Comparison of Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) Versus Bolus Narcotic Therapy for the Treatment of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC)

March 22, 2017 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

PCA for Pain Control in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease in the Emergency Department (ED) Decreases Admission Rates Over Standard Bolus Therapy

This research is being done to find out the best way to give narcotics for pain relief in adults with sickle cell disease and painful crisis. This study is a comparison of two ways of giving narcotics. The first way is what occurs now in the Emergency Acute Care Unit (EACU) where patients are given a single intravenous (iv) dose of a narcotic which is repeated by the nurse as needed to control the pain. The second way is to provide a single iv dose of narcotic and then allow the patient to push a button and receive one or more additional doses of narcotic when he/she thinks it is needed. Our hypothesis is that PCA will be a more effective way of controlling pain.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented sickle cell disease
  • Signed consent in outpatient clinic or during a prior hospitalization
  • 18+ years of age
  • Seen in the ED with sickle cell pain crisis - this will be based on patients chief complaint that they are in a VOC.
  • Requires IV administration of narcotics (has failed oral narcotic therapy at home)
  • Must be 2 weeks since their last randomization on this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to the use of IV narcotics
  • Hypotension with systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤ 90
  • Respiratory rate ≤9
  • Altered mental status
  • Patient unable to understand how to use the PCA device
  • Patient unwilling to use PCA device
  • Pulse oximeter reading of ≤ 94% on room air
  • Patient is allergic to IV morphine & hydromorphone & fentanyl.
  • Patient is allergic to oral hydromorphone & morphine & oxycodone
  • Patient has been randomized on this study 3 times before

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1
In this arm patients will be randomized to receive a bolus of narcotic followed by PCA.
Patients in this arm will be treated with a bolus of narcotic followed by PCA
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 2
In this arm patients will be randomized to the current standard of care of bolus narcotic treatment.
In this arm patients will receive the current standard of care of IV bolus narcotic therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Decrease in admissions for those treated with a PCA in the ED v those that are given bolus narcotic dosing
Time Frame: Measured at time of discharge from ED
Measured at time of discharge from ED

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Length of stay
Time Frame: Endpoints will be the time at which the decision for discharge from the EACU or transfer from the EACU to inpatient admission to the hospital is made
Endpoints will be the time at which the decision for discharge from the EACU or transfer from the EACU to inpatient admission to the hospital is made
Total narcotic used
Time Frame: Endpoints will be the time at which the decision for discharge from the EACU or transfer from the EACU to inpatient admission to the hospital is made
Endpoints will be the time at which the decision for discharge from the EACU or transfer from the EACU to inpatient admission to the hospital is made

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2009

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 9, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sickle Cell Disease

Clinical Trials on Patient controlled analgesia

3
Subscribe