Efficacy and Toxicity of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride vs. Standard Care for Prostate Cytoreduction for Brachytherapy

May 31, 2023 updated by: André-Guy Martin, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

Phase II Study of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride for Prostate Cytoreduction Prior to Permanent Implant I-125 Prostate Brachytherapy

The purpose of this study is to determine if a combination of neoadjuvant dutasteride and bicalutamide has the same efficacy and less toxicity than standard treatment with an LHRH agonist and bicalutamide for prostate cytoreduction prior to permanent implant brachytherapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Permanent implant prostate brachytherapy is recognized as the treatment method for prostate cancer that results in the least amount of sexual side effects including erectile dysfunction (ED). However prostate brachytherapy is often limited to patients with a prostate volume less than 50cc because of dosimetric and technical considerations. To counter this fact patients with a prostate larger than 50cc are offered neoadjuvant hormonal therapy to reduce their prostate volume to a value less than 50cc. The pharmacological method most often employed involves treatment with an LHRH agonist, which also involves multiple adverse effects for patients including ED in the majority of patients.

This approach may also involve other disadvantages including a possibility of increased cardiovascular mortality a possible increase in urinary toxicity and a reduction in health-related quality of life in patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Despite theses facts, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy remains essentially the sole method used to reduce prostate volume prior to prostate brachytherapy. One study has evaluated the efficacy of a neoadjuvant regimen without an LHRH agonist, comprised of Dutasteride and Bicalutamide to reduce prostate volume. This treatment could theoretically have fewer effects on sexual function and quality of life and could also possibly reduce urinary toxicity of brachytherapy. Nonetheless, these factors have never been evaluated. The cytoreductive efficacy of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride have never been directly compared to standard treatments. The current study is necessary to determine the effects of a neoadjuvant regimen of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride on prostate volume, sexual function, urinary toxicity and quality of life as compared to standard treatment. If it can be determined that there is an advantage with Bicalutamide and Dutasteride this regimen could become a standard of care for prostate cytoreduction prior to brachytherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Quebec, Canada, G1R 2J6
        • CHUQ- Hotel-Dieu de Quebec

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male sex
  • Diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma as confirmed by prostate biopsy
  • Prostate cancer with stage T1a, T1b T2a or T2b Nx Mx as determined by clinical examination
  • Gleason score of 6 or less or 7 (3+4)*

    * If Gleason score is 7(3+4) patient must have less than 30% of biopsied tissue positive

  • Serum PSA of ≤ 15ng/ml during the month before study entry
  • Prostate volume ≥ 45cc
  • Normal serum testosterone during the month before study entry
  • Availability for treatment and follow-up visits
  • Having signed required consent form before study entry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abnormal Liver Function tests (>2x normal AST or ALT and/or >1.5x normal bilirubin)
  • Prostate volume less than 50 cc
  • History of hormonal treatment including any of the above: LHRH agonists, antiandrogens during the year before study entry
  • Use of a 5 alpha reductase inhibitor for more than one month during the year prior to study entry
  • History of pelvic irradiation
  • History of past chemotherapy
  • History of TURP
  • History of past treatment for prostate cancer
  • Known hypersensitivity to Dutasteride or Bicalutamide
  • Co-morbid disease possibly compromising treatment compliance
  • History of DVT or pulmonary embolism
  • Anticoagulation with coumarin
  • Inability to give consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: LHRH agonist
Administration of a 3-month treatment with an LHRH agonist (chosen by the treating radiation oncologist) and Bicalutamide 50 mg daily for the first month of treatment with the LHRH agonist.
3-month treatment with an LHRH agonist chosen by the treating radiation oncologist and Bicalutamide 50 mg daily for the first month of treatment with the LHRH agonist.
Other Names:
  • Bicalutamide(Casodex)
Experimental: Dutasteride, Bicalutamide, Tamoxifen

Administration of Dutasteride given at dose of 0.5 mg daily starting three months prior to day of implant procedure and continued for 3 months up until procedure.

Bicalutamide: given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 3 the same 3 month period as dutasteride

Tamoxifen: given at dose of 10 mg daily for 3 months that dutasteride and bicalutamide are administered.

Dutasteride given at dose of 0.5 mg daily starting three months prior to day of implant procedure and continued for 3 months up until procedure.

Bicalutamide: given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 3 the same 3 month period as dutasteride

Tamoxifen: given at dose of 10 mg daily for 3 months that dutasteride and bicalutamide are administered.

Other Names:
  • Bicalutamide (Casodex)
  • Dutasteride (Avodart)
  • Tamoxifen (Nolvadex)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total prostate volume
Time Frame: 3 months after start of therapy
Trans rectal ultra sound 3 dimensional volume evaluation
3 months after start of therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EPIC questionnaire urinary function and bother scores
Time Frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
EPIC questionnaire sexual function and bother scores
Time Frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
EPIC questionnaire bowel function and bother scores
Time Frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
EPIC questionnaire hormonal function and bother scores
Time Frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
IPSS scores
Time Frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS)
baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Acute urinary retention rates
Time Frame: 0 to 6 months post-implant
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
0 to 6 months post-implant
SF-12 Quality of life questionnaire results
Time Frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
International Quality of Life Assessment - Short Form
baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Rate of gynecomastia and breast tenderness
Time Frame: 6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Serum testosterone
Time Frame: 3 months pre-implant, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
testosterone blood level
3 months pre-implant, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Anemia
Time Frame: baseline, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
haemoglobin blood level
baseline, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Abnormal liver function tests
Time Frame: 6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 3 months post-implant
Blood level of Alanine transaminase (ALT), Aspartate transaminase (AST), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Bilirubin, Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), L-lactate dehydrogenase (LD).
6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 3 months post-implant
Serum PSA
Time Frame: baseline, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
serum testosterone blood level
baseline, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Adverse events recording
Time Frame: 6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andre-Guy Martin, MD, CHUQ-Hotel-Dieu de Québec

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2009

First Posted (Estimated)

March 20, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Clinical Trials on administration of a LHRH agonist and Bicalutamide

3
Subscribe