fMRI Study Examining Effects of D-cycloserine in Specific Phobia

June 1, 2017 updated by: Cary Savage, Ph.D., University of Kansas Medical Center

An fMRI Study Investigating the Effects of Acute D-cycloserine Administration on Brain Activations and Cognitive Functioning in Spider Phobia.

The research team hopes to use brain imaging and mental testing to learn more about specific phobias and the treatment of phobia. When given directly prior to therapy sessions, D-cycloserine has been shown to enhance the effects of therapy. This study hopes to identify reasons why D-cycloserine has this effect by measuring brain activity.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) therapy has become the treatment of choice for specific phobias. ERP involves systematic and repeated exposure to a feared or anxiety-provoking stimulus, leading to habituation and extinction of the fear response. Animal models of fear extinction have shown that acute administration of D-cycloserine (DCS) prior to exposure to a feared stimulus enhances extinction of that fear. A recent study in human subjects with height phobia (a specific phobia) has also demonstrated that DCS facilitates the effects of ERP therapy. Current theories postulate that DCS facilitates fear extinction by enhancing the learning process and increasing consolidation of memories, but the neural mechanisms underlying this process are not understood. The proposed research aims to elucidate these mechanisms by using fMRI to measure brain activation during 1) symptom provocation and verbal learning two hours post-medication, and 2)repeated symptom provocation and verbal recognition one week post-medication. This research will also examine the effects of DCS on cognitive functioning using neuropsychological testing both two house and one week post-medication.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas Medical Center, Hoglund Brain Imaging Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Right-handed
  • Adults between 18 and 55 years of age
  • Subjects in the phobic group will additionally meet diagnostic (DSM-IV) criteria for spider phobia.
  • Individuals of both genders and all races will be included

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are breastfeeding or pregnant
  • Individuals with medical conditions unsuitable for MR scanning
  • Individuals reporting a history of epilepsy or seizures
  • Individuals reporting an allergy to cycloserine
  • Individuals diagnosed with asthma or who report previous anaphylactic reaction to insect stings/bites, medication, food, or other material and/or event
  • Individuals reporting present or past diagnosis of a developmental disorder, neurological disorder, or head injury *Individuals found to have Axis I psychopathology as defined by the DSM-IV (other than spider phobia)
  • Individuals currently taking any psychotropic medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Non-Phobic Control - Placebo
Participants without phobia will be given one placebo administration.
Placebo
Other Names:
  • Sugar pill
Active Comparator: Non-Phobic Control - DCS
Participants without phobia will be given one D-cycloserine (DCS) administration of 100mg.
D-cycloserine
Other Names:
  • Cycloserine
Placebo Comparator: Spider-phobic Placebo
Participants with phobia will be given one placebo administration.
Placebo
Other Names:
  • Sugar pill
Experimental: Spider-phobic DCS
Participants with phobia will be given one D-cycloserine (DCS) administration of 100mg.
D-cycloserine
Other Names:
  • Cycloserine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
fMRI Brain Activations During Symptom Provocation
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Regions of interest (ROIs) were specified based on previous research and included amygdala, insula, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC), and hippocampus. Multiple regression analyses were used to examine differences in response between experimental conditions (spider versus butterfly images). For significant clusters of activation within ROIs, the average max percent signal change is reported. For other regions, the average max percent signal change is reported within a sphere centered at coordinates identified via previous research.
2 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Functioning Measured Using the Wechsler Memory Scale III (Logical Memory and Faces Subtests)
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
This scale measures the learning and memory of functioning adults. Logical Memory I and II and Faces I and II subtests were administered to participants. The tasks measure verbal and visual memory, respectively. Scoring is based on the number of story details or faces correctly recalled during immediate (Logical Memory I, Faces I) and 30 minute delayed (Logical Memory II, Faces II) conditions. Total score ranges from 0-75 on Logical Memory I, 0-50 on Logical Memory II, 0-48 on Faces I, and 0-48 on Faces II. For all subtests, higher scores indicate better memory performance.
2 Weeks
Cognitive Functioning Measured Using the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The RCFT assesses the a person's ability to use cues to retrieve information. The test measures visuospatial construction and memory. A person is asked to draw a figure. The figure is broken down into 18 elements. The score is based on their presence, completeness, and correct placement. Each element is scored from 0-2. The Copy, Immediate, and Delay results are scored on a 36 point scale. The higher the score, the better the person performed on the test with a 0 being the minimum and 36 being the maximum score. The organization score is scored according to whether the participant drew five cohesive units of the figure together, for a range of 0-6 and a higher score indicating better organizational performance.
2 weeks
Cognitive Functioning Measured Using the Iowa Gambling Test
Time Frame: 2 weeks
This test measures a person's emotional decision making. Participants are presented with virtual decks of cards on a computer. Participants are told that each card they draw will "win" them game money. However, sometimes cards result in "losing" game money. The task includes 100 trials and the total score represents the number of cards drawn from "bad" decks as compared to "good" or safe decks. Thus, the score ranges from -100 to +100, with higher sores representing better performance.
2 weeks
Cognitive Functioning Measured Using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Task measures executive functioning and cognitive flexibility. The task uses a deck of 64 cards that the participant must sort according to specified rules. The test is stopped when when six sequences of 10 correct responses have been achieved, or after the deck has been completed twice, which provides a cumulative total of 128 trials. We report the number of errors on the task, which has a range of 0 -128, with a higher score representing worse performance.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cary Savage, PhD, University of Kansas Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 10362
  • GCRC 0046 (Other Identifier: University of Kansas Medical Center)
  • HSCL 15970 (Other Identifier: University of Kansas)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Phobias

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe