Study of Asian Patients With Hypercholesterolaemia in the UK - Rosuvastatin 5mg Versus Atorvastatin 10mg

November 30, 2010 updated by: AstraZeneca

A Phase IV, 6-week, Randomised, Double-blind, Multicentre, Parallel Group, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Rosuvastatin 5mg and Atorvastatin 10mg in UK Asian Subjects With Primary Hypercholesterolaemia

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of rosuvastatin 5mg in lowering blood cholesterol, compared to one other medicine, atorvastatin 10mg in Asian patients in the UK.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Allerton, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
      • Blackburn, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
      • Bolton, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
      • Crawley, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
      • Newcastle, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
      • Slough, United Kingdom
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self described Asian, first or second generation
  • Male or female > or = 18 years with primary hypercholesterolaemia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of cholesterol lowering drugs from visit 1
  • Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia
  • Active arterial disease within 3 months of study entry
  • Poorly controlled diabetes
  • Uncontrolled hypothyroidism
  • Active liver disease
  • History of alcoh/drug abuse.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: rosuvastatin
rosuvastatin 5 mg
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Other Names:
  • Crestor
Active Comparator: atorvastatin
atorvastatin 10 mg
atorvastatin 10 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Change in Low Density Lipoprotein - Cholesterol (LDL-C)
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
Calculated as LDL-C at Week 6 - LDL-C at Week 12] * 100
6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Percentage of Participants Reaching the General Medical Services (GMS) Contract Target of Total Cholesterol (TC) <5 mmol/L
Time Frame: 6 weeks (Baseline) and 12 weeks
6 weeks (Baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage of Participants Reaching the Joint British Societies' Guideline (JBS 2) Targets of TC <4 mmol/L and LDL-C <2 mmol/L
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage of Participants Reaching the European (EAS) Targets of LDL-C<2.5 or 3.00 mmol/L, Depending on Risk Category, and the Combined LDL-C and TC Target of LDL-C<2.5 or 3.0 mmol/L and TC<4.5 or 5.0 mmol/L, Both Depending on Risk Category.
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Risk categories are:

Symptomatic Asymptomatic, total risk <5% Asymptomatic, total risk ≥5%, baseline LDL-C<3 mmol/L and baseline TC<5 mmol/L Asymptomatic, total risk ≥5%, baseline LDL-C ≥3 mmol/L or baseline TC ≥5 mmol/L

Patients are defined as symptomatic if they meet at least 1 of the following criteria:

History of cardiovascular disease Type II diabetes or diabetes of unknown type Baseline TC ≥8 mmol/l Baseline LDL-C ≥6 mmol/l Baseline systolic BP ≥180 mmHg Baseline diastolic BP ≥110 mmHg

Total risk is derived from age, sex, TC, systolic BP and smoking status.

6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage Change From Baseline(week6) in TC
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
Derived according to the following formula: 100*[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6]/Lipid at week 6
6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6) in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
Derived according to the following formula: 100*[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6]/Lipid at week 6
6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage of Participants Reaching the Joint British Societies Guideline (JBS 2) Target of TC <4 mmol/L
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6)in Non-HDL-C
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
Derived according to the following formula: 100*[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6]/Lipid at week 6
6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6) in Apolipoprotein-B (ApoB)
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
Derived according to the following formula: 100*[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6]/Lipid at week 6
6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6) in Apolipoprotein-A1 (ApoA1)
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
Derived according to the following formula: 100*[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6]/Lipid at week 6
6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6)in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
Derived according to the following formula: 100*[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6]/Lipid at week 6
6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6) in TC/HDL-C Ratio
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
Derived according to the following formula: 100*[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6]/Lipid at week 6
6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage Change From Baseline(Week 6) in Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
Derived according to the following formula: 100*[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6]/Lipid at week 6
6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6) in ApoB/ApoA1 Ratio
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
Derived according to the following formula: 100*[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6]/Lipid at week 6
6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks
The Percentage of Participants Reaching the European (EAS) Targets of LDL-C<2.5 or 3.00 mmol/L, Depending on Risk Category.
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Risk categories are:

Symptomatic Asymptomatic, total risk <5% Asymptomatic, total risk ≥5%, baseline LDL-C<3 mmol/L and baseline TC<5 mmol/L Asymptomatic, total risk ≥5%, baseline LDL-C ≥3 mmol/L or baseline TC ≥5 mmol/L

Patients are defined as symptomatic if they meet at least 1 of the following criteria:

History of cardiovascular disease Type II diabetes or diabetes of unknown type Baseline TC ≥8 mmol/l Baseline LDL-C ≥6 mmol/l Baseline systolic BP ≥180 mmHg Baseline diastolic BP ≥110 mmHg

Total risk is derived from age, sex, TC, systolic BP and smoking status.

6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rhiannon Rowsell, MD, AstraZeneca
  • Principal Investigator: Shahid Ali, MD, Bradford PCT

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

January 29, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 16, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2010

Last Verified

November 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypercholesterolaemia

Clinical Trials on Dietary advice

3
Subscribe