Comparison of Propofol to Precedex With Propofol for Emergence and Recovery in Patients Having Craniotomy Surgery

February 9, 2012 updated by: The Cooper Health System

Comparison of Propofol Standard Anesthetic to Precedex With Propofol for Emergence and Recovery in Patients Having Craniotomy Surgery

Primary Hypothesis: The use of a Precedex infusion, in addition to propofol during surgery, will improve patient management through the anesthesia postoperative recovery period determined by improvement in patients? tolerance of the endotracheal tube.

Secondary hypothesis: The use of a Precedex infusion, in addition to propofol during surgery will provide improved hemodynamic stability.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to compare the addition of Precedex to a propofol intravenous anesthetic for emergence from anesthesia in patients having craniotomy surgery for brain tumors.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
        • Cooper University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA status 1, 2, and 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA status 4 and 5 patients
  • Patients with positive pregnancy tests

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Precedex
In the operating room routine anesthesia monitors will be placed and vital signs will be recorded continuously using data collection software. A routine propofol anesthetic will be administered to subjects randomized to the control group or a Precedex infusion with propofol for subjects randomized to the treatment group. Precedex infusion will be started after induction of general anesthesia. Vital signs (SBP, DBP, MAP) will be recorded continuously throughout the surgery. At the end of the case subjects will be extubated and the blinded observer will assess emergence from anesthesia based on hemodynamic stability and tolerance of the endotracheal tube. Videotaping of emergence will be used to assist in the evaluation of emergence of anesthesia and extubation.
Subjects randomized to the comparison group will receive a standardized general anesthetic. Anesthesia will be induced with propofol 1.5 ? 2.5 mg/kg, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, and sufentanil 0.1 ? 1mcg/kg. Anesthesia will be maintained with an infusion with propofol 25 -200 mcg/kg/min, sufentanil 0.0025 - 0.03 mcg/kg/min, and zemuron as needed. For the Precedex group the drug will be infused at 0.3-0.7 mcg/kg/hr. Blood pressure will be maintained within 10% of baseline prior to opening of the dura, subsequently to be maintained between a systolic of 100 ? 130 mmHg. Hypertension will be managed with standardized amounts of labetalol and nicardipine. Morphine will be titrated as needed to a maximum of 0.05mcg/kg at the conclusion of case. Hemodynamic data and emergence evaluations will be collected in the operating room, pre-induction until the end of anesthesia and discharge from the operating room. There will be no further follow up.
Active Comparator: Propofol
Propofol for emergence from anesthesia
evaulation of propofol for emergence from anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The use of Precedex for craniotomy surgery offers the potential for improved hemodynamic control and improved tolerance of the endotracheal tube, therefore potentially benefiting these patients.
Time Frame: 4 hours after awaking from surgery
4 hours after awaking from surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Misbin, MD, The Cooper Health System

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cranitomy Surgery

Clinical Trials on Precedex

3
Subscribe