Effectiveness, Safety and Immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals' HPV Vaccine GSK580299 (Cervarix) Administered in Healthy Adolescents

October 30, 2019 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Two Vaccination Strategies Using GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals' HPV Vaccine GSK580299 (Cervarix) Administered in Healthy Adolescents

Genital infections with oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPV) are common in both men and women. The most important disease associated with oncogenic HPV infection is cervical cancer, currently the second leading cause of cancer-related death among women globally. The current study is designed to evaluate the overall impact of HPV immunization in adolescents 12-15 years of age.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34412

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kotka, Finland, 48100
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kuopio, Finland, 70100
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Lahti, Finland, 15110
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Rauma, Finland, 26100
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tampere, Finland, 33100
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Turku, Finland, 20100
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Study participants who the investigator or delegate believes that they and/or their parents/legally acceptable representative can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol (e.g. completion of the diary cards, return for follow-up visits) should be enrolled in the study.
  • A male or female between, and including, 12 and 15 years of age at the time of the first vaccination.

A written informed assent must be obtained from all study participants prior to enrolment. In addition, a written informed consent must be obtained from the study participants' parent or legally acceptable representative.

Note: As according to the Finnish law legal age of consent is 15 years, a written informed consent form can be obtained from study participants aged 15 years old and their parent(s)/legally acceptable representative(s) will receive a letter informing them of their child participation to the study.

  • Healthy male and female study participants as established by medical history before entering into the study. If needed, a history-directed clinical examination will be performed by the investigator or delegate (e.g. study nurse).
  • Study participants must not be pregnant. Absence of pregnancy should be verified (e.g. urine pregnancy test) as per investigator's or delegate's clinical judgement.
  • If the study participant is female, she must be of non-childbearing potential, i.e. be abstinent, have a current tubal ligation, hysterectomy, ovariectomy or be post-menopausal or pre-menarcheal, or if she is of childbearing potential, she must use adequate contraception for 30 days prior to vaccination and continue for 2 months after completion of the vaccination series.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous vaccination against HPV or Hepatitis B virus.
  • History of allergic disease or reactions likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccines.
  • Acute disease at the time of enrolment. (Acute disease is defined as the presence of a moderate or severe illness with or without fever. All vaccines can be administered to persons with a minor illness such as diarrhoea, mild upper respiratory infection with or without low-grade febrile illness, i.e. Oral temperature <37.5°C (99.5°F) / Axillary temperature <37.5°C (99.5°F) / Rectal temperature <38°C (100.4°F).)
  • Pregnant or lactating female.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group
The A group includes subjects from communities where 70% of male and female adolescents were to be vaccinated with Cervarix vaccine. To achieve a Cervarix vaccination coverage of 70%, a 9:1 ratio was used to allocate study participants to receive Cervarix vaccine versus control Engerix-B vaccine (meaning 90% of vaccinated subjects were randomized to Cervarix). Finally, subjects from A group were either vaccinated with Cervarix, Engerix-B (control vaccine), or not vaccinated (enrolled control without vaccination). Vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm according to a 0, 1, 6-month schedule.
Intramuscular injection, 3 doses
Intramuscular injection, 3 doses
Experimental: Cervarix/Engerix-B B Group
The B group includes subjects from communities where 70% of female adolescents were to be vaccinated with Cervarix vaccine. To achieve a Cervarix vaccination coverage of 70%, a 9:1 ratio was used to allocate female participants to receive Cervarix vaccine versus control Engerix-B vaccine (meaning 90% of vaccinated females were randomized to Cervarix). In this group, all male adolescents were to be vaccinated with Engerix-B control vaccine. Finally, subjects from B group were either vaccinated with Cervarix (females) or Engerix-B/not vaccinated (males and females). Vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm according to a 0, 1, 6-month schedule.
Intramuscular injection, 3 doses
Intramuscular injection, 3 doses
Active Comparator: Engerix-B Group
In this control group, all adolescents were to be vaccinated with Engerix-B control vaccine. Finally, subjects from this group were either vaccinated with Engerix-B or not vaccinated. The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm according to a 0, 1, 6-month schedule.
Intramuscular injection, 3 doses

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Infection With Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-16/18 Types in Cervarix/Engerix-B B Group Versus Engerix-B Group and in Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group Versus Engerix-B Group
Time Frame: At the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis of overall effectiveness of Cervarix vaccine against genital infection with HPV-16/18 types was based on stratified Mantel-Haenszel adjusted for clustering. The overall vaccine effectiveness was computed as 1- the prevalence odd ratio in all subjects from the investigated group (prevalence rate in all subjects from the investigated group/prevalence rate in all subjects from Engerix-B Group).
At the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Infection With HPV-16/18 Types in Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group Versus Cervarix/Engerix-B B Group
Time Frame: At the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)

The analysis of overall effectiveness of Cervarix vaccine against genital infection with HPV-16/18 types was based on stratified Mantel-Haenszel adjusted for clustering. The overall vaccine effectiveness was computed as 1- the prevalence odd ratio in all subjects from the investigated group (prevalence rate in all subjects from the Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group/prevalence rate in all subjects from Engerix-B Group).

Note: As per Protocol and as the confirmatory objectives were not met, only exploratory interpretation could be performed for what concerns this secondary outcome measure.

At the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Oncogenic Infection With Specific HPV Types
Time Frame: At the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis of overall effectiveness of Cervarix vaccine against genital infection with specific HPV types (16, 18, 31/45, 31/33/45, 31/33/45/51, 31/33/45/51/52, 31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, 16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, 6, 11, 6/11, 6/11/53/74) was based on stratified Mantel-Haenszel adjusted for clustering. The effectiveness was computed as 1- the prevalence odd ratio in all subjects from the investigated group (prevalence rate in all subjects from the investigated group/prevalence rate in all subjects from Engerix-B Group).
At the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
Number of Female Subjects With Total Vaccine Effectiveness Against Oropharyngeal Infection With HPV-16/18 Types
Time Frame: At the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis of total effectiveness of Cervarix vaccine against oropharyngeal infection with HPV-16/18 types was based on stratified Mantel-Haenszel adjusted for clustering. The effectiveness was computed as 1- the prevalence odd ratio in Cervarix vaccinated subjects from the investigated group (prevalence rate in Cervarix vaccinated subjects from the investigated group/prevalence rate in all subjects from Engerix-B Group).
At the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
Number of Female Subjects With Total Vaccine Effectiveness Against Oropharyngeal Oncogenic Infection With Specific HPV Types
Time Frame: At the time of Visit 5 (at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis of total effectiveness of Cervarix vaccine against oropharyngeal infection with specific HPV types (16, 18, 31/45, 31/33/45, 31/33/45/51, 31/33/45/51/52, 31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, 16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, 6, 11, 6/11, 6/11/53/74) was based on stratified Mantel-Haenszel adjusted for clustering. The effectiveness was computed as 1- the prevalence odd ratio in all Cervarix vaccinated subjects from the investigated group (prevalence rate in all Cervarix vaccinated subjects from the investigated group/prevalence rate in all subjects from Engerix-B Group).
At the time of Visit 5 (at 18.5 years of age)
Number of Male Subjects Reporting Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms, in a Subset of Subjects
Time Frame: During the 7-day post-vaccination period following each dose and across doses
Assessed solicited local symptoms were pain, redness and swelling. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 pain = pain that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 redness/swelling = redness/swelling spreading beyond 50 millimeters (mm) of injection site.
During the 7-day post-vaccination period following each dose and across doses
Number of Male Subjects Reporting Any, Grade 3 and Related to Vaccination Solicited General Symptoms, in a Subset of Subjects
Time Frame: During the 7-day post-vaccination period following each dose and across doses
Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature equal to or above 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], gastrointestinal symptoms (including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or abdominal pain), headache, myalgia, rash and urticaria. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 symptom = symptom that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = fever > 39.0 °C. Related = symptom assessed by the investigator as related to the vaccination.
During the 7-day post-vaccination period following each dose and across doses
Number of Male Subjects Reporting Any, Grade 3 and Related to Vaccination Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs), in a Subset of Subjects
Time Frame: Within the 30-day post-vaccination period
An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination. Grade 3 AE = an AE which prevented normal, everyday activities. Related = AE assessed by the investigator as related to the vaccination.
Within the 30-day post-vaccination period
Number of Male Subjects With Urticaria/Rash Within 30 Minutes After Each Vaccination Dose, in a Subset of Subjects
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes following each vaccination dose
The number of subjects with urticaria/rash assessed within 30 minutes following each vaccine dose are reported. Confirmed urticaria/rash = subjects who reported urticaria/rash within the specified time frame. Not confirmed urticaria/rash = number of subjects who did not report urticaria/rash within the specified time frame.
Within 30 minutes following each vaccination dose
Number of Male Subjects Reporting Medically Significant Conditions (MSCs), in a Subset of Subjects
Time Frame: From Dose 1 (at Day 0) until Month 12
MSCs are defined as AEs prompting emergency room or physician visits that are not (1) related to common diseases or (2) routine visits for physical examination or vaccination, or SAEs that are not related to common diseases. Common diseases include: upper respiratory infections, sinusitis, pharyngitis, gastroenteritis, urinary tract infections and injury.
From Dose 1 (at Day 0) until Month 12
Number of Male Subjects Reporting Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and SAEs Causally Related to Vaccination, in a Subset of Subjects
Time Frame: From Dose 1 (at Day 0) until Month 12
Serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed include medical occurrences that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or resulted in disability/incapacity.
From Dose 1 (at Day 0) until Month 12
Number of Subjects Reporting SAEs Assessed by the Investigator as Possibly Related to Vaccination
Time Frame: During the entire study period (from Day 0 up to Visit 5 [18.5 years of age] or up to the day before 19 years of age for subjects who did not attend Visit 5)
Serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed include medical occurrences that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or resulted in disability/incapacity.
During the entire study period (from Day 0 up to Visit 5 [18.5 years of age] or up to the day before 19 years of age for subjects who did not attend Visit 5)
Number of Subjects With New Onset of Autoimmune Diseases (NOADs), Retrieved From Care Register for Social Welfare and Health Care (HILMO)
Time Frame: During the entire study period (from day 0 up to Visit 5 [at 18.5 years of age] or up to the day before 19 years of age for subjects who did not attend Visit 5)
NOADs include colitis ulcerative, juvenile arthritis, type 1 diabetes mellitus, coeliac disease and Chron's disease, Basedow's disease, erythema nodosum VIIth nerve paralysis and psoriasis.
During the entire study period (from day 0 up to Visit 5 [at 18.5 years of age] or up to the day before 19 years of age for subjects who did not attend Visit 5)
Number of Subjects Reporting Pregnancies and Outcomes of Reported Pregnancies With Onset During the Study Period, Retrieved From Medical Birth Registry and HILMO
Time Frame: During the entire study period (from Day 0 up to Visit 5 [at 18.5 years of age] or up to the day before 19 years of age for subjects who did not attend Visit 5)

Pregnancies with onset during the study were classified by their outcome. Outcomes included live infant with no apparent congenital anomaly, elective termination with no apparent congenital anomaly, spontaneous abortion with no apparent congenital anomaly, ectopic pregnancy, stillbirth with no apparent congenital anomaly and molar pregnancy.

Note: The analysis was performed based on the corrected demographical data. Please refer to the rationale provided in the Baseline characteristics section.

During the entire study period (from Day 0 up to Visit 5 [at 18.5 years of age] or up to the day before 19 years of age for subjects who did not attend Visit 5)
Number of Subjects With HPV-16 and HPV-18 Antibody Concentrations Equal to or Above the Cut-off Values, by Gender, in a Subset of Subjects
Time Frame: At the time of Visit 1 (at Day 0), Visit 4 (at Month 7) and Visit 5 (at 18.5 years of age)
The antibody concentrations against HPV-16 and HPV-18 were determined by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The cut-off of the assay was 8 ELISA units per milliliter (EL.U/mL) for anti-HPV-16 and 7 EL.U/mL for anti-HPV-18 at Visits 1 and 4 and 19 EL.U/mL for HPV-16 and 18 EL.U/mL for HPV-18 at Visit 5.
At the time of Visit 1 (at Day 0), Visit 4 (at Month 7) and Visit 5 (at 18.5 years of age)
Anti-HPV-16 and Anti-HPV-18 Antibody Concentrations, by Gender, in a Subset of Subjects
Time Frame: At the time of Visit 1 (Day 0), Visit 4 (at Month 7) and at the time of Visit 5 (18.5 years of age)
The antibody concentrations against HPV-16 and HPV-18 were determined by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The cut-off of the assay was 8 ELISA units per milliliter (EL.U/mL) for anti-HPV-16 and 7 EL.U/mL for anti-HPV-18 at Visits 1 and 4 and 19 EL.U/mL for HPV-16 and 18 EL.U/mL for HPV-18 at Visit 5.
At the time of Visit 1 (Day 0), Visit 4 (at Month 7) and at the time of Visit 5 (18.5 years of age)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 17, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 17, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

September 26, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 106636
  • 2007-001731-55 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (click on the link provided below).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (click on the link provided below).

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Study Data/Documents

  1. Individual Participant Data Set
    Information identifier: 106636
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  2. Statistical Analysis Plan
    Information identifier: 106636
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  3. Clinical Study Report
    Information identifier: 106636
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  4. Dataset Specification
    Information identifier: 106636
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  5. Informed Consent Form
    Information identifier: 106636
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  6. Study Protocol
    Information identifier: 106636
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  7. Annotated Case Report Form
    Information identifier: 106636
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infections, Papillomavirus

Clinical Trials on Cervarix

3
Subscribe