Study of a JAK3 Inhibitor for the Prevention of Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Patients

February 8, 2013 updated by: Pfizer

A Phase 2 Randomized, Multicenter, Active Comparator-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Co-administration of CP-690,550 and Mycophenolate Mofetil / Mycophenolate Sodium in De Novo Renal Allograft Recipients

A new immunosuppressive drug, based on the inhibition of an important enzyme in the immune system called JAK3, is being developed by Pfizer to prevent transplant rejection. In this research study, a JAK3 inhibitor or cyclosporine will be given to new kidney transplant patients for 12 months. Patients will be assigned to one of three treatment groups after receiving a kidney transplant. Two of the treatment groups will receive 2 different dosing regimens of the JAK3 inhibitor that will be taken by mouth. The third treatment group will be a standard-of-care control arm. Patients will continue to take the assigned study medication for 12 months as well as other standard transplant medications such as prednisone.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

338

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Woodville, South Australia, Australia, 5011
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Victoria
      • Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3050
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Anderlecht, Belgium, 1070
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • RS
      • Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 90020-090
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • SP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04038-002
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04039-050
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Praha 4, Czech Republic, 140 21
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Paris Cedex 15, France, 75743
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Toulouse Cedex 9, France, 31059
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France, 54500
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Roma, Italy, 00168
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 GD
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Oslo, Norway, 0027
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Warszawa, Poland, 02-006
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Wroclaw, Poland, 50-417
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Coimbra, Portugal, 3000-075
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Lisboa, Portugal, 1069-166
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Barcelona
      • Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08907
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06504
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Gainsville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01107
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01199
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • New Jersey
      • Livingston, New Jersey, United States, 07039
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Valhalla, New York, United States, 10595
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599-7211
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599-7155
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599-7360
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19102
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75204
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recipient of a first-time kidney transplant
  • Between the ages of 18 and 70 years, inclusive

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recipient of any non-kidney transplant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Treatment Arm 1 will also receive standard of care medications
Standard of care
Experimental: 2
Treatment Arm 2 will also receive standard of care medications
CP-690,550 15 mg BID for Months 1-6, then 10 mg BID for Months 7-12
CP-690,550 15 mg BID for Months 1-3, then 10 mg BID for Months 4-12
Experimental: 3
Treatment Arm 3 will also receive standard of care medications
CP-690,550 15 mg BID for Months 1-6, then 10 mg BID for Months 7-12
CP-690,550 15 mg BID for Months 1-3, then 10 mg BID for Months 4-12

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With First Clinical Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Episode 6 Months Post-Transplant
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
Clinical BPAR was a BPAR (category acute rejection as interpreted by the central blinded pathologist according to the Banff 97 working classification) associated with an increase in serum creatinine of >= 0.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) and >=20 percent (%) from pre-rejection baseline. The increase in serum creatinine was assessed based on the comparison of baseline and the highest serum creatinine recorded within 24 hours (hrs) of the time of biopsy.
Baseline up to Month 6
Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 12
Time Frame: 2, 3, 4, and 5 hrs post iohexol intravenous bolus at Month 12
GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was calculated using iohexol serum clearance. For determination of iohexol serum clearance, iohexol was administered as an intravenous bolus over 5 minutes immediately after morning dosing of CP-690,550 or CsA on day of GFR evaluation. A normal GFR is greater than (>) 90 milliliter per minute (mL/min), although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR less than (<) 15 mL/min indicated kidney failure.
2, 3, 4, and 5 hrs post iohexol intravenous bolus at Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6
Time Frame: 2, 3, 4, and 5 hrs post iohexol intravenous bolus at Month 6
GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was calculated using iohexol serum clearance. For determination of iohexol serum clearance, iohexol was administered as an intravenous bolus over 5 minutes immediately after morning dosing of CP-690,550 or CsA on day of GFR evaluation. A normal GFR is >90 mL/min, although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min indicated kidney failure.
2, 3, 4, and 5 hrs post iohexol intravenous bolus at Month 6
Number of Participants With Progression of Chronic Allograft Lesions at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Progression of chronic allograft lesions was defined as an increase in the Banff chronicity score (Banff-CS) in biopsy from the implantation (baseline) biopsy in a given participant. Banff-CS was the sum of the Banff scores for the 4 chronic basic lesions (allograft glomerulopathy [cg] + interstitial fibrosis [ci] + tubular atrophy [ct] + vascular intimal thickening [cv]).The Banff-CS ranged from 0-12, higher score indicated greater lesions and Month 12 Banff-CS greater than the implantation biopsy score indicated progression of lesions.
Month 12
Number of Participants With First Clinical Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) 12 Months Post Transplant
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 12
Clinical BPAR was a BPAR (category acute rejection as interpreted by the central blinded pathologist according to the Banff 97 working classification) associated with an increase in serum creatinine of >= 0.3 mg/dL and >=20% from pre-rejection baseline. The increase in serum creatinine was assessed based on the comparison of baseline and the highest serum creatinine recorded within 24 hrs of the time of biopsy.
Baseline up to Month 12
Number of Participants With Treated Clinical Acute Rejection
Time Frame: Month 6, 12
Treated clinical acute rejection was defined as an acute rejection episode that was diagnosed based on local biopsy readout and received anti-rejection treatment.
Month 6, 12
Number of Participants With Combined Banff Rejection Categories (Categories 2, 3, and 4)
Time Frame: Month 6, 12
Banff 97: standard classification for scoring and classifying rejection of kidney transplant biopsies in 6 diagnostic categories: normal, antibody-mediated rejection, borderline changes: 'suspicious' for acute cellular rejection, acute/active cellular rejection, chronic/sclerosing allograft nephropathy, and other. Combined Banff rejection calculated from categories of antibody-mediated rejection (Category 2) plus borderline changes (Category 3) plus acute rejection (Category 4), as interpreted by the central pathologist.
Month 6, 12
Number of Participants With Graft Loss
Time Frame: Month 6, 12
Graft loss was defined as graft nephrectomy, participant death, re-transplantation, or return to dialysis for >=6 consecutive weeks.
Month 6, 12
Number of Participants With Efficacy Failure
Time Frame: Month 6, 12
Efficacy failure was the first occurrence of clinical BPAR diagnosed by the central pathologist or graft loss including participant death.
Month 6, 12
Number of Participants Who Died
Time Frame: Month 6, 12
Month 6, 12
Lymphocyte Subset
Time Frame: Month 1, 3, 6, 12
The absolute cell counts of cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3): T-lymphocytes, cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19): B-lymphocytes, and cluster of differentiation 56 (CD56): assumed natural killer cells, were determined using flow cytometry.
Month 1, 3, 6, 12
Population Pharmacokinetics (PK)
Time Frame: Pre-dose-2(P-2), Pre-dose(P), 0.5,1,2 hr post-dose(PD) on Day14, Month(M) 3; P,1,2 hr PD on M1; P, 0.5, 2, 4 hr PD on M6; P-2, P, 0.5 hr PD on M9, M12 as per randomization in CP-690,550 treated; P on M3 and P, 2, 4 hr PD on M6 in CsA treated participants
Data for this Outcome Measure are not reported here because the analysis population includes participants who were not enrolled in this study. ClinicalTrials.gov is designed for reporting results from only those participants who were enrolled in the study and described in the Participant Flow and Baseline Characteristics modules.
Pre-dose-2(P-2), Pre-dose(P), 0.5,1,2 hr post-dose(PD) on Day14, Month(M) 3; P,1,2 hr PD on M1; P, 0.5, 2, 4 hr PD on M6; P-2, P, 0.5 hr PD on M9, M12 as per randomization in CP-690,550 treated; P on M3 and P, 2, 4 hr PD on M6 in CsA treated participants
Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by The Nankivell Equation
Time Frame: Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was measured directly or estimated using established formulas. GFR was calculated was estimated by creatinine clearance (CLcr) using Nankivell equation. CLcr by Nankivell equation= (6.7 per serum creatinine) plus (0.25*body weight) minus (0.5*serum urea) minus (100 per height square) plus (35 for male/25 for female). A normal GFR is >90 mL/min, although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min indicated kidney failure.
Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by The Cockcroft-Gault Equation
Time Frame: Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was measured directly or estimated using established formulas. GFR was calculated using Cockcroft-Gault equation. GFR by Cockcroft-Gault equation= body weight*(140 minus age in years) divided by (72*serum creatinine). For females value obtained was multiplied by 0.85. A normal GFR is >90 mL/min, although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min indicated kidney failure.
Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation
Time Frame: Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was calculated using MDRD equation. GFR by MDRD equation = 170 * (serum creatinine)^(-0.999) * (age in years)^(-0.176) * (0.762 if female) * (1.18 if black) * (blood urea nitrogen concentration)^(-0.170) * (serum albumin concentration)^(0.318).A normal GFR is >90 mL/min/1.73 square meter (m^2), although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2 indicated kidney failure.
Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by The Abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation
Time Frame: Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was measured directly or estimated using established formulas. GFR was calculated using abbreviated MDRD equation. GFR by abbreviated MDRD equation= 186 * (serum creatinine)^(-1.154) * (age in years)^(-0.203) * (0.742 if female) * (1.210 if black). A normal GFR is >90 mL/min/1.73 m^2, although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2 indicated kidney failure.
Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Infections
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 12
Clinically significant infection was defined as the presence of documented infection confirmed by culture, biopsy, genomic, or serologic findings post-randomization and requiring hospitalization or parenteral anti-infective treatment, or otherwise deemed significant by the investigator.
Baseline up to Month 12
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12
SF-36: standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical and mental component scores. Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales,2 composite subscales and Question(Q) 2 "how would you rate your health in general now?"(range 1=better, 5=worst). The score for a section (except Q2) is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Baseline, Month 6, 12
End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist Transplantation Module (ESRD-SCL)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12
ESRD-SCL:43-item disease specific self-administered questionnaire. Participants' rated question"At the moment,how much do you suffer?"for each item on 5 point scale,ranged (Ra) 0(not at all)to 4(extremely).Consisted of 6 subscales:cardiac and renal dysfunction;Ra 0-28,increased(In) growth of gum and hair;Ra 0-20,limited cognitive capacity;Ra 0-32,limited physical capacity;Ra 0 - 40,side effects (SEs) of corticosteroids;Ra 0-20,transplantation associated psychological distress(TAPD);Ra 0-32(higher scores=greater dysfunction for each subscale).Total score:0-172,higher scores=greater dysfunction.
Baseline, Month 6, 12
Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (SODA)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12
SODA:17-item health scale, assessed participant-reported perceptions of dyspepsia;consists of 3 subscales:Pain Intensity (6-items to assess pain and intensity of abdominal [Ab] discomfort; Range (Ra):2-47, higher score= greater pain and Ab discomfort), Non-Pain Symptoms (7-items to assess severity and impact of non-pain symptoms:burping/belching,heartburn,bloating,flatulence,sour taste,nausea,and bad breath; Ra:7-35,higher scores = increased symptom severity and influence), and Satisfaction (4-items to assess degree of satisfaction with Ab discomfort; Ra:2-23,higher scores= more satisfaction).
Baseline, Month 6, 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

June 7, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 14, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Transplantation

Clinical Trials on Cyclosporine

3
Subscribe