Black Widow Spider Antivenin for Patients With Systemic Latrodectism (BWSP3)

March 7, 2018 updated by: Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.

A Phase III Multicenter Clinical Trial of Analatro® [Antivenin Latrodectus (Black Widow) Equine Immune F(ab)2] in Patients With Systemic Latrodectism

The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy and safety of a new antivenom called Analatro® for treating black widow spider bites in patients who present to a hospital emergency room within 24 hours of symptom onset. This study will be a phase III, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled study that takes place in emergency departments. The primary aim of this study is to determine the proportion of patients in which pain control was not achieved by 48 hours post treatment. Secondary aims are as follows: 1) a reduction in pain intensity at the end of the treatment phase compared to baseline; 2) the proportion of patients with a clinically significant decrease in pain intensity at 30 minutes post-treatment; 3) the proportion of patients in which drug-related adverse events occurred; and 4) to determine if serious, drug-related adverse events in Analatro-treated patients occurred at a rate greater than one in 10 (10%).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V. has developed Analatro®, an antibody fragment (Fab2) containing widow spider (Latrodectus) antivenom, and proposes to conduct a clinical trial in hospital emergency departments to assess the efficacy and safety of this product in patients with moderate to severe pain associated with Latrodectus envenomation (latrodectism). The primary objectives of this Phase III, multi-center, double-blind, controlled study are as follows:

To determine the efficacy of Analatro compared to control for the treatment of latrodectism as measured by the proportion of patients in whom pain control is not achieved (e.g., treatment failure)

To further characterize the safety profile of Analatro, including comparison of the rate of drug-related adverse events to control for the treatment of latrodectism

The flow of study procedures are illustrated in the chart on the following page. All patients who consent to participate will be given a visual analog scale (VAS, 0=no pain to 100mm=worst possible pain) for assessing pain intensity. Patients that meet all study enrollment requirements, including a minimum age of 10 years, a clinical diagnosis of latrodectism and a VAS pain score of ≥40 mm (moderate to severe pain) will be randomly assigned to be treated with Analatro or control. A screening phase will be completed, during which time preliminary procedures will be performed by the investigator (medical history, physical exam, and pregnancy test as applicable) and two doses of Analatro or two doses of saline control will be prepared. Fentanyl may be administered intravenously as needed for pain relief during the screening phase at a dosage not to exceed 1.5 µg/kg/hr. At the end of the screening phase, baseline measurements (vital signs, VAS pain score) will be performed. Patients must have a baseline VAS score ≥40 mm to receive study medication.

Eligible patients will begin a 2.5 hour treatment phase. Dose 1 of study medication (50 mL) will be infused intravenously over 10 minutes. Thirty minutes after the start of Dose 1, pain intensity will be assessed (VAS2), vital signs will be recorded (VS2), and a blood sample collected (B2). Clinical improvement in this study will be defined as a VAS score that is at least 13mm less than the baseline VAS score (VAS1). Patients that fail to show clinical improvement at 30 minutes will receive Dose 2 of study medication (Dose 2 will be identical to Dose 1). Patients showing clinical improvement will not receive Dose 2.

Thirty minutes after VAS2 (or after the start of Dose 2, if applicable), VAS3 will be administered, vital signs (VS3) will be recorded, and a blood sample (B3) will be collected. If the patient has not clinically improved relative to baseline, the patient will be deemed a treatment failure; the treatment phase will be discontinued, and the patient will be treated in accordance with standard of care by the investigator and/or treating physician. Patients that have clinically improved will remain in the treatment arm.

The remaining 1.5 hours of the treatment arm will consist of serial assessments of pain intensity (VAS4, 5 and 6), vital signs (VS4, 5 and 6), and collection of one blood sample (B4, 5 and 6) every 30 minutes. After each VAS, the patient must continue to show clinical improvement relative to baseline to remain in the treatment arm. Otherwise, the patient will exit the treatment phase and be treated in accordance with standard of care. No analgesics will be allowed during the treatment phase to eliminate the potential confounding effect of pain medication on assessing the effectiveness of the study medication on clinical improvement. Routine decision points for treatment failure (every thirty minutes) will promote accurate identification of treatment failures without compromising timely provision of pain medication in absence of clinical improvement.

All patients will be closely monitored for adverse events during Dose 1 of treatment until the time of discharge from the emergency department. Follow-up for possible adverse events and recurring/residual symptoms will be conducted by telephone on Days 2, 10, and 17 after discharge from the emergency department.

Treatment failure will be defined as (1) early exit from the treatment phase due to absence of clinical improvement relative to baseline and/or (2) patient requires prescription pain medication or Antivenin Latrodectus Mactans (Merck) for pain associated with the study condition being treated at any time after the treatment phase up to 48 hours after the time of discharge from the emergency department. To improve accurate identification of treatment failure after discharge, no preventative pain medication will be administered or prescribed to patients that successfully complete the treatment phase. Patients will be encouraged to call the investigator or return to the emergency department, if necessary, for proper evaluation and treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
        • Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85008
        • Maricopa Medical Center
    • California
      • Davis, California, United States, 95616
        • University of California Davis
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93701
        • University California San Francisco - Fresno
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92697
        • University of California Irvine
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
        • Loma Linda University
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • University of California San Diego
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • San Diego Children's Hospital
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80010
        • University of Colorado Hospital
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80204
        • Denver Health and Hospital Authority
    • Florida
      • Cape Coral, Florida, United States, 33990
        • Cape Coral Hospital
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida, Department of Emergency Medicine
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71106
        • LSU Health Sciences
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87131
        • University of New Mexico
    • Texas
      • El Paso, Texas, United States, 79905
        • Texas Tech - West Texas Regional Poison Center
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate to severe pain intensity measured using the visual analog scale (VAS score ≥ 40mm) at the start of screening phase (VAS 0)
  • Diagnosis of latrodectism by the Investigator, with concurrence of diagnosis by a physician not directly involved with the study
  • Moderate to severe pain intensity measured using the visual analog scale (VAS score ≥ 40mm) at Baseline (VAS 1)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 10 years of age
  • Presents to the emergency department of any healthcare facility greater than 24 hours after onset of symptoms
  • Has a known (self-reported) hypersensitivity to fentanyl, morphine, diazepam, or equine serum
  • History of significant cardiac, respiratory, hepatic or renal disease, psychiatric disorder or chronic pain syndrome that in the investigator's assessment would confound efficacy or safety endpoint assessment (e.g., a bite to the leg of a patient with reflex sympathetic dystrophy)
  • History or suspected history or substance abuse
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Has a distracting injury with acute pain, or is unable to make a reliable self-report of pain intensity to pain relief based solely on the condition of interest
  • Was already treated with Merck Antivenin Latrodectus Mactans for signs/symptoms related to the current widow spider bite
  • Unable to provide a telephone number to be contacted for follow-up interviews on Days 2, 10, and 17 after discharge from the emergency department

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Analatro
Antivenin Latrodectus (Black Widow) Equine Immune F(ab)2
30 mL of lyophilized antivenom, reconstituted in 50 mL saline infused over 10 minutes, up to 2 doses
Placebo Comparator: Normal Saline Placebo
Normal Saline
50 mL of saline infused over 10 minutes
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment Failure
Time Frame: From start of Dose 1 infusion to 48 hours post treatment

The primary efficacy endpoint for this study was the number of subjects in which pain control was not achieved 48 hours post-study drug infusion as identified by treatment failure. A treatment failure was defined as a subject who did not achieve pain control during the treatment phase, up to 48 hours after Dose 1 infusion start time. Subjects were deemed treatment failures if they met one or more of the following criteria:

  • Subject did not complete the treatment phase due to absence of clinically significant improvement in pain intensity relative to baseline at 60, 90, 120, or 150 minutes post start of Dose 1.
  • Subject required treatment with commercially available antivenin or prescription pain medication for signs and symptoms associated with latrodectism at any time during the treatment phase up to 48 hours after Dose 1 infusion start time.
From start of Dose 1 infusion to 48 hours post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With at Least 13 mm Reduction in Pain Score at 30 Minutes Post-Treatment
Time Frame: 30 minutes post treatment
The number of patients with a clinically significant decrease in pain intensity at 30 minutes post-treatment (after Dose 1 and Dose 2, as applicable) will be measured by the patient's self-assessment of pain intensity using the visual analog scale (VAS). A clinically significant reduction in pain is defined as a decrease in VAS scores of greater than or equal to 13 mm. The VAS ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).
30 minutes post treatment
Drug-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: Start of Dose 1 through 17 days post treatment
To evaluate safety of Analatro, the number of subjects experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) that was determined to be related to study drug was computed for each treatment group. All AEs classified as definitely or possibly related to study drug were considered drug-related.
Start of Dose 1 through 17 days post treatment
Number of Participants With at Least 13 mm Reduction in Pain Score at Any Time Point
Time Frame: Start of Dose 1 to any post-infusion time point
The number of patients with a clinically significant decrease in pain intensity relative to baseline at any time point during the treatment phase was measured by the patient's self-assessment of pain intensity using the visual analog scale (VAS). A clinically significant reduction in pain was defined as a decrease in VAS scores of greater than or equal to 13 mm. The VAS ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).
Start of Dose 1 to any post-infusion time point
Drug-related Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Start of Dose 1 through 17 days post treatment
The number of subjects with drug-related serious adverse events.
Start of Dose 1 through 17 days post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard C Dart, MD, PhD, Rocky Mountain Poison & Drug Center - Denver Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 14, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • XF-07/03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Latrodectism

Clinical Trials on Analatro

3
Subscribe