A Clinical Study of the Arctic Front Cryoablation Balloon for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (Stop-AF)

September 17, 2018 updated by: Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Catheter Cryoablation in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

This study (STOP AF) is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, pivotal clinical investigation conducted at 26 investigational sites in the United States and Canada. Subjects with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) referred for ablative intervention after efficacy failure of one or more Study Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Drugs (flecainide, propafenone or sotalol) were randomized 2:1 to cryoablation intervention (Experimental Subjects, ES) or to a Study AF Drug (Control Subjects, CS). Subjects were followed for 12 months with scheduled and symptom-driven assessments to detect recurrent atrial fibrillation by means of periodic electrocardiograms, weekly scheduled trans-telephonic monitoring, patient-initiated trans-telephonic monitoring, and 24-hour Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months. The first 90 days after study therapy was initiated was considered a blanked period for all subjects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

STOP AF (PS-023) is a randomized, controlled study of subjects 18 to 75 years old who had been referred for ablative intervention after failing one or two (but not all three) anti-arrhythmic drugs used in the treatment of AF (flecainide, propafenone and sotalol). Study subjects were randomized into two arms: the cryoablation (treatment) arm and the membrane-active antiarrhythmic drug (control) arm. A 90- day blanked follow-up period, including reablation and medication adjustments was applied in both arms to optimize therapies. All subjects underwent follow-up assessments at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, weekly transtelephonic monitoring, 24-hour Holter monitoring and CT/MRI of the pulmonary veins(at 6 and 12 months) during the trial period. Control subjects who were confirmed to be chronic treatment failures were permitted to crossover to cryoablation in this trial.

Acute procedural success was defined for subjects that underwent cryoablation and demonstrated electrical isolation in ≥ 3 Pulmonary Veins (PVs) at the conclusion of the first protocol-defined cryoablation procedure using the Arctic Front® Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter System.

The primary effectiveness endpoint was defined as having acute procedural success and freedom from chronic treatment failure (CTF) for experimental subjects, and freedom from CTF for control subjects. Freedom from (CTF) was defined for both groups as the occurrence of detectable AF during a non-blanked follow-up period, or an AF Intervention, or the use of a non-study AF drug at any time.

The co-primary safety outcome measures were Cryoablation Procedure Events (CPEs) in cryoablated subjects and Major Atrial Fibrillation Events (MAFEs) in both groups. CPEs were device- or procedure-related serious adverse events.

Other safety assessments were made during the course of the STOP AF trial specific to pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) and phrenic nerve injury.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

245

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A5A5
        • London Medical Health Sciences
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C8
        • Montreal Heart Institute
      • Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G5
        • Laval Hospital
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294-0007
        • University of Alabama
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
        • Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedar Sinai Medical Center
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 98517
        • UC Davis Medical Center
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305-5233
        • Stanford hospital
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80907
        • Colorado Cardiac Alliance -- Memorial Hospital
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic- Jacksonville
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33607
        • BayHeart Group -- St-Joseph's Hospital
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
        • Piedmont Hospital
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
        • Emery Crawford Long Hospital
    • Iowa
      • Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50314
        • Iowa Heart Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55902
        • Mayo Clinic
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87102
        • New Mexico Heart Institute
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104-4283
        • University of Pennsylvania Health
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75226
        • Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital
    • Virginia
      • Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22042
        • Inova Research Center
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
        • Sentara CV Research Institute
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23219
        • Medical College of Virginia
    • Wisconsin
      • Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States, 54301-3596
        • Cardiology Associates of Green Bay
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53215
        • Arrhythmia Center of Southern WI

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF): PAF diagnosis, 2 episodes of PAF within the last 2 months, at least 1 episode of PAF must be documented
  • Age 18-75
  • Documented Effectiveness Failure of one (1) AF drug
  • Willing to be randomized to either group and do full 12 month follow-up
  • Able to follow standardized AF drug protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any cardioversion within 3 months or more than 2 within 2 years
  • Amiodarone within 6 months
  • LA size > 5.0cm
  • Previous LA ablation/surgery, structural heart disease, heart failure class III or IV
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Mitral prosthesis
  • Unstable angina, uncontrolled hyperthyroidism
  • Stroke or TIA within 6 months, MI within 2 months, cardiac surgery within 3 months
  • Thrombocytosis, thrombocytopenia
  • Any condition contraindicating chronic anticoagulation
  • EF <40%
  • Pregnancy
  • Life expectancy <1year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental
Experimental subjects received cryoablation intended to isolate the pulmonary veins and ablate arrhythmia foci. If necessary, experimental subjects were allowed a previously failed Study Atrial Fibrillation Drug (AF Drug).
Experimental Subjects received cryoablation intended to isolate the pulmonary veins and ablate arrhythmia foci with the cryoablation catheter system.
Other Names:
  • Arctic Front® Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter System
  • Artic Front®
Active Comparator: Control
Control Subjects were treated with an AF Drug (flecainide, propafenone, or sotalol) that they had not previously failed.
Flecainide 200 mg / day Propafenone 450 mg / day Propafenone-SR 650 mg / day Sotalol 240 mg / day
Other Names:
  • Tambocor
  • Sotalol
  • Propafenone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute Procedural Success (APS)
Time Frame: 371.4 Minutes (Average)
Acute Procedural Success was defined as a demonstration of electrical isolation in ≥ 3 Pulmonary Veins (PVs) at the conclusion of the first protocol-defined cryoablation procedure. APS was decided at the end of the procedure the mean time was calculated for the time frame.
371.4 Minutes (Average)
Freedom From Chronic Treatment Failure (CTF)
Time Frame: 12 month follow up period
Subjects that did not have or were free of CTF. CTF was defined as the occurence of an Atrial Fibrillation (AF) intervention, use of non-study AF drug therapy, or the occurence of detectable AF which is is defined as an episode of AF, documented in a tracing, and lasting more than 30 seconds, occurring during a Non Blanked Follow-up Period.
12 month follow up period
Treatment Success
Time Frame: 12 months
Treatment Success was defined as Acute Procedure Success (APS) and freedom from Chronic Treatment Failure (CTF) for Experimental Subjects, and freedom from CTF for Control Subjects. Under this pre-specified definition of Treatment Success, Experimental Subjects must have had APS and remained free of CTF during the 12-month follow-up duration, while Control Subjects must have remained free of CTF during the 12-month follow-up duration.
12 months
Freedom From Major Atrial Fibrillation Events (MAFEs)
Time Frame: 12 Months
Subjects that did not have or were free of MAFEs. MAFEs were serious adverse events categorized as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for AF recurrence/ablation, flutter ablation, embolic events, heart failure, hemorrhage or anti-arrhythmic drug treatment.
12 Months
Cryoablation Procedure Events (CPEs)
Time Frame: To end of ablation procedure
Subjects that had CPEs. CPEs were device- or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAE) categorized as access site complications, cardiac damage, pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis, embolic complications, arrhythmias, unresolved phrenic nerve palsy and death.
To end of ablation procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Douglas L. Packer, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

September 3, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Arctic Front® Cryoablation Catheter

3
Subscribe