Clinical Performance of a New Daily Disposable Contact Lens Worn in a Neophyte Population.

December 3, 2019 updated by: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
This study seeks to evaluate the impact of wearing a new daily disposable soft contact lens on the neophyte population.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Greater Manchester
      • Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom, M60 1QD
        • Eurolens Research, The University of Manchester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 39 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. They are of legal age (18 years) and capacity to volunteer.
  2. They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
  3. They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
  4. They would be expected to attain at least 6/9 (20/30) in each eye with the study lenses.
  5. They are able to wear contact lenses with a back vertex power of -1.00 to -6.00DS.
  6. They have a maximum of 1.00D of refractive astigmatism (i.e. ≤ 1.00 DC).
  7. They have successfully worn contact lenses within six months of starting the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  2. They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  3. They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
  4. They are aphakic.
  5. They have had corneal refractive surgery.
  6. They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or has keratoconus.
  7. They are pregnant or lactating.
  8. They have grade 2 or greater of any of the following ocular surface signs: corneal oedema, corneal vascularisation, corneal staining, tarsal conjunctival changes or any other abnormality which would normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  9. They have any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis) or any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
  10. They have diabetes.
  11. They have taken part in any other clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: spectacles
habitual spectacles worn daily for 12 months
habitual spectacles
Experimental: narafilcon A soft contact lenses
narafilcon A soft contact lenses worn as daily disposable for 12 months
narafilcon A daily disposable contact lenses

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Papillary Conjunctivitis
Time Frame: 12 months
Papillary conjunctivitis which is collected as part of the biomicroscopy data and is identified from a slit lamp examination. Grade 0 to Grade 4 with grade 0 implying no health concerns.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomicroscopy Findings After 12 Months of Daily Wear From Slit Lamp Analysis.
Time Frame: at 12 months
Comprised of 8 categories (conjunctival hyperemia, limbal hyperemia, corneal vascularization, microcysts, Oedema, corneal staining, conjunctival staining and papillary conjunctivitis) each scored on a scale of 0 to 4 where 0=none, and 4=maximum score for each category.
at 12 months
Visual Acuity After 12 Months of Wear
Time Frame: at 12 months
Visual acuity is measured at high and low contrasts, via the Snellen scale which is then mathematically converted to logMar units. High contrast refers to a darker print on the Snellen chart and is an easier testing environment compared to the low contrast which has a grayer print.
at 12 months
Subjective Overall Comfort After 12 Months of Daily Wear
Time Frame: at 12 months
subject response using a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 = poor comfort, 100 = excellent comfort
at 12 months
Subjective Overall Vision After 12 Months of Daily Wear
Time Frame: at 12 months
subject response using a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 = poor vision, 100 = excellent vision
at 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

July 2, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CR-0806

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractive Error

Clinical Trials on spectacles

3
Subscribe