Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate for Chronic Hand Dermatitis

September 21, 2012 updated by: Stiefel, a GSK Company

An Open Label Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate for the Condition of Chronic Hand Dermatitis

The purpose of the study is to assess the safety, efficacy and tolerability of Clobetasol propionate foam in subjects with chronic dermatitis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study is being conducted in order to obtain safety, efficacy and tolerability data for Clobetasol propionate foam in the treatment of chronic dermatitis. The subjects must have mild to moderate disease based on the Investigator's assessment at baseline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40217
        • Physicians Skin Care

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects 18 years of age or older, with diagnosis of chronic dermatitis, able to complete the study and comply with study instructions.
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test. Sexually active women of childbearing potential participating in the study must have been using a medically acceptable form of contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of systemic corticosteroid and/or other prohibited medications within 4 weeks of the baseline visit.
  • Use of topical corticosteroid therapy and/or other prohibited topical medications within 2 weeks prior to the baseline visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: clobetasol propionate foam
All subjects receive clobetasol propionate
Clobetasol propionate. The study product will be applied topically twice a day (morning and evening) for 14 days of treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects With at Least 1-grade Improvement From Baseline to Day 15 in Investigator's Static Global Assessment Score (ISGA) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15

Proportion of Subjects with at least a 1-Grade Improvement from Baseline to Day 15 In Investigator's Static Global Assessment Score (ISGA) - Chronic Hand Dermatitis Please note that the proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

ISGA grades:

Score = 0 (Clear) Score = 1 (Almost Clear) Score = 2 (Mild) Score = 3 (Moderate) Score = 4 (Severe)

Baseline, Day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve at Least a 1-grade Improvement Based on the ISGA at Day 8.
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8

Please note that the proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

Investigator's Static Global Assessment Score (ISGA) At least 1-grade improvement (%) at Day 8

ISGA grades:

Score = 0 (Clear) Score = 1 (Almost Clear) Score = 2 (Mild) Score = 3 (Moderate) Score = 4 (Severe)

Baseline, Day 8
Change in Subject's Visual Analogue Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8
Mean change in subject's visual analogue assessment scale from baseline to day 8. At each visit, the subject is requested to rate the changes in their skin on the hands on a 1 to 10 scale with 0 being poor and 10 being excellent.
Baseline, Day 8
Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Finger Tips
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15

Proportion of subjects at day 15 with at least 1-Grade improvement in the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for all symptoms present at baseline - Finger Tips. The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

Baseline, Day 15
Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Finger Tips
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8

Proportion of Subjects at day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Finger Tips

The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

Baseline, Day 8
Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline - Fingers
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15

Proportion of Subjects at day 15 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Fingers.

The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

Baseline, Day 15
Proportion of Subjects With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Fingers
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8

Proportion of Subjects at day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline - Fingers

The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

Baseline, Day 8
Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Palm of Hands
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8

Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline - Palm of Hands.

The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

Baseline, Day 8
Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Palm of Hands
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15

Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 with at least a 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Palm of Hands The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

Baseline, Day 15
Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Back of Hands
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8

Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Back of Hands.

The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

Baseline, Day 8
Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Back of Hands
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15

Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Back of Hands.

The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

Baseline, Day 15
Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Wrists
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8

Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Wrists.

The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

Baseline, Day 8
Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Wrists
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15

Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI)for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Wrists.

The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

Baseline, Day 15
Change in Subject's Visual Analogue Assessment Scale From Baseline to Day 15
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15
Mean change in subject's visual analogue assessment scale from baseline to day 15. At each visit, the subject is requested to rate the changes in their skin on the hands on a 1 to 10 scale with 0 being poor and 10 being excellent.
Baseline, Day 15

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 26, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 3, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hand Dermatosis

Clinical Trials on clobetasol propionate

3
Subscribe