve caused by glaucoma may occur several years before changes in vision are noticed. Since changes to the optic nerve and other eye structures due to glaucoma are irreversible, it is important to develop tools for the earliest possible detection of changes due to glaucoma.

The Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) is a device that is used to produce a three-dimensional map of the optic nerve and retina, and can be used to detect changes in the optic nerve and retina over time. In previous studies, it has been shown to be useful for the detection of changes due to glaucoma. However, the HRT when compared to other techniques to evaluate the optic nerve such as stereophotography, was found to only somewhat agree.

The current study will compare HRT to stereophotography to determine how good each one is at looking and documenting changes in the optic nerve over time due to glaucoma. Using HRT to initiate early topical medication or to change management requires knowing how well HRT results predict the development of visual loss. Accordingly, the results of this study may affect the management of glaucoma patients by optimizing the follow-up of people with this condition and by initiating appropriate and more individualized treatments. Early treatment is crucial for preventing further visual loss in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension (high pressure inside the eye).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

In glaucoma, treatment decisions depend on the development of morphologic and functional damage. Therefore, damage serves as an indicator of management. Commonly, progression is determined by various perimetric techniques.

However, it has been reported that clinically detectable glaucomatous structural alteration of the ONH may precede the development of reproducible white on white and blue on yellow visual field defects by up to several years.

The HRT is a confocal scanning laser tomography device that creates a three-dimensional topographic analysis of the ONH and the peripapillary retina and includes a statistical analysis to evaluate structural change over time.

This technique showed good sensitivity and high specificity in detecting glaucoma progression when tested using computer simulation. The same good results were obtained by the same authors, in another study, in a small subgroup of 16 patients who were monitored for glaucomatous progression by both HRT and ONH stereophotographs for approximately 5.5 years.

However, in our recent retrospective study, our results demonstrated only fair agreement between HRT and clinical judgment of ONH stereophotographs for progression in glaucoma, for a mean follow-up time with HRT of 2.62 years. Although, the evaluation of the ONH stereophotographs is necessarily subjective, it is widely accepted and has been shown to be effective for evaluating change. Using the stereophotographs assessments as the "reference standard", the HRT sensitivity was 78% and the specificity to 70%. The positive predictive value of the HRT was 47.8%, while the negative predictive value was 90.3%.

According to the results of this study if the frequency of true positives and false positives does not change with longer follow-up, treatment decisions would be based on a test that may be in error 52.2% of the time.

Accordingly, our previous - and other studies - study demonstrated only fair agreement between HRT and clinical judgment of ONH stereophotographs for progression in glaucoma. At present, the available evidence does not appear to be sufficient to show that the addition of HRT improves the ability to predict the development of clinical optic disc change and/or visual field loss.

Therefore the aim of the current study is to investigate the clinical significance of the HRT in monitoring glaucoma progression. In other words we will investigate how well HRT results for glaucomatous progression are able to predict the future development of optic disc and/or visual field changes in patients with OHT and glaucoma.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
        • University of Toronto; Toronto Western Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

University glaucoma unit

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better
  • Subjects determined to have OHT or glaucoma
  • Spherical refraction within 6.0 D with plus or minus sphere, and cylinder within 3.0 D with plus or minus cylinder
  • Subjects that show progression on the HRT
  • subjects stable on ONH stereophotographs
  • subjects with stable and reliable visual fields
  • Subjects willing to make the required visits for the study
  • Subjects tolerant to dilating drops

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A suspicion or actual defect in the visual field of the eye being tested that is explained by the patient's ocular status or history, other than glaucoma
  • Any history of disease or use of medication that may affect visual field reliability
  • Past history of stroke or diabetic retinopathy
  • Inability of the pupils to be dilated to at least 4 mm for the screening visit
  • Inability to undergo either perimetry test or the ophthalmic examination
  • Inability to undergo adequate or better quality stereophotographs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retinal tomography
Time Frame: 8 year study
Journal of OphthalmologyVolume 2014 (2014), Article ID 987389, 12 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/987389 Clinical Significance of Optic Disc Progression by Topographic Change Analysis Maps in Glaucoma: An 8-Year Follow-Up Study D. Kourkoutas,1 Y. M. Buys,2 J. G. Flanagan,2 N. Karamaounas,1 G. Georgopoulos,3 E. Iliakis,3 M. M. Moschos,3 and G. E. Trope2
8 year study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yvonne Buys, MD, FRCSC, University of Toronto, Department of Ophthalmology; Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Study Director: Graham E Trope, PhD, FRCSC, University of Toronto, Department of Ophthalmology; Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Study Chair: John Flanagan, PhD, University of Toronto, Department of Ophthalmology; Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

January 22, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 21, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UHNToronto

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ocular Hypertension

3
Subscribe