- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06184685
Safety and Efficacy of Sahasthara ME vs Diclofenac ME for Treating Primary Knee Osteoarthritis
A Comparative Double-Blinded Randomized Study: Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Sahasthara Microemulsion Versus Diclofenac Microemulsion for Treating Primary Knee Osteoarthritis
Background: Sahasthara is a traditional Thai herbal remedy used for the anti-inflammatory treatment of the musculoskeletal system, while diclofenac sodium is one of the most topically administered anti-inflammatory drug. However, there has not been scientifically researched regarding the efficacy and safety of SHT formulated as ME.
Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of Sahasthara microemulsion (SHT-ME) in comparison to a diclofenac microemulsion (DF-ME) in treating primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.
Methods: A randomized, double blinded clinical trial phase II was conducted. One treatment group received 1% SHT-ME, while the other received 2% DF-ME (2 ml, 3 times per day for 28 days) on their affected knee area. All patients were followed up at 14 and 28 days. Changes in the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain as well as 100-meter walking times, the WOMAC index scores, and a global assessment were examined for efficacy. Clinical examinations, abnormalities in laboratory tests, and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) were assessed for safety.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Outpatient participants, aged between 40 - 70 years old, were recruited. They were screened for symptoms of primary knee OA at the Department of Orthopedics, Thammasat University Hospital, Pathum Thani, Thailand, between October - December 2021. A diagnosis of knee OA in this clinical trial were made with a combination of clinical and radiographic findings according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Inclusion criteria for participants were those who had a pain score higher than 30 mm out of 100 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS), experiencing moderate to severe pain intensity from OA in one or both knees (patients who affected by knee OA bilaterally were evaluated, which more severely affected knee was included in the study) and had OA grade 1 to 3 (moderate/medium degree of pain) according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification grading scale for OA severity. The subjects would be excluded if they: 1) had a history of hypersensitivity to ingredients in SHT ME or DF-ME, 2) were pregnant or breast feeding, 3) had previous surgery knee replacement or intra-articular steroid injections within 3 months of inclusion in the study, 4) were having any coexisting musculoskeletal diseases (including rheumatoid arthritis, septic arthritis, metabolic arthritis, gout, pseudogout, and traumatic arthritis ) or dermatologic disorder which affected the surrounding skin of the knees, or 5) was assessed by body mass index (BMI) more than 32 kg/m2. The participants who were accepted to enroll in the study signed an informed consent.
Following enrollment, eligible patients were given a washout period of one week with no administration of analgesics before being randomly assigned to receive one of the treatments daily for 4 weeks. A randomized code number from a non-stratified randomization list generated by computer was used. The physicians, researchers, and statisticians were blinded from the allocation of patients involved in the trial. During the study, they were instructed not to use other analgesics, including injection drugs or other medications. Following the baseline visit, patients returned to the study site after 2 and 4 weeks for follow-up assessments of safety, efficacy and study protocol compliance.
In the trial, demographic data, clinical signs and symptoms, physical examination, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, 100-meter walk times, the WOMAC index scores (pain, physical function, stiffness), and laboratory tests (fasting blood sugar, lipid profile, liver function tests (AST, ALT, ALP), and renal function tests (BUN, creatinine clearance)) were collected as baseline data and as study data on day 14 and on day 28
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pathum Thani
-
Klong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand, 12120
- Thammasat University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- who had a pain score higher than 30 mm out of 100 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS)
- experiencing moderate to severe pain intensity from OA in one or both knees (patients who affected by knee OA bilaterally were evaluated, which more severely affected knee was included in the study) and had OA grade 1 to 3 (moderate/medium degree of pain) according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification grading scale for OA severity
Exclusion Criteria:
- had a history of hypersensitivity to ingredients in SHT ME or DF-ME
- were pregnant or breast feeding
- had previous surgery knee replacement or intra-articular steroid injections within 3 months of inclusion in the study
- were having any coexisting musculoskeletal diseases (including rheumatoid arthritis, septic arthritis, metabolic arthritis, gout, pseudogout, and traumatic arthritis ) or dermatologic disorder which affected the surrounding skin of the knees
- was assessed by body mass index (BMI) more than 32 kg/m2
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Sahasthara Microemulsion
The extract of Sahasthara remedy was obtained by maceration with 95% ethanol for 3 days.
The marc was re-extracted using the same process two more times.
After that, the extract was filtered, concentrated using a rotary evaporator at 40 degree C and vacuum (Rotavapor R-205, Buchi, Switzerland), to gave a yield of 10.3% w/w.
Finally, SHT ethanolic extract was formulated into a microemulsion with 1% (w/w) of extract and was stored in 50 ml bottles.
|
All patients were instructed to treat the knee with 2 ml, 3x/day, for 28 days.
Each of the patients received the same appearance of drug packaging, which was not revealed until data analysis was completed, or medical emergency conditions would require an unblinding.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Diclofenac Microemulsion
DF-ME, which consists of 2% diclofenac sodium, was compounded according to the published instructions by RS Therapeutics Inc. (Canada) and stored in the same containers as SHT-ME.
|
All patients were instructed to treat the knee with 2 ml, 3x/day, for 28 days.
Each of the patients received the same appearance of drug packaging, which was not revealed until data analysis was completed, or medical emergency conditions would require an unblinding.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The WOMAC index
Time Frame: 28 days (ฺDay0, Day14, Day28)
|
It is a self-administered questionnaire from the latest version of WOMAC 3.1 (the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) (Haq & Davatchi, 2011; Roos et al., 1999).
The patients were evaluated by the WOMAC index in terms of three domains: pain score ranged from 0 (no pain) to 4 (extreme pain); physical function score ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 4 (the most severe difficulty); stiffness score ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 4 (the worst stiffness).
|
28 days (ฺDay0, Day14, Day28)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 28 days (ฺDay0, Day14, Day28)
|
The pain intensity was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), a 100-mm line representing the continuum of pain degree, arranged into 3 levels of pain: mild = 0-30; moderate = 31-60; and maximum pain = 61-100 (Haefeli & Elfering, 2006).
|
28 days (ฺDay0, Day14, Day28)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
100-meter time walk
Time Frame: 28 days (ฺDay0, Day14, Day28)
|
Time to walk a straight horizontal indoor distance of 100 m (100-meter time walk) and the need of the participants for taking analgesics were evaluated.
|
28 days (ฺDay0, Day14, Day28)
|
The global assessment
Time Frame: 28 days (ฺDay0, Day14, Day28)
|
The global assessment on a 0-4 Likert scale (0: none, 4: excellent) was executed by the patients themselves at the last follow-up.
|
28 days (ฺDay0, Day14, Day28)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Joint Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Arthritis
- Osteoarthritis
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Antirheumatic Agents
- Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors
- Diclofenac
Other Study ID Numbers
- Ninnart Intharit 01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Primary Knee Osteoarthritis
-
CrystalGenomics, Inc.CompletedLocalized Primary Osteoarthritis of Hip | Localized Primary Osteoarthritis of KneeKorea, Republic of
-
Barbara A RakelCompletedUnilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of Knee | Primary Osteoarthritis of Knee NosUnited States
-
National Geriatric HospitalIchimaru Pharcos, Co., Ltd.CompletedPrimary Osteoarthritis of Knee NosVietnam
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Gonarthrosis; Primary | Gonarthrosis | Gonarthrosis; Primary, Bilateral | Knee ArthritisTurkey
-
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la RechercheRecruitingUnilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of KneeFrance
-
Virtua Health, Inc.RecruitingPrimary Osteoarthritis of Knee NosUnited States
-
Pharmanutra S.p.a.NEA Clinical S.r.l.CompletedPrimary Knee Osteoarthritis Grade 3 - 4Georgia
-
University of OxfordUniversity of Copenhagen; Zimmer BiometUnknownPrimary Osteoarthritis of Knee NosUnited Kingdom
-
Mahidol UniversityCompletedPrimary Osteoarthritis of Knee NosThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityCompletedPrimary Osteoarthritis of Knee NosThailand
Clinical Trials on Sahasthara Microemulsion
-
Reig Jofre GroupCompletedAllergic RhinitisSpain, Sweden
-
Pauls Stradins Clinical University HospitalCompletedCOVID-19 | Vitamin D DeficiencyLatvia
-
Asan Medical CenterCompletedPopulation Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of Microemulsion Propofol in Healthy VolunteersHealthyKorea, Republic of
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
NovartisCompleted
-
NovartisCompletedMaintenance Liver Transplant Patients With New Onset Diabetes
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompleted
-
NovartisCompleted
-
NovartisCompleted
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedChronic Plaque PsoriasisItaly