Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy for Primary Lung Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer, or Gastrointestinal Cancer

May 23, 2017 updated by: Mayo Clinic

Assessing the Clinical Significance of Real-time Quality of Life Data in Cancer Patients Treated With Radiation Therapy

RATIONALE: Gathering information about patients' quality of life during radiation therapy for cancer may help doctors plan the best treatment.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying quality of life in patients undergoing radiation therapy for primary lung cancer, head and neck cancer, or gastrointestinal cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

  • To determine if patient-reported quality of life (QOL) can be improved by the real-time use of QOL data in patients with primary lung, head and neck, or gastrointestinal cancer undergoing radiotherapy.
  • To obtain preliminary estimates for effect sizes on differences in key QOL domains between patients receiving real time QOL data and those not receiving QOL data.
  • To obtain preliminary estimates of differences in patient satisfaction between patients receiving real time QOL data and those not receiving QOL data.
  • To determine whether the availability of real-time QOL assessments in a radiation oncology practice increases the acceptance and utilization of QOL data by a clinical oncology team.
  • To evaluate clinician attitudes towards the incorporation of real-time QOL data into oncology patient management.
  • To evaluate the use of a set of clinical pathways for the incorporation of real time QOL data into oncology patient management.
  • To evaluate the potential impact on the quality of the patient-physician relationship with real-time use of QOL data compared to interactions where quality of life data are not utilized.
  • To obtain preliminary estimates of whether the real-time use of QOL data in a radiation oncology practice significantly increases the duration of the weekly on treatment visit.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

  • Group 1 (control): Patients complete QOL assessments (e.g., the Linear Analog Self Assessment [LASA]) at weeks 1, 3, and 5 during treatment and the last week of treatment. They also complete the Interpersonal Patient-Provider Relationship Scale (IPPRS) and Was it Worth It (WIW) questionnaires on the final day of treatment. Data is not shared with the physician, the patient, or any other clinical assistant that may be supporting the physician (e.g. nurse, or nurse practitioner).
  • Group 2 (active): Patients complete QOL assessments (e.g., LASA) and the IPPRS and WIW questionnaires as in group 1. Information from the questionnaires is shared with the physician, nurse, and/or nurse practitioner and the patient immediately prior to the on-treatment visit.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259-5499
        • Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 120 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with head and neck tumors, lung tumors, and gastrointestinal tumors receiving radiation therapy at Mayo Clinic Arizona

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of 1 of the following:

    • Primary lung cancer
    • Head and neck cancer
    • Gastrointestinal cancer
  • No evidence of distant metastasis
  • Receiving ≥ 5 weeks of definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy at Mayo Clinic Arizona

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Able to complete computer based questionnaires
  • Able to complete quality of life questionnaires in English
  • Willing and able to comprehend and provide informed consent

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Control
Patient's QOL assessments data is not shared with the physician, nurse, and/or nurse practitioner and the patient
Active
Patient's QOL assessments data is shared with the physician, nurse, and/or nurse practitioner and the patient immediately prior to the on-treatment visit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall quality of life (QOL) scores at baseline, weeks 1, 3, 5, and end of treatment as assessed by LASA
Time Frame: 7 Weeks
7 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Component QOL domains reported on the five numerical analogue items (physical, intellectual, emotional, spiritual, and social QOL), average pain item and fatigue reported in the LASA
Time Frame: 7 Weeks
7 Weeks
Frequency and severity of toxicity as assessed by NCI CTCAE at baseline, weeks 1, 3, 5, and of treatment
Time Frame: 7 Weeks
7 Weeks
Scores from the IPPRS, satisfaction with the physician scale score, and global question assessment
Time Frame: 7 Weeks
7 Weeks
Quantitative assessments from the post-treatment questionnaires and the qualitative data gleaned from the post-treatment interviews
Time Frame: One month post study
One month post study
Proportion of cases for which the clinical team indicates that the clinical pathways contributed positively to patient management, the number of cases which the clinicians report referrals were generated, and the qualitative data derived from the pos ...
Time Frame: One month post study
One month post study
Average physician rating of the patient-physician relationships for the two treatment groups
Time Frame: 7 Weeks
7 Weeks
Average duration of the weekly on treatment visit for the two treatment groups
Time Frame: 7 Weeks
7 Weeks
Percentage of patients for which physician reports indicate that availability
Time Frame: 7 Weeks
7 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michele Yvette Halyard, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 27, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer

3
Subscribe