Efficacy and Mechanisms of Pharmacologic Treatment of Fecal Incontinence (FIRM)

March 18, 2015 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare treatment with fiber and loperamide for fecal incontinence.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Fecal incontinence (FI) affects 4-24% adults in the community and greatly impacts quality of life. Both fiber and loperamide are common, first-line treatments for diarrhea-associated FI in primary care. No known studies exist that compare fiber and loperamide for diarrhea-predominant FI. Further knowledge is needed to define which treatment is more effective and to compare drug tolerability (side effects) for FI. This study will also look at changes in quality of life with treatment and potential mechanisms of drug treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • VA Medical Center, Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • weekly fecal incontinence

Exclusion Criteria:

  • fecal impaction
  • inability to complete a baseline 1-week bowel diary
  • rectal prolapse
  • any prior radiation to the pelvis
  • colo-rectal cancer
  • rectal fistula
  • inflammatory bowel disease
  • neurological diseases (spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease)
  • constipation (<2 bowel movements/week) or total colectomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 1
Fiber (psyllium) powder
2 teaspoons with 8 ounces of liquid daily for 28 days (weekly adjusted dose)
Other Names:
  • Metamucil
Active Comparator: Arm 2
Loperamide
1 capsule daily for 28 days (weekly adjusted dose)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
7-day Bowel Diary, Number of Fecal Incontinence Episodes
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks
After consent, 7-day bowel diary was assessed at baseline (2-week visit), during the last week of the 4-week intervention (6-week visit), during the second week of the 2-week wash-out period at 8-weeks, and during the last week of the second 4-week intervention (12 weeks). The mean number of total fecal incontinence episodes from a 7-day bowel diary from each time point was compared between the groups.
6 weeks and 12 weeks
Percentage of Bowel Movements With Incontinence
Time Frame: 4 weeks
After consent, 7-day bowel diary was assessed at baseline (2-week visit), during the last week of the 4-week intervention (6-week visit), during the second week of the 2-week wash-out period at 8-weeks, and during the last week of the second 4-week intervention (12 weeks). We compared the percentage of the total number of fecal incontinence episodes over the total number of bowel movements from a 7-day bowel diary from each time point between the groups.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fecal Incontinence Severity Index Score, FISI
Time Frame: baseline, 4 week and 12 weeks
The patient-reported symptoms severity score, the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), has 4 questions about the frequency of gas, mucus, liquid stool, and solid stool incontinence. Responses are weighted based on the patient rating of severity and a total score is calculated (range 0-61) with higher scores indicating a greater severity of symptoms.
baseline, 4 week and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alayne D Markland, DO MSc, VA Medical Center, Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

August 4, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 1, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fecal Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Psyllium powder

3
Subscribe