Pilot Study of Lidocaine 5% Patch Versus Placebo in Patients With Osteoarthritis Pain of the Knee

February 9, 2010 updated by: Endo Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine 5% Patch With Placebo in Patients With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Patients with unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee participated in a Phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy of lidocaine 5% patch compared with placebo in the treatment of pain from OA of the knee.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

224

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
      • Hueytown, Alabama, United States
      • Tallassee, Alabama, United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
    • Colorado
      • Boulder, Colorado, United States
    • Florida
      • Deland, Florida, United States
      • Largo, Florida, United States
      • Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
      • St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States
    • Maryland
      • Wheaton, Maryland, United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Peabody, Massachusetts, United States
    • Michigan
      • Bingham Farms, Michigan, United States
    • Nevada
      • Reno, Nevada, United States
    • New Jersey
      • Berlin, New Jersey, United States
    • Ohio
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Bartlett, Tennessee, United States
      • Cordova, Tennessee, United States
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Had unilateral or bilateral OA of the knee diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria based on clinical and radiographic evidence (presence of osteophytes on x-ray and written evaluation) of OA
  2. Had functional capacity class rating of I, II, or III according to ACR classification
  3. Had normal 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) without any clinically significant abnormalities in heart rate, rhythm, or conduction
  4. Had discontinued use of all analgesic medications (including over-the-counter [OTC] analgesics) prior to randomization (patients were allowed limited use of analgesic medications for non study pain
  5. At baseline visit, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment if they had an average pain intensity rating for the index joint of 6 or greater (on a 0 to 10 scale) for at least 3 days out of the 5 consecutive days immediately prior to the baseline visit; 0 is defined as "no pain" and 10 is defined as "pain as bad as ever imagined" as measured by Question 5 of the BPI and recorded in a diary
  6. At baseline visit, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment if they had, at the baseline visit, an OA severity score for the index joint of 7 or greater on a composite scale of 0 to 24 as measured by the Index of Severity for Osteoarthrosis of the Knee

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Had been diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis, gout, pseudo-gout or Paget's disease that in the investigator's opinion would have interfered with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of OA
  2. Had serious medical conditions requiring daily medications, such as anticonvulsants and tricyclic antidepressants, that could have confounded study results
  3. Had any other clinically significant joint disease or prior joint replacement surgery at the index joint
  4. Had severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance of <30 mL/min)
  5. Had moderate or greater hepatic impairment
  6. Were taking analgesic medications, glucosamine, or chondroitin that could not be discontinued during the study. Patients taking these medications prior to the study were required to discontinue use for the duration of the study. Patients using opioid analgesics at study entry were required to taper off these medications.
  7. Were taking long-acting opioids or opioids that could not be discontinued over the first 5 days of the placebo run-in period.
  8. Were using lidocaine-containing product that could not be discontinued during the study
  9. Had previously failed treatment with Lidoderm analgesic patch for OA
  10. Had recently received either a corticosteroid injection (within 8 weeks) or hyaluronic acid (within 6 months) of study entry
  11. Were unable to discontinue use of topical drugs applied to the knee
  12. Were taking class I anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g. mexiletine, tocainide)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lidocaine 5% patch
Lidocaine 5% patch (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 1⅓ patches applied on each affected knee once every 24 hours
Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch.
Other Names:
  • Lidocaine 5% patch
Placebo Comparator: Placebo patch
Matching placebo patch, 1⅓ patches applied on each affected knee once every 24 hours
Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA Index
Time Frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Pain intensity and pain relief (BPI Questions 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8)
Time Frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS)
Time Frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Patient-rated and Investigator-rated Global Impression of Change in OA pain (categorical scale)
Time Frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Patient-rated and Investigator-rated Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction (categorical scale)
Time Frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
QoL: Pain interference on activities of daily living using Question 9 of the BPI
Time Frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
QoL: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Quality of Sleep (QOS)
Time Frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Safety assessments included AEs, dermal assessments, clinical laboratory tests (including urinalysis), vital sign measurements, physical examination results, and plasma lidocaine concentrations
Time Frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

May 19, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2010

Last Verified

February 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on Lidoderm

3
Subscribe