Women With Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Arteries Study

November 20, 2023 updated by: Northwestern University

Women With Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Arteries Study: A Randomized Study of Medical Treatment and Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of standard medical therapy versus usual care in women with chest pain, coronary endothelial dysfunction and unblocked coronary arteries.

Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) is a condition in which the layers of cells around the heart do not function properly and is believed to be key factor in the development of atherosclerosis (fat deposits in arteries). In addition, CED is associated with an increased risk for future cardiovascular events, such as heart attack and stroke.

A coronary angiogram allows physicians to see if any of the arteries in the heart are blocked, usually by fatty plaque. In many instances, angiograms in women experiencing chest pain do not show evidence of coronary disease (free of significant plaque build-up). Currently, there is no standard of care treatment plan for patients with normal coronary arteries, despite symptoms of chest pain, and as a result these patients may not receive medical treatment. However, these women often return to their physicians more than once with chest pain and go through a similar battery of tests.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Endothelial function testing will be performed on women without significant coronary disease in order to help identify women who may be likely to develop coronary artery disease (CAD) and who would benefit from aggressive lifestyle (dietary counseling, exercise) or medical (treatment with aspirin and cholesterol and blood pressure lowering medications) interventions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female gender
  2. Age 30 or greater
  3. Present with symptoms suggestive of Angina (Typical or "Atypical")
  4. Abnormal myocardial perfusion scan
  5. Referred for angiography
  6. Normal (0% stenosis) versus Nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (<50% stenosis)
  7. Evidence of endothelial dysfunction.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Coronary vasospasm known or documented in cardiac catheterization
  2. Obstructive CAD (greater than 50% stenosis) known or documented in cardiac catheterization
  3. Pregnancy
  4. Established CAD, history of revascularization with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)/stent or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
  5. Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  6. Cardiac catheterization for valvular disease
  7. Cardiac catheterization for heart failure assessment/biopsy
  8. Known congestive heart failure (CHF)/hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM)/dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM)
  9. Acute Renal Failure
  10. Chronic renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rare (eGFR) <30 ml/min/1.73m^2) or on hemodialysis
  11. Known single kidney
  12. History of peptic ulcer disease, known gastrointestinal bleed, known contraindication to aspirin
  13. Known contraindication to statin
  14. Known contraindication to adenosine (asthma, high degree atrial ventricular (AV) block)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care Group
USUAL CARE GROUP-therapy in this group will be no dictated medical therapy, but usual care, as dictated by their referring physician.
Active Comparator: Medical Treatment Group
TREATMENT GROUP-therapy in this group will be conventional treatment for CAD but targeting endothelial function, which will include aspirin, ACE-inhibitor and statin therapy, and therapeutic lifestyle changes.
Aspirin 81 mg daily
Lisinopril 10 mg every night
Simvastatin 20 mg every night
Other Names:
  • Zocor
Lovaza 1 gram daily
Other Names:
  • Fish Oil, Omega-3
Therapeutic lifestyle changes will be initiated with the assistance of a dietician, including diet counseling, exercise recommendation, and weight maintenance/weight loss.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of Therapy Compared to Usual Care, in Those Women With Chest Pain (CP), Reversible Ischemia by Stress Testing and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) by Angiography Who Are Found to Have Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction (CED).
Time Frame: 1 year
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of standard medical therapy versus usual care in women with chest pain (CP), coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) and unblocked coronary arteries. CED is a condition in which the layers of cells around the heart do not function properly and is believed to be a key factor in the development of atherosclerosis (fat deposits in arteries). In addition, CED is associated with an increased risk for suture cardiovascular events, such as heart attack and stroke.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Role and Function of Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) in the Presence of Proven Endothelial Dysfunction and the Response of EPCs to Medical Therapy for Endothelial Dysfunction.
Time Frame: 1 year
no analyses were conducted due to the PI's departure from the institution; all work including analyses ceased upon departure- the study was not transferred with the PI. In addition, the study end points were based on changes between groups (treatment vs. usual care group) at 12 month follow up for both groups - none of the enrolled subjects made it to the final (month 12) visit.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martha Gulati, MD, Northwestern University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2008

First Posted (Estimated)

August 28, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chest Pain

Clinical Trials on Aspirin

3
Subscribe