Psyllium Fiber Versus Placebo in Early Treatment After STARR for Obstructed Defecation: a Double-blind RCT

May 10, 2014 updated by: Francesco Gabrielli

Efficacia Della Fibra di Psyllium Versus Placebo Nella Gestione Dell'Alvo in Pazienti Sottoposti ad Intervento Chirurgico Per Ostruita Defecazione

This study aims to assess whether fiber intake, formerly recommended only before or instead of surgery, may play a role in improving postoperative progress and functional outcome after STARR for obstructed defecation, in terms of residual constipation, incontinence and defecation urgency.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

After obtaining written informed consent and collecting baseline scores (T0), each patient was randomly assigned to one of the two groups and began taking sachets containing Psyllium fiber 3.5 g / day for Active group (A) and inert compound for Placebo group (P).

Sachet content was assigned by software randomization, written on a list and sealed in an envelope, which was opened only after the study was completed.

Post-operative instructions for both groups included only analgesic therapy (Ketorolac 10 to 30 mg b.m. if needed). Patients were also asked to stop any former laxative and to continue on a normal diet.

Each patient was re-evaluated at 7 ± 3 (T1), 60 ± 5 (T2) and 180 ± 15 (T3) days after surgery (Table 2).

A fluoroscopic colpocystodefecography (with patient sitting upright) was obtained before surgery and between 60-180 days postoperatively in order to assess comparability of the two groups and exclude negative organic outcomes that could affect functional results.

Medical events were investigated while checking each patient, with special regard to defecation urgency. From the data collected on concomitant medications, we extrapolated those related to laxative intake.

The treatment was considered accomplished in patients who had taken at least 70% of the product during each interval of follow-up.

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS - PASW Statistics 18.0.0 (IBM ©, 2009).

For the general and defecographic characteristics, the data are expressed in the form of mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and absolute frequency (frequency percentages) for categorical variables. The differences between the two groups were calculated by two-tailed t-test or chi-square when appropriate.

Scores for the assessment of clinical data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and analysis of the differences in the two groups was performed using the two-tailed t-test. The analysis of not normally distributed variables was conducted using a non-parametric test (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney).

Analyses related to defecation urgency and use of laxatives were carried out using chi-square test and the data are expressed as absolute frequency (frequency percentage).

For all tests, a value of p <0.05 was considered significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • MB
      • Monza, MB, Italy, 20052
        • Istituti Clinici Zucchi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent
  • Age over 18
  • Diagnosis of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome according to ODS and CCS Score
  • STARR performed when ODS score >10
  • STARR performed 48-72 hours before

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Puborectalis or sphincter dyssynergia, evaluated by defecography and / or anorectal manometry
  • Concomitant diseases (fissure, abscess, fistula, IBD, diverticular disease)
  • Prolapse of other pelvic floor organs
  • Proctological surgery before STARR
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Ongoing treatment with oral anticoagulants or steroid therapy
  • Conditions that do not allow patients to understand the nature and the purpose of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
3.5 g /day of inert compound for 180 days after STARR
3.5 g /day of inert compound for 180 days after STARR
Other Names:
  • inert compound
Experimental: Psyllium fiber
3.5 g /day of pure Psyllium fiber for 180 days after STARR
3.5 g /day of pure Psyllium fiber for 180 days after STARR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
residual constipation
Time Frame: 180 days after STARR
ODS score and CCS score
180 days after STARR

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative pain
Time Frame: 180 days after STARR
VAS
180 days after STARR
revertence to laxative use
Time Frame: 180 days after STARR
frequency percentage of patients that reverted to laxative use after surgery
180 days after STARR
change in fecal incontinence from baseline
Time Frame: 180 days after STARR
Wexner Incontinence score
180 days after STARR
post-operative defecation urgency
Time Frame: 180 days after STARR
defecation urgency incidence
180 days after STARR

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Francesco Gabrielli, Prof., Università degli studi Milano Bicocca

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Constipation

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe